Defense Science Board

The Defense Science Board is "a Federal Advisory Committee established to provide independent advice to the Secretary of Defense."[1]

History

The Defense Science Board first met on September 20, 1956. The "initial assignment concerned the program and administration of basic research, component research, and the advancement of technology in areas of interest to the Department of Defense."

In December 1956, a charter specified the Board as an advisory body to the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Research and Development). Consolidation of offices in 1957 resulted in a revised board charter, the addition of ex officio members, and the addition of Applications Engineering. The charter was revised again with reorganization of the Department of Defense in 1958.

Assistant Directors were apointed for various types of warfare systems and, in late 1959, "the Board made a study of the structure of scientific and engineering advisory bodies." Revisions ensued in 1961 and 1971. In 1986, the title Director of Defense Research and Engineering was changed to Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (USDRE). In January 1990, the Defense Manufacturing Board, which had previously reported to the USD(A), was merged into the Defense Science Board, "adding manufacturing issues to the list of items of interest."

"The current Board is authorized to consist of thirty-two members plus seven ex officio members": the chairmen of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Policy, Ballistic Missile Defense Advisory Committee, and Defense Intelligence Agency Science and Technology Advisory Committee. "Members, whose appointed terms range from one to four years, "are selected on the basis of their preeminence in the fields of science, technology and its application to military operations, research, engineering, manufacturing and acquisition process."

"The Board operates by forming Task Forces consisting of Board members and other consultants/experts to address those tasks referred to it by formal direction. The products of each Task Force typically consist of a set of formal briefings to the Board and appropriate DoD officials, and a written report containing findings, recommendations and a suggested implementation plan."

Source: Defense Science Board History.

New Charter: 2002

A new charter was filed on February 28, 2002. The Defense Science Board (DSB) is to be composed of civilian members designated by the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics) to advise the Secretary of Defense, Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Under Secretary for AT&L, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff "on scientific, technical, manufacturing, acquisition process, and other matters of special interest to the Department of Defense." Board members now total 35, with five being Senior Fellow members. [2]

Members

A list of current members is not available on the DSB website.

Former Members

• Alvin L. Alm (deceased)
• Robert R. Everett, Member 1987 to 1993; Chairman 1988-89[3]
• Jacques S. Gansler, Ph.D., Member[4]
• David R. Heebner (deceased)

Possible Current Members, Consultants, and Experts

• Dr. William F. Ballhaus
• Dr. Michael J. Bayer
• Robert A. Beaudet
• Denis A. Bovin
• Dr. Joseph Braddock
• Dr. David L. Briggs
• General Michael P.C. Carns, USAF (Ret)
• Dr. Ashton B. Carter
• Dr. Ralph E. Chatham
• Dr. Robert S. Cooper
• Dr. Ruth A. David, Ph.D.
• William P. Delaney
• Dr. Regina Dugan
• John V. Ello
• Dr. Delores M. Etter
• Bran Ferren
• Craig I. Fields
• Dr. James S. Foster, Jr.
• Dr. Michael S. Frankel
• Richard L. Garwin
• Dr. Theodore S. Gold
• Dr. William R. Graham
• Dr. Roger Hagengruber
• General William W. Hartzog, USA (Ret)
• Dr. George H. Heilmeier
• Dr. Robert J. Hermann
• Dr. Donald A. Hicks
• William G. Howard, Jr.
• Admiral David E. Jeremiah
• Dr. Anita K. Jones
• Paul G. Kaminski
• Dr. Ronald L. Kerber
• Randy Larsen
• Dr. Don Latham (Donald C. Latham)
• Dr. Joshua Lederberg
• Patrick Lincoln
• Dr. Larry Lynn (V. Larry Lynn)
• Dr. Joseph Markowitz
• Peter Marino (Peter A. Marino)
• Gen. James P. McCarthy
• Col. Dave McIntyre, Ph.D. (USA, Ret)
• Ms. Judith A. Miller
• Dr. Gary J. Minden
• Walter E. Morrow, Jr.
• Robert F. Nesbit
• Daniel M. Nosenchuck
• Dr. Tara O'Toole
• Philip A. Odeen
• Thomas E. Peoples
• Admiral Don Pilling, (USN, Ret)
• Dr. George Poste
• Dr. C. Paul Robinson
• Dr. William Schneider, Jr., Chairman
• LtGen Brent Scowcroft, USAF (Ret), Ex Officio Member
• Dr. Anna Marie Skalka
• Albert E. Smith
• William O. Studeman
• Francis J. Sullivan
• Michael S. Swetnam
• Dr. Lydia W. Thomas
• VADM Richard H. Truly, USN (Ret)
• Vincent Vitto
• Dr. Richard L. Wagner, Jr.
• Gen Larry D. Welch, USAF (Ret)
• Dr. George M. Whitesides
• Larry T. Wright

Contact details

Defense Science Board
The Pentagon
OUSD(AT&L) Room 3D865
Washington, DC 20310
(703)695-4157
URL: http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/

Related SourceWatch Resources

• Army After Next (AAN)
• Defense Science Board Task Force Reports
• Joint Vision 2010
• Military-industrial complex
• nuclear weapons complex
• Pax Americana
• Proactive Preemptive Operations Group
• Revolution in military affairs (RMA)
• weapons of mass destruction
• Bill Browning - environmental advisor

External links

Articles & Commentary

• THE SECRET SHADOW GOVERNMENT: Defense Science Board, True Democracy, Summer 2001.
• DFI: Homeland Security: Update, June 24, 2003: "The Pentagon's Defense Science Board is scheduled to report is findings on an ongoing study aimed at assessing the National Guard's role in homeland security. The study, authorized by Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (AT&L) on January 6th, is also sponsored by the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for nuclear chemical and biological defense programs, the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, and U.S. Northern Command. Specifically, the study is examining the role of the National Guard and reserve in homeland security, as well as the implications for their war-fighting mission....According to the study's co-chair, Don Latham, there are no plans to publicly release the study." [Source: Inside the Pentagon, May 1, 2003].
• "The United States is losing the war of ideas in the Islamic world, failing to elucidate its policies to Muslims wary of American intentions" and "self-serving hypocrisy," Reuters, November 24, 2004, a Pentagon advisory panel has found. ... The toughly worded report said that while America's efforts to explain its policies have failed, improved public relations efforts cannot sell faulty policies. "Muslims do not hate our freedom, but rather they hate our policies," the panel stated.