Difference between revisions of "National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation"

From SourceWatch
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(cases)
(add Rogers article)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
According to its 2012 IRS Form 990, the NRTWLDF had $8.5 million in revenue, $6.1 million in expenses, and year end assets of $16.9 million.<ref>GuideStar, "[http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2012/591/588/2012-591588825-099557d4-9.pdf 2012 Form 990]," organization website, May 6, 2014.</ref> It reported spending $3.5 million on providing "legal assistance to workers suffering from abuses of compulsory unionism in hundreds of cases nationwide." Contributions are tax deductible but the organization does not disclose its donors.
 
According to its 2012 IRS Form 990, the NRTWLDF had $8.5 million in revenue, $6.1 million in expenses, and year end assets of $16.9 million.<ref>GuideStar, "[http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2012/591/588/2012-591588825-099557d4-9.pdf 2012 Form 990]," organization website, May 6, 2014.</ref> It reported spending $3.5 million on providing "legal assistance to workers suffering from abuses of compulsory unionism in hundreds of cases nationwide." Contributions are tax deductible but the organization does not disclose its donors.
  
The foundation received 85 grants totaling $4.54 million from conservative foundations between 1991 and 2005, including the [[Castle Rock Foundation]], [[John M. Olin Foundation, Inc.]], and the [[Walton Family Foundation]], according to Media Transparency.<ref>Gregory Heires, "[http://www.thenewcrossroads.com/2014/02/03/public-employee-unions-targeted-in-right-wing-case-before-the-supreme-court/ Public-Employee Unions Targeted in Right-wing Case before the Supreme Court]," The New Crossroads, February 3, 2014.</ref>
+
The Foundation received 85 grants totaling $4.54 million from conservative foundations between 1991 and 2005, including the [[Castle Rock Foundation]], [[John M. Olin Foundation, Inc.]], and the [[Walton Family Foundation]], according to Media Transparency.<ref>Gregory Heires, "[http://www.thenewcrossroads.com/2014/02/03/public-employee-unions-targeted-in-right-wing-case-before-the-supreme-court/ Public-Employee Unions Targeted in Right-wing Case before the Supreme Court]," The New Crossroads, February 3, 2014.</ref>
  
 
==Connection to the Koch Brothers==
 
==Connection to the Koch Brothers==
Line 26: Line 26:
 
*[[Davenport v. Washington Education Association]] (2007)
 
*[[Davenport v. Washington Education Association]] (2007)
 
*[[Knox v. Service Employees International Union]] (2012)
 
*[[Knox v. Service Employees International Union]] (2012)
*[[Harris v. Quinn]] (2014): the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in January 2014 and a decision is expected by June. Lawyers from the NRTWLDF argued that unionized home-care workers in Illinois, who are paid with state Medicaid money, should not be required to pay union dues.<ref>Amanda Becker, "[http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/21/usa-court-home-idUSL2N0KV1EN20140121 U.S. justices wary of free-speech argument in union dues challenge]," Reuters, January 21, 2014.</ref> They asked the Court to overturn its decision in Abood, which allowed unions to collect compulsory dues that support non-political activities.
+
*[[Harris v. Quinn]] (2014): the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in January 2014 and a decision is expected by June. Lawyers from the NRTWLDF argued that unionized home-care workers in Illinois, who are paid with state Medicaid money, should not be required to pay union dues.<ref>Amanda Becker, "[http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/21/usa-court-home-idUSL2N0KV1EN20140121 U.S. justices wary of free-speech argument in union dues challenge]," Reuters, January 21, 2014.</ref> They asked the Court to overturn its decision in Abood, which allowed unions to collect compulsory dues that support non-political activities. [[Joel Rogers]] writes in ''The Nation'' that ''Harris'' is "arguably the most important labor law case the Court has considered in decades...NRTWC success here would be a disaster for labor, particularly for the public sector unions that traditionally rely more heavily on agency shop agreements."<ref>Joel Rogers, "[http://www.thenation.com/article/179033/why-harris-v-quinn-has-labor-very-very-nervous# Why ‘Harris v. Quinn’ Has Labor Very, Very Nervous]," The Nation, March 27, 2014.</ref>
  
 
==Other Cases==
 
==Other Cases==
  
As of February 2014, the foundation's 11 staff attorneys and network of hundreds of local attorneys nationwide were involved in nearly 300 legal actions nationwide in courts and administrative agencies, including the [[National Labor Relations Board]].<ref>Gregory Heires, "[http://www.thenewcrossroads.com/2014/02/03/public-employee-unions-targeted-in-right-wing-case-before-the-supreme-court/ Public-Employee Unions Targeted in Right-wing Case before the Supreme Court]," The New Crossroads, February 3, 2014.</ref>
+
As of February 2014, the Foundation's 11 staff attorneys and network of hundreds of local attorneys nationwide were involved in nearly 300 legal actions nationwide in courts and administrative agencies, including the [[National Labor Relations Board]].<ref>Gregory Heires, "[http://www.thenewcrossroads.com/2014/02/03/public-employee-unions-targeted-in-right-wing-case-before-the-supreme-court/ Public-Employee Unions Targeted in Right-wing Case before the Supreme Court]," The New Crossroads, February 3, 2014.</ref>
  
 
In March 2014, Foundation attorneys sued [[Volkswagen]] and the [[United Auto Workers]] in federal court in Chattanooga, Tennessee, alleging that VW violated the Labor Management Relations Act by providing "things of value" to UAW before an unsuccessful unionization vote.<ref>Amanda Becker, "[http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/13/us-autos-vw-lawsuit-idUSBREA2C1VJ20140313 Anti-union workers sue Volkswagen, UAW over Tennessee plant]," Reuters, March 13, 2014.</ref> The UAW challenged the results of the election with the [[NLRB]], requesting a new election, and the Foundation is seeking an injunction to prevent VW from holding mandatory employee meetings about the election if there is another vote.<ref>Brent Snavely, "[http://www.freep.com/article/20140313/BUSINESS0104/303130144/UAW-Volkswagen-right-to-work-election-union-lawsuit Anti-union group files federal lawsuit against UAW and Volkswagen]," Detroit Free Press, March 13, 2014.</ref>
 
In March 2014, Foundation attorneys sued [[Volkswagen]] and the [[United Auto Workers]] in federal court in Chattanooga, Tennessee, alleging that VW violated the Labor Management Relations Act by providing "things of value" to UAW before an unsuccessful unionization vote.<ref>Amanda Becker, "[http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/13/us-autos-vw-lawsuit-idUSBREA2C1VJ20140313 Anti-union workers sue Volkswagen, UAW over Tennessee plant]," Reuters, March 13, 2014.</ref> The UAW challenged the results of the election with the [[NLRB]], requesting a new election, and the Foundation is seeking an injunction to prevent VW from holding mandatory employee meetings about the election if there is another vote.<ref>Brent Snavely, "[http://www.freep.com/article/20140313/BUSINESS0104/303130144/UAW-Volkswagen-right-to-work-election-union-lawsuit Anti-union group files federal lawsuit against UAW and Volkswagen]," Detroit Free Press, March 13, 2014.</ref>

Revision as of 18:43, 13 May 2014

The National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation or NRTWLDF (legally registered as the National Right to Work Legal Defense & Education Foundation Inc.) is an non-profit 501(c)3 organization that launches legal actions against labor organizations. Its mission is to "eliminate coercive union power and compulsory unionism abuses through strategic litigation, public information, and education programs."[1]

The Foundation works together with the National Right to Work Committee, which lobbies for anti-union legislation. The NRTWLDF was founded in 1968. They say: "The National Right to Work Committee was then active in Congress and state legislatures...but it was not structured to give legal aid. So by 1968, the time had come...rather than working in the legislative arena, such an organization could fight through the court system." [2]

Koch Wiki

Charles Koch is the right-wing billionaire owner of Koch Industries. As one of the richest people in the world, he is a key funder of the right-wing infrastructure, including the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and the State Policy Network (SPN). In SourceWatch, key articles on Charles Koch and his late brother David include: Koch Brothers, Americans for Prosperity, Stand Together Chamber of Commerce, Stand Together, Koch Family Foundations, Koch Universities, and I360.

Funding

According to its 2012 IRS Form 990, the NRTWLDF had $8.5 million in revenue, $6.1 million in expenses, and year end assets of $16.9 million.[3] It reported spending $3.5 million on providing "legal assistance to workers suffering from abuses of compulsory unionism in hundreds of cases nationwide." Contributions are tax deductible but the organization does not disclose its donors.

The Foundation received 85 grants totaling $4.54 million from conservative foundations between 1991 and 2005, including the Castle Rock Foundation, John M. Olin Foundation, Inc., and the Walton Family Foundation, according to Media Transparency.[4]

Connection to the Koch Brothers

Mark Mix, the Foundation's president, attended the June 2010 Koch Strategy Group Meeting. He spoke on a panel entitled "Mobilizing Citizens for November" along with Koch operative Sean Noble, Karl Crow of Themis, and Tim Phillips of Americans for Prosperity.[5]

Notable Supreme Court Cases

Other Cases

As of February 2014, the Foundation's 11 staff attorneys and network of hundreds of local attorneys nationwide were involved in nearly 300 legal actions nationwide in courts and administrative agencies, including the National Labor Relations Board.[8]

In March 2014, Foundation attorneys sued Volkswagen and the United Auto Workers in federal court in Chattanooga, Tennessee, alleging that VW violated the Labor Management Relations Act by providing "things of value" to UAW before an unsuccessful unionization vote.[9] The UAW challenged the results of the election with the NLRB, requesting a new election, and the Foundation is seeking an injunction to prevent VW from holding mandatory employee meetings about the election if there is another vote.[10]

Leadership

The organization is governed by a Board of Trustees. Current members as of its 2012 IRS 990 filing[11]:

Website

National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation
8001 Braddock Road
Springfield, Virginia 22160
Phone: (703) 321-8510 and (800) 336-3600
Fax: (703) 321-9613
Web: http://www.nrtw.org

Articles & Resources

References

  1. National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, "About," organization website, accessed May 6, 2014.
  2. "A Brief History of the Foundation", National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, accessed October 2007.
  3. GuideStar, "2012 Form 990," organization website, May 6, 2014.
  4. Gregory Heires, "Public-Employee Unions Targeted in Right-wing Case before the Supreme Court," The New Crossroads, February 3, 2014.
  5. Think Progress, "Secret Koch Meeting Documents," organization website, accessed May 8, 2014.
  6. Amanda Becker, "U.S. justices wary of free-speech argument in union dues challenge," Reuters, January 21, 2014.
  7. Joel Rogers, "Why ‘Harris v. Quinn’ Has Labor Very, Very Nervous," The Nation, March 27, 2014.
  8. Gregory Heires, "Public-Employee Unions Targeted in Right-wing Case before the Supreme Court," The New Crossroads, February 3, 2014.
  9. Amanda Becker, "Anti-union workers sue Volkswagen, UAW over Tennessee plant," Reuters, March 13, 2014.
  10. Brent Snavely, "Anti-union group files federal lawsuit against UAW and Volkswagen," Detroit Free Press, March 13, 2014.
  11. GuideStar, "2012 Form 990," organization website, May 6, 2014.

External links