Difference between revisions of "Sense about Science"

From SourceWatch
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (link typo)
m (remove namespace from link)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''[http://www.senseaboutscience.org.uk Sense about Science]''' describes it its role as being to "encourage a rational, evidence-based approach to scientific and technological developments".  According to the Daily Telegraph, it is "a group that studies public attitudes to risk" (see [[Risk management]]). [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/connected/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fconnected%2F2003%2F05%2F29%2Fecfluor28.xml]
 
'''[http://www.senseaboutscience.org.uk Sense about Science]''' describes it its role as being to "encourage a rational, evidence-based approach to scientific and technological developments".  According to the Daily Telegraph, it is "a group that studies public attitudes to risk" (see [[Risk management]]). [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/connected/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fconnected%2F2003%2F05%2F29%2Fecfluor28.xml]
  
It has a very close relationship with the [[Royal Society]].  For example, it has set up a [[Royal Society:Working party on peer review|Working party on peer review]] which meets at the RS, and is chaired by a member of the RS.  The working party also includes members of the [[Insitute of Ideas]]. [http://www.prwatch.org/prwissues/2003Q1/gm.html]
+
It has a very close relationship with the [[Royal Society]].  For example, it has set up a [[Working party on peer review]] which meets at the RS, and is chaired by a member of the RS.  The working party also includes members of the [[Insitute of Ideas]]. [http://www.prwatch.org/prwissues/2003Q1/gm.html]
  
 
It has helped publicised a variety of pro-GM stories in the media, including the [[Broom's Barn]] trials.  It co-ordinated an open letter from UK scientists to the Prime Minister, following a series of largely unfavorable GM articles in the media [http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=1689].
 
It has helped publicised a variety of pro-GM stories in the media, including the [[Broom's Barn]] trials.  It co-ordinated an open letter from UK scientists to the Prime Minister, following a series of largely unfavorable GM articles in the media [http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=1689].

Revision as of 08:43, 27 November 2003

Sense about Science describes it its role as being to "encourage a rational, evidence-based approach to scientific and technological developments". According to the Daily Telegraph, it is "a group that studies public attitudes to risk" (see Risk management). [1]

It has a very close relationship with the Royal Society. For example, it has set up a Working party on peer review which meets at the RS, and is chaired by a member of the RS. The working party also includes members of the Insitute of Ideas. [2]

It has helped publicised a variety of pro-GM stories in the media, including the Broom's Barn trials. It co-ordinated an open letter from UK scientists to the Prime Minister, following a series of largely unfavorable GM articles in the media [3].

Related, via Global Futures and common personnel, to the Institute of Ideas and the LM group. Additionally, the domain name senseaboutscience.org.uk was registered by Rob Lyons, who is also web master for Spiked online.

Staff

Both are former employees of Regester Larkin, a Risk management PR company.

Funding

Has funded lots of anti-GM research such as a survey on the cost of vandalism to sugar beet trials at Broom's Barn GM research centre.

Trustees

Advisory council

Funders

  • Association of the British Pharmaceutial Industry (ABPI)
  • Amersham plc
  • BBSRC
  • The Biochemical Society
  • BP plc
  • Mr D. Brydon
  • Prof A. Dixon
  • The Society for Endocrinology
  • The Society for General Microbiology
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Halifax Bank of Scotland
  • ISAAA
  • John Innes Centre
  • The John Innes Trust
  • Mr M. Livermore
  • Oxford GlycoSciences plc
  • Blackwells Publishing
  • Dr M. Ridley
  • Social Issues Research Centre
  • Unilever plc.


External links