The artificial sweetener aspartame (E951), marketed as NutraSweet, AminoSweet, Equal, Canderel, and now as a new modified, more concentrated and heat-resistant version called neotame (E961 — aspartame plus 3-di-methylbutyl, which can be found on the EPA’s list of most hazardous chemicals), has been the subject of constant controversy since its initial approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1974. Critics point to the conflicts of interest that marred the FDA's approval of aspartame, the shoddy industry-funded research supporting its safety, and point to independent research that shows numerous health risks associated with aspartame.
By 1998, aspartame products were the cause of 80% of complaints to the FDA about food additives. The complaints included headache, dizziness, change in mood, vomiting or nausea, abdominal pain and cramps, change in vision, diarrhea, seizures/convulsions, memory loss, and fatigue. Many studies have linked aspartame with a variety of conditions, including cancer. The cancer link was confirmed in 2011. A 2011 study showed that aspartame exposure increases blood glucose levels and therefore ups the risk of diabetes in humans.
Aspartame was found to be safe for human consumption by more than ninety countries, however the regulatory agencies have accepted the company-sponsored research without ever having done independent confirmatory studies.
In 2012, a human study showed that aspartame use is linked to increased risk of leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and multiple myeloma in men. The long term study spanned 22 years was led by Dr. Eva S. Schernhammer of the Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston.
In 2013, a study published in Folia Neuropathology found that aspartame is metabolized into three toxic molecules — phenylalanine, aspartic acid and methanol. The authors pointed out that methanol metabolites cause central nervous system depression, vision disorders and other disorders leading to metabolic acidosis and coma. Aspartic acid at high concentrations, according to the authors, is a toxin that causes hyperexcitability of neurons and is a precursor of another excitatory amino acid, glutamic acid. Phenylalanine at high levels can block the transport of important amino acids to the brain lowering the levels of dopamine and serotonin. Aspartame may also be carcinogenic because at least its metabolite diketopiperazine, can cause cancers in the central nervous system such as gliomas, medulloblastomas and meningiomas.
- 1 Genetic modification
- 2 Decomposition
- 3 History of approval and safety
- 4 Government action and voluntary withdrawals
- 5 Consumption
- 6 Safety and analysis
- 6.1 Introduction
- 6.2 Ramazzini Foundation studies
- 6.3 Industry-funded studies
- 6.4 Aspartame disease
- 6.5 Methanol and formaldehyde
- 6.6 Aspartylphenylalanine diketopiperazine
- 6.7 Premature birth
- 6.8 Fibromyalgia
- 6.9 Insulin resistance
- 6.10 Vestibular and cochlear toxicity
- 6.11 Brain functioning
- 7 Movie Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World
- 8 References
- 9 External links
Aspartame in bottled liquids breaks down after six to eight weeks of shelf life. Aspartame's major decomposition products are diketopiperazine, aspartyl-phenylalanine, and phenylalanine, as well as methanol. At 180ºC, aspartame undergoes decomposition to form a diketopiperazine derivative (DKP). Upon ingestion, aspartame breaks down into aspartic acid, phenylalanine, methanol (a nerve poison), and further breakdown products including formaldehyde, known to be a human carcinogen, formic acid (also a nerve poison), and DKP (diketopiperazine), named as a carcinogen in a 2008 study.
History of approval and safety
The controversy over aspartame safety originated in irregularities in the aspartame approval process during the 1970s and early 1980s, including allegations of conflicts of interest and claims that aspartame producer G.D. Searle, a Monsanto subsidiary, had withheld safety data. In 1996, the controversy reached a wider audience with a 60 Minutes report on concerns that aspartame could cause brain tumors in humans.
Approval in the United States
Aspartame was originally approved for use in dry foods in 1974 by then FDA Commissioner Alexander Schmidt after review by the FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. Searle had submitted 168 studies(p20) on aspartame, including seven animal studies that were considered crucial by the FDA.:21 Soon afterwards, John Olney, a professor of psychiatry and prominent critic of monosodium glutamate, along with James Turner, a public-interest lawyer and author of an anti-food-additive book, filed a petition for a public hearing, citing safety concerns.:38:63-4 Schmidt agreed, pending an investigation into alleged improprieties in safety studies for aspartame and several drugs. In December 1975, the FDA placed a stay on the aspartame approval, preventing Searle from marketing aspartame.:28
In 1976, the FDA notified then-U.S. attorney for Chicago, Sam Skinner, of the ongoing investigation of Searle, and in January 1977, formally requested that a grand jury be convened to investigate whether indictments should be filed against Searle for knowingly misrepresenting findings and "concealing material facts and making false statements" in aspartame safety tests (the first time in the FDA's history that they request a criminal investigation of a manufacturer). The U.S. Department of Justice instituted grand jury proceedings against Searle for fraud, but in February, 1977, Searle's law firm, Sidley & Austin, offered Skinner a job, which he accepted, recusing himself from the case. Despite complaints and urging from DOJ in Washington, neither the interim US attorney for Chicago, William Conlon, nor Skinner's successor, Thomas Sullivan, convened a grand jury, allowing the statute of limitations to expire. In December, 1977, Sullivan ordered the case dropped for lack of evidence, and Conlon was later also hired by Searle's law firm.
In 1986, a 110-page report by Senator Howard Metzenbaum alleged that the Chicago prosecutors "froze" the investigation so that the statute of limitations would run out.
In 1977 and 1978, an FDA task force and a panel of academic pathologists reviewed 15 aspartame studies by Searle, and concluded that, although minor inconsistencies were found, they would not have affected the studies' conclusions.:4 This conclusion was reached despite the testimony of Dr. M. Adrian Gross, a former senior FDA toxicologist, who stated that Searle's studies were largely unreliable and that least one of the studies has established beyond any reasonable doubt that aspartame is capable of inducing brain tumors in experimental animals, and that by allowing aspartame to be placed on the market, the FDA has violated the Delaney Amendment, which makes it illegal for any residues of cancer-causing chemicals to be permitted in foods. In 1980, a Public Board of Inquiry (PBOI) found Searle's test results "bizarre" and, deciding that further study was needed on a postulated connection between aspartame and brain tumours, revoked approval of aspartame.:47 Dr. Gross, the chief scientist on the FDA task force, told the CBS Nightly News staff in January, 1984, that Searle made "deliberate decisions" to cloak the toxic effects of aspartame. "They took great pains to camouflage these shortcomings of the study, filter and just present to the FDA what they wished the FDA to know. And they did other terrible things. For instance, animals would develop tumors while they were under study — well, G.D. Searle would remove these tumors from the animals," surgically masking the cancerous effects of aspartame.
|Adverse reactions reported to the FDA by Jan. 1987|
|No specified symptoms||96||2.2|
|Source: U. S. General Accounting Office Report, 1987:68|
Rumsfeld gets aspartame approved
Donald Rumsfeld, then president of G. D. Searle & Company (later sold to Monsanto), makers of NutraSweet, and simultaneously part of Ronald Reagan's transition team, vowed to "call in his markers" to get aspartame approved. Dr Arthur Hull Hayes was appointed as Commissioner of the FDA the day after Reagan's inauguration. In 1981, Hayes sought advice on aspartame's ban from a panel of FDA scientists and a lawyer. It soon became clear that the panel would uphold the ban by a 3-2 decision, but Hull then installed a sixth member on the commission, and the vote became deadlocked. He then personally broke the tie in aspartame's favor. Hayes justified his approval by citing an Ajinomoto-funded 1981 Japanese brain tumor study.
Several objections followed, but all were denied.:13 Following aspartame's approval, Searle, which had been floundering financially in the late 1970s and early 1980s, saw its profits soar. In November 1983, Hayes left the FDA under a cloud and joined Burson-Marsteller, chief public relations firm for both Monsanto and GD Searle, as a senior medical advisor. The appointment was widely seen as a reward for his approval of aspartame.
Because of the approval controversy, Senator Howard M. Metzenbaum requested an investigation by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) of aspartame's approval. In 1987, the GAO reported that protocol had been followed and provided a timeline of events in the approval process.:13 At that time, of 67 scientists who responded to a questionnaire, 12 had major concerns about Aspartame's safety, 26 were somewhat concerned but generally confident in Aspartame safety, and 29 were very confident in Aspartame safety.:16,76-81
In 1987, the U.S. Government Accountability Office concluded that the FDA had addressed the safety issues raised internally and by outside scientists and concerned citizens, but that it did not have the expertise to evaluate the adequacy of the FDA's resolution of issues.(p2) The GAO report stated that ongoing research into aspartame, and monitoring of adverse reactions, should provide the FDA with a basis for determining what future actions, if any, are needed on aspartame.(p2)
Approval outside the US
Following the FDA's lead, food additive safety evaluations by many countries have led to approval of aspartame, citing the general lack of adverse effects following consumption in reasonable quantities reported by industry-funded research. Food safety authorities worldwide have set acceptable daily intake (ADI) values for aspartame at 40 mg/kg of body weight. The FDA has set its ADI for aspartame at 50 mg/kg.
Government action and voluntary withdrawals
In New Zealand in 2007, a petition to New Zealand parliament's health select committee called for restrictions on aspartame, based on the case of Abby Cormack, who chewed four packets of sugar-free gum a day and drank large quantities of diet soft drink, reported dizziness, tingling, insomnia, paranoia and other problems which she said ended when she quit aspartame. The committee did not agree to the petitioners' request, but in a minority report, the Green Party called for warning labels to highlight aspartame's "potential adverse effects".
In 2007, the Indonesian government considered banning Aspartame. In the Philippines, the small political party Alliance for Rural Concerns introduced House Bill 4747 in 2008 with the aim of having aspartame banned from the food supply. The US state of New Mexico introduced a bill to ban aspartame in 2007, and Hawaiian legislators signed a 2009 resolution asking the FDA to rescind approval. In March 2009, the California OEHHA identified aspartame as a chemical for consultation by its Carcinogen Identification Committee, in accordance with California Proposition 65 (1986).
In April 2009, Ajinomoto Sweeteners Europe, the world's largest manufacturer of aspartame, responded to Asda's "No Nasties" campaign, which removed aspartame from the store's own-brand foods, by filing a complaint of malicious falsehood against Asda in the English courts. In July 2009, Asda won the legal case after the trial judge construed the 'no nasties' labelling to "not mean that aspartame was potentially harmful or unhealthy", though it might be appealed.
In 2009, the South African retailer Woolworths announced it was removing aspartame from its own-brand foods.
In 2009, the education authorities in the Canadian state of British Columbia banned all sweeteners, including aspartame, from schools. Associated press articles made particular mention of aspartame.
In 2010, the British Food Standards Agency launched an investigation into aspartame amid claims that some people experience side-effects after consuming the substance. Results of the study are due in early 2011.
In May 2011, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) accepted a request from the European Commission for the re-evaluation of the safety of aspartame in 2012. Before the study even began, it was revealed that EFSA had hired scientists linked to the food industry to perform the research. As expected, in 2013 EFSA cleared aspartame as safe at recommended consumption levels.
The nonprofit Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) sharply criticized EFSA's review, saying that the agency had disregarded important studies showing that aspartame causes cancer in animals. "Three large, independent studies that found a link between aspartame and cancer are far more reliable than inferior industry-funded studies that do not even meet current standards and did not find a link," said CSPI senior scientist Lisa Lefferts. "Yet the EFSA dismissed the independent studies, effectively whitewashing valid safety concerns. Aspartame just isn't worth the risk it poses to consumers."
A 12 ounce can of diet soda contains 180 mg of aspartame, and one liter of aspartame-sweetened soda contains 600 mg aspartame. U.S. diet beverage consumers average approximately 200 mg of daily aspartame consumption. For a 75 kg adult, it takes approximately 21 cans of diet soda to consume the 3,750 mg of aspartame that would surpass the FDA's 50 milligrams per kilogram of bodyweight ADI of aspartame.
Safety and analysis
While numerous scientific studies, most of which were funded by industry, found no adverse effects of aspartame ingestion, several scientists have recommended further research into postulated connections between aspartame and an increase in malignant brain tumors from 1982 to 1992 and in lymphoma.
In 2006, the US National Cancer Institute concluded in a study of over 470,000 men and women aged 50 to 69 that there was no statistically significant link between aspartame consumption and leukemias, lymphomas or brain tumors. The study compared how much of 4 types of aspartame-sweetened beverages the subjects said they had drunk in 1995 or 1996 to how likely they were to have developed these cancers during the following five years. This conclusion was questioned in letters to the journal's editors, which pointed out that the study did not consider non-beverage consumption of aspartame, did not estimate the subjects' long-term use of aspartame, and did not include any subjects who had consumed aspartame since childhood (as the subjects were all over 49 and aspartame beverages had only been on the market for 15 years). The letters concluded that the study design was inappropriate to test the stated hypothesis.
A 2007 study looked at aspartame and the genetics of cancer, and found that aspartame increased gene expressions in key oncogenes concerning all the investigated genes, especially in organs with a high proliferation rate (lymphoreticular organs, bone-marrow and kidney), and concluded that aspartame has a biological effect, even at the recommended daily maximum dose.
A 2010 study found that aspartame induced dose dependent chromosome aberrations "at all concentrations".
Ramazzini Foundation studies
In a series of studies, the respected European Ramazzini Foundation of Oncology and Environmental Sciences (ERF) reported a dose-independent, statistically significant increase in several malignancies of rats, concluding that aspartame is a potential carcinogen at normal dietary doses.
Exposures to aspartame continued until the animals' natural deaths, with the oldest rats living about 2.75–3.0 years. In the postnatal lifetime exposure study, aspartame caused mainly leukemias and lymphomas in males and females, peripheral nerve schwannomas in males, and possibly increases in total malignant tumors, kidney tumors, and brain tumors. The prenatal lifetime study showed increased incidences of lymphomas/leukemias in males and females, mammary gland cancers in females, and total tumor-bearing males.
The FDA requested study data from the Foundation, but in keeping with their policies, the data was not released. Therefore the FDA released a statement rejecting the findings, but stated that additional insight on the study findings could be provided by an internationally-sponsored pathology working group examination of appropriate tissue slides from the study.
Despite the rejection of the Ramazzini Foundation's findings, professor emeritus Samuel S. Epstein in 2009 called on the FDA to "promptly ban the continued use of aspartame" because of the Foundation's studies, inter alia. Several other scientists support the most recent ERF study. Two scientists referred to the newer study in their comments regarding the potential risks to workers who produce aspartame and are exposed to it under long-term conditions. They proposed that the FDA "should consider sponsoring a prospective epidemiologic study of aspartame workers."
In an open letter in June 2007 to the FDA, 11 doctors and PhDs argued that letting the animals live into old age —one of the most controversial aspects of the Italian studies— more accurately mimics how aspartame might affect people throughout their lifetimes. More studies, they say, should be done the same way. One of the signatories said that the Ramazzini studies "are the future".
In 2008, a study by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences endorsed the Ramazzini methodology, saying that extending animal bioassays beyond 2 years and beginning exposure in utero provides more reliable and appropriate indicators of human risk.
Morando Soffritti of the Ramazzini Foundation rejected the criticisms levelled at the ERF studies by Bernadene Magnuson, a reviewer paid by the aspartame industry, who exonerated the chemical in a controversial 2007 review (see below).
In 2011, the Ramazzini Foundation again linked aspartame to cancer. The new study looked at the effect of giving aspartame to mice. They were exposed to aspartame starting before their births (at 12 days of gestation) and lasting until their deaths. At that time, autopsies revealed a significantly increased risk of liver and lung cancer. According to the study in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine: "The results of the present study confirm that [aspartame] is a carcinogenic agent in multiple sites in rodents, and that this effect is induced in two species, rats (males and females) and mice (males)."
In 2007, a review study was published by a panel of experts, declaring aspartame to be "very safe". The panel was chosen by the Burdock Group, a consulting firm serving the food, dietary supplement, and cosmetics industries, which was in turn hired by Ajinomoto, the world's largest aspartame manufacturer. Michael F. Jacobson, executive director of the consumer group Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), said that the study was "totally unreliable" and that some members of the expert panel were "longstanding industry consultants". He also observed that the panel was highly accepting of studies finding aspartame safe, but highly critical of those linking aspartame to possible health risks. The panel coordinator responded that panel members were not told the name of the company funding the study until the study was submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
Critics ask whether the review has any credibility given that the authors have done paid work for Monsanto, several authors have official positions in trade and research associations funded by Monsanto, Ajinomoto, Coca Cola, and PepsiCo, several authors work for corporate advocacy groups, one of which called aspartame toxicity a 'nonissue' before the review was undertaken, and one author who consults for companies that sell aspartame and in the past has said that aspartame is safe. The chief scientist behind the review, Bernadene Magnuson, is a consultant to the aspartame and soft drink industry, and has travelled the world, funded by companies like Coca-Cola, to give reassuring lectures on the safety of aspartame.
A 2005 report in The Guardian stated that a 1996 review of aspartame research found that every single industry-funded study found aspartame safe, but 92% of independent studies identified one or more problems with its safety. The article referred to Ralph G. Walton, a professor of clinical psychiatry at Northeastern Ohio Universities Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy, who states that industry funding may have affected the conclusions of aspartame-related research. Walton states that researchers with ties to industry find no safety problems, while many of those without ties to aspartame find toxicities.
Also in 2005, the British Medical Journal published a letter that noted that "the glaring disparity in results from industry funded and independently funded research is clearly of considerable concern."
H.J. Roberts, MD, coined the term "aspartame disease" in a book filled with over 1,000 pages of information about the negative health consequences of ingesting aspartame. Dr. Roberts reports that by 1998, aspartame products were the cause of 80% of complaints to the FDA about food additives. Some of these symptoms include headache, dizziness, change in mood, vomiting or nausea, abdominal pain and cramps, change in vision, diarrhea, seizures/convulsions, memory loss, and fatigue. Along with these symptoms, links to aspartame are made for fibromyalgia symptoms, spasms, shooting pains, numbness in your legs, cramps, tinnitus, joint pain, unexplainable depression, anxiety attacks, slurred speech, blurred vision, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus, and various cancers.
Methanol and formaldehyde
Approximately 10% of aspartame (by mass) is broken down into methanol in the small intestine. Most of the methanol is absorbed and quickly converted into formaldehyde, known to be a human carcinogen, and then to formic acid. A study funded by the NutraSweet Company found that the metabolism of aspartame does not damage the body because: (a) the quantity of methanol produced is too small to disrupt normal physiological processes; (b) methanol and formaldehyde are natural by-products of human metabolism and are safely processed by various enzymes; (c) there is more methanol in some natural fruit juices and alcoholic beverages than is derived from aspartame ingestion; and (d) even large doses of pure methanol have been shown in non-human primate studies to lead to ample accumulation of formic acid (as formate), while no formaldehyde was detected.
However, in experiments on rodents given radiolabeled aspartame, formaldehyde-labeled adducts to protein and DNA accumulated in the brain, liver, kidneys and other tissues after ingestion of either 20 mg/kg or 200 mg/kg of aspartame. However, according to a study funded by NutraSweet, these scientists were not directly measuring formaldehyde, but simply measuring levels of some by-product of the methanol from aspartame.
Dr. Kenneth E. McMartin, a methanol expert and professor of pharmacology, toxicology and neuroscience at the Louisiana State University Medical Center, said he believed that it was unlikely that someone could consume enough aspartame to let harmful levels of formaldehyde build up in the body.
Aspartylphenylalanine diketopiperazine, a type of diketopiperazine (DKP), is created in products as aspartame breaks down over time. For example, researchers found that 6 months after aspartame was put into carbonated beverages, 25% of the aspartame had been converted to DKP.
Concern among some scientists has been expressed that this form of DKP would undergo a nitrosation process in the stomach producing a type of chemical that could cause brain tumors. However, a study funded by the NutraSweet Company found that the nitrosation of aspartame or the DKP in the stomach likely does not produce chemicals that cause brain tumors. In addition, only a minuscule amount of the nitrosated chemical can be produced. There are very few human studies on the effects of this form of DKP. However, a (one-day) exposure study showed that the DKP was tolerated without adverse effects.
A 2010 study of 59,334 pregnant Danish women showed that those having 1 or more servings of artificially sweetened drinks a day were found to be at a 38 per cent increased risk of pre-term delivery. Consumption of 4 or more servings a day was associated with an increased risk of 78 per cent. The conclusion was that daily intake of artificially sweetened soft drinks may increase the risk of preterm delivery. Length of gestation may be affected by exposure to methanol, a known nerve toxin, which can be metabolised in the body to form formic acid (another nerve toxin), as well as formaldehyde (which is what is used to preserve dead bodies). These are all constituents of aspartame (the most ubiquitous artificial sweetener).
Fibromyalgia, a condition is characterized by pain and tenderness in the muscles, can be caused by aspartame. Aspartame is an excitotoxin can lead to neurotoxicity, says a 2001 study. A 2010 study advises that practitioners should ask patients suffering from fibromyalgia about their intake of aspartame. In some cases, this simple question might lead to the resolution of a disabling chronic disease, the study states.
A 2007 study, published in Diabetes Care, that measured blood levels of insulin, found that aspartame causes a spike in insulin level after consumption, inducing a similar rise in glucose and insulin levels at baseline to the sucrose meal. This could lead to insulin resistance and possibly type II diabetes.
A 2011 study showed that heavy aspartame exposure could directly contribute to increased blood glucose levels, and thus contribute to the associations observed between diet soda consumption and the risk of diabetes in humans.
Vestibular and cochlear toxicity
Aspartame may have idiosyncratic toxic effects for some people in the areas of vestibular and cochlear functioning. Such cases present with a history of nausea and headache, progressively getting worse with time and eventually involving vomiting, vertigo (dizziness), and ataxia (clumsiness, loss of co-ordination). Some cases also involve tinnitus (ringing in the ears) and high frequency hearing loss. Symptoms are reversible on cessation of consumption.
Fifty percent of aspartame by mass is broken down into phenylalanine. Some studies show effects on neurotransmitter levels in the brain or changes in seizure thresholds. Adverse effects of phenylalanine on fetuses have been observed only when blood phenylalanine levels remain at high levels as opposed to spiking occasionally.
A 1987 study found that consumption of dietary phenylalanine in the usual way, as a constituent of protein, does not elevate brain phenylalanine levels because the protein elevates plasma levels of the other large neutral amino acids (LNAA) (valine, leucine, isoleucine, tryptophan, tyrosine) more than those of phenylalanine. In contrast, consumption of phenylalanine in the form of aspartame elevates plasma phenylalanine levels without elevating those of the other LNAA, and this causes marked elevations in the plasma phenylalanine ratio (the ratio of the plasma phenylalanine concentration to the summed concentrations of the other LNAA). The study noted that aspartame is "probably the only phenylalanine-containing food that man has ever eaten which elevates this ratio". An elevation in the plasma phenylalanine ratio causes a parallel rise in brain phenylalanine levels and also tends to reduce the corresponding ratios for the other LNAA, thus decreasing their brain uptakes and tending to lower their brain levels.
A 1991 study showed that the intake of aspartame in a "not unrealistically high dose" produced a "marked and persistent increase of the availability of phenylalanine to the brain".
Dr. Richard Wurtman, a neuroscientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said that while bananas, milk and NutraSweet all contain phenylalanine, one of 21 amino acids that form the "building blocks" of protein, there is more to the story. Wurtman said because aspartame lacks other important amino acids normally found in foods, the brain absorbs unusually high levels of phenylalanine that could increase the likelihood of epileptic seizures. Dr. Louis Elsas, director of medical genetics at Emory University, groans at the industry arguments that eating or drinking NutraSweet (aspartame) is just like eating a hamburger, saying that "Phenylalanine is a known toxin to the brain. Aspartame is phenylalanine, and drinking aspartame is like drinking phenylalanine as an individual amino acid."
Headache and migraine
Aspartame has been linked to headache and migraine in susceptible individuals. Dr. Walton, a professor of psychiatry at Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, states that aspartame's phenylalanine component could upset the body's balance of neurotransmitters, causing a range of neurological symptoms. Phenylalanine is a suspected migraine trigger. A University of Washington study concluded that some people are particularly susceptible to headaches caused by aspartame and may want to limit their consumption. Three randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled studies with more than 200 adult migraine sufferers showed that headaches were more frequent and more severe in the aspartame-treated group.
In 1994, a double-blind study was halted by the Institutional Review Board when eight patients with acute depression exhibited an increased expression of their symptoms after they consumed aspartame. On this basis, the authors of the study recommended that patients with unipolar depression avoid the sweetener.
Mental disorders, learning and emotional functioning
A 2008 study that looked at the direct and indirect cellular effects of aspartame on the brain proposed that excessive aspartame ingestion might be involved in the pathogenesis of certain mental disorders and also in compromised learning and emotional functioning.
Activity of the brain neurotransmitter acetylcholinesterase is markedly reduced in rats fed large amounts of aspartame. This result was replicated in human in vitro tests, and the authors concluded that "neurological symptoms, including learning and memory processes, may be related to the high or toxic concentrations of the sweetener metabolites".
Aspartame has a "relatively potent" effect in decreasing brain dopamine levels when given in very high doses to rats.
40% of aspartame by mass is broken down into aspartic acid (aspartate), an amino acid. At high concentrations, aspartate can act as an excitotoxin, inflicting damage on brain and nerve cells.
In patients with epilepsy, excessive intake of aspartame can decrease the threshold for seizures or prolong them once they appear. However, if the intake is not above the recommended level of 40 mg/kg b.w./day, aspartame is well tolerated in this subpopulation. Aspartame appears to exacerbate the amount of EEG spike wave in children with absence seizures. Although there are reports of seizure after intake of large amounts of aspartame, intakes over 1g/day were needed to alter brain neurotransmitters and provoke seizures in monkeys.
In 1992, the US Air Force magazine Flying Safety published an article which expressed concerns about the effect of aspartame on pilots, and warned that some pilots who drink diet sodas containing aspartame could be more susceptible to conditions ranging from flicker vertigo to gradual loss of vision.
Movie Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World
In 2004 a movie called Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World was released and distributed through Cinema Libre Studio. Narrator Cori Brackett believes her inability to walk and speak, which faded after she stopped ingesting aspartame, show the chemical is dangerous.
- Ingredients -- Neotame. sci-toys.com (2012 [last update]). Retrieved on 29 March 2012.
- U.S. GAO - HRD-87-46 Food and Drug Administration: Food Additive Approval Process Followed for Aspartame, June 18, 1987. Retrieved on 2008-09-05.
- Sugarman, Carole (1983-07-03). "Controversy Surrounds Sweetener", Washington Post, pp. D1–2. Retrieved on 2008-11-25.
- Henkel J (1999). "Sugar substitutes. Americans opt for sweetness and lite". FDA Consumer Magazine 33 (6): 12–6. DIANE Publishing. PMID 10628311.
- Artificial Sweeteners Symptoms, Causes, Treatment - Aspartame: What is the negative side on MedicineNet. www.medicinenet.com. Retrieved on 2010-06-29.
- Do you love aspartame? How sweet it isn’t. www.gazette.net. Retrieved on 2010-07-08.
- Soffritti, Morando; Belpoggi, Fiorella; Manservigi, Marco; Tibaldi, Eva; Lauriola, Michelina; Falcioni, Laura; Bua, Luciano (Dec 2010). "Aspartame administered in feed, beginning prenatally through life span, induces cancers of the liver and lung in male Swiss mice". Am J Ind Med 53 (12): 1197-206. PMID 20886530.
- foodconsumer.org - Eating Foods Laced with this Common Ingredient? It Could be Slowly and Silently Harming You (2011-06-26). Retrieved on 2011-06-26.
- Waistlines in people, glucose levels in mice hint at sweeteners' effects: Related studies point to the illusion of the artificial. sciencedaily.com (2011 [last update]). Retrieved on 3 September 2011.
- Health Canada: Aspartame - Artificial Sweeteners. Retrieved on 2008-11-08.
- Food Standards Australia New Zealand: Food Standards Australia New Zealand: Aspartame (September 2007). Retrieved on 2008-11-08.
- Corsi, Hector (2012 [last update]). Study: Aspartame linked to blood cancers. digitaljournal.com. Retrieved on 9 November 2012.
- Rycerz, Karol; Jaworska-Adamu, Jadwiga E (2013). "Effects of aspartame metabolites on astrocytes and neurons". Folia Neuropathol 51 (1): 10-7. PMID 23553132.
- Jimmy Downs (2013). Is aspartame toxic?. FoodConsumer.org. Retrieved on 2013-05-13.
- World's top sweetener is made with GM bacteria - News - The Independent. www.independent.co.uk. Retrieved on 2010-11-19.
- "Determination of aspartame and its major decomposition products in foods." . J AOAC Int 76 (2): 275-82.
- "Simultaneous formation and detection of the reaction product of solid-state aspartame sweetener by FT-IR/DSC microscopic system." (Oct 2000). Food Addit Contam 17 (10): 821-7.
- "Investigation of solid-state reactions using variable temperature X-ray powder diffractrometry. I. Aspartame hemihydrate." (Mar 2001). Pharm Res 18 (3): 267-73.
- Roberts HJ (2004). "Aspartame disease: a possible cause for concomitant Graves' disease and pulmonary hypertension". Texas Heart Institute Journal 31 (1): 105; author reply 105–6. PMID 15061638.
- Trocho C, Pardo R, Rafecas I, et al. (1998). "Formaldehyde derived from dietary aspartame binds to tissue components in vivo". Life Sciences 63 (5): 337–49. doi:10.1016/S0024-3205(98)00282-3. PMID 9714421.
- Cancer effects of formaldehyde: a proposal for an indoor air guideline value. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved on 2010-06-19.
- "Aspartame decomposition and epimerization in the diketopiperazine and dipeptide products as a function of pH and temperature" (1988). The Journal of Organic Chemistry 53: 2757–64. doi:10.1021/jo00247a018.
- "How Sweet Is It?".
- Cockburn A. (2007). Rumsfeld: His Rise, Fall, and Catastrophic Legacy. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 9781416535744.
- "DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION" (31 January 1989) 135 (8).
- Andy Pasztor and Joe Davidson (7 February 1986). "Two Ex-U.S. Prosecutors' Roles in Case Against Searle Are Questioned in Probe".
- Joyce Gemperlein (February 1986). Investigation alleges prosecutors froze NutraSweet review. Boca Raton News. Retrieved on 2010-06-27.
- Santa Fe Pediatrician Ken Stoller Asks FDA to Rescind Aspartame's Approval. www.opednews.com. Retrieved on 2010-06-27.
- Yeshiva University Observer - Artificial Sweeteners: Not Such a Sweet Deal After All. www.yuobserver.com. Retrieved on 2010-07-12.
- Robert Walters (August 1985). Debate continues over aspartame. Park City Daily News. Retrieved on 2010-06-27.
- ZCommunications. www.zcommunications.org. Retrieved on 2010-07-09.
- Food safety authority says aspartame not linked to cancer. guardian.co.uk. Retrieved on 2010-07-08.
- No one in the frame as abuse is outsourced - Opinion - www.smh.com.au. smh.com.au. Retrieved on 2010-06-27.
- How Aspartame Became Legal - The Timeline. www.rense.com. Retrieved on 2010-07-09.
- Ishii H (March 1981). "Incidence of brain tumors in rats fed aspartame". Toxicol. Lett. 7 (6): 433–7. doi:10.1016/0378-4274(81)90089-8. PMID 7245229.
- FDA Statement on Aspartame - Food Industry News. www.flex-news-food.com. Retrieved on 2010-06-27.
- GAO 1986. "Six Former HHS Employees' Involvement in Aspartame's Approval." United States General Accounting Office, GAO/HRD-86-109BR, July 1986.
- "The Lowdown on Sweet?" The New York Times, 12 February 2006
- Monograph on Aspartame, 1980, JECFA. Retrieved on 2008-12-08.
- Diet drinks lose out to sugary alternatives - Ministry of Health - NZ Herald News. www.nzherald.co.nz. Retrieved on 2010-06-27.
- "Indonesia consults on aspartame, sweetener use in food", AP-Foodtechnology.com (9 January 2007).
- "Lawmaker wants artificial sweeteners banned", SunStar (Philippines) (4 September 2004).
- House bill 391: Relating to food; Banning the use of the artificial sweetener Aspartame in food products. State of New Mexico Legislature (2007).
- "New Mexico State Senator Calls for Ban on Aspartame Artificial Sweetener", Organic Consumers Association (28 September 2006).
- "New Mexico - Bill Introduced to Ban Aspartame in Foods", American Bakers Association.
- "22 members of Hawaii House of Representatives Sign Resolution asking FDA to Rescind Approval for Neurotoxic Aspartame", OpEdNews (20 March 2009). Commentary.
- "Prioritization: Chemicals for Consultation by the Carcinogen Identification Committee", California EPA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (5 March 2009).
- "Sainsbury's takes the chemicals out of cola", Daily Mail (23 april 2007).
- "M&S and Asda to axe E-numbers", Daily Telegraph (17 May 2007). Retrieved on 2010-04-25.
- "Asda becomes first supermarket to axe all artificial flavourings and colours in own brand foods", Daily Mail (14 May 2007).
- "M&S joins race to ban artificial additives from their food", Daily Mail (15 May 2007).
- Ajinomoto Sweetners Europe SAS vs. Asda Stores Limited.
- "Ajinomoto to Sue Asda over Aspartame Slur", FLEXNEWS (7 May 2009).
- Sweet court victory for Asda. Yorkshire Evening Post. Retrieved on 2010-06-27.
- Asda claims victory in aspartame ‘nasty’ case. Foodnavigator.com. Retrieved on 2010-06-27.
- "Woolies ousts aspartame in own foods" (2 July 2009).
- B.C. schools say no to artificial sweeteners. www.merrittnews.net. Retrieved on 2010-06-29.
- Sample, Ian (2009-09-23). "Sweetener aspartame to be investigated for possible side-effects", The Guardian. Retrieved on 2010-04-25.
- Food Standards Agency - Aspartame study to begin. www.food.gov.uk. Retrieved on 2010-11-19.
- Questions over the European Food Safety Authority - Public Service Europe. publicserviceeurope.com (2011 [last update]). Retrieved on 22 September 2011.
- European Safety Review of Aspartame a Whitewash, Says CSPI. Center for Science in the Public Interest (2013). Retrieved on 2014-11-22.
- "Aspartame and Cancer: Questions and Answers", National Cancer Institute
- Wing Sum Tsang, Margaret A. Clarke, and Frederick W. Parrish (1985). "Determination of aspartame and its breakdown products in soft drinks by reverse-phase chromatography with UV detection". Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 33: 734–738. doi:10.1021/jf00064a043.
- Olney JW, Farber NB, Spitznagel E, Robins LN (November 1996). "Increasing brain tumor rates: is there a link to aspartame?". J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 55 (11): 1115–23. doi:10.1097/00005072-199611000-00002. PMID 8939194. Retrieved on 2008-12-08.
- Soffritti M, Belpoggi F, Degli Esposti D, Lambertini L, Tibaldi E, Rigano A (March 2006). "First experimental demonstration of the multipotential carcinogenic effects of aspartame administered in the feed to Sprague-Dawley rats". Environ. Health Perspect. 114 (3): 379–85. doi:10.1289/ehp.8711. PMID 16507461. PMC:1392232.
- "No cancer risk found in diet soda's aspartame", Seattle Post-Intelligencer (5 April 2006).
- Lim U, Subar AF, Mouw T, et al. (September 2006). "Consumption of aspartame-containing beverages and incidence of hematopoietic and brain malignancies". Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 15 (9): 1654–9. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0203. PMID 16985027. “Our findings from this epidemiologic study suggest that consumption of aspartame-containing beverages does not raise the risk of hematopoietic or brain malignancies.” Funding source: Intramural Research Program of the NIH, the National Cancer Institute
- Adrienne Samuels (1 July 2007). "Letters to the Editor:Aspartame Consumption and Incidence of Hematopoietic and Brain Cancers". Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 16 (7). doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0294. PMID 17627023.
- Davis, Devra Lee; Ganter , Leanne; Weinkle, Jonathan (2008-05-01). "Aspartame and Incidence of Brain Malignancies". Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 17 (5): 1295–6. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2869. PMID 18483354. Retrieved on 2009-05-07.
- "The effect of aspartame administration on oncogene and suppressor gene expressions." (2007). In Vivo 21 (1): 89–92. PMID 17354619.
- "In vivo cytogenetic studies on aspartame." (2010). Comp Funct Genomics. doi:10.1155/2010/605921.
- Life-Span Exposure to Low Doses of Aspartame Beginning during Prenatal Life Increases Cancer Effects in Rats. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved on 2010-06-27.
- First Experimental Demonstration of the Multipotential Carcinogenic Effects of Aspartame Administered in the Feed to Sprague-Dawley Rats. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved on 2010-06-27.
- "Results of long-term carcinogenicity bioassay on Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to aspartame administered in feed." (Sep 2006). Ann N Y Acad Sci 1076: 559-77. doi:10.1196/annals.1371.080.
- US FDA/CFSAN - FDA Statement on European Aspartame Study. Retrieved on 2009-02-28.
- Samuel S. Epstein: An Overdue Ban On A Dangerous Sweetener. www.huffingtonpost.com. Retrieved on 2010-06-20.
- Abdo KM, Camargo CA, Davis D, et al. (October 2007). "Letter to U.S. FDA commissioner. Questions about the safety of the artificial sweetener aspartame". Int J Occup Environ Health 13 (4): 449–50. PMID 18085059.
- Huff J, LaDou J (October-Dec 2007). "Aspartame bioassay findings portend human cancer hazards". International journal of occupational and environmental health 13 (4). PMID 18085058.
- With faux sugars, real suspicion - latimes.com. www.latimes.com. Retrieved on 2010-06-27.
- Environmental Health Perspectives: The Limits of Two-Year Bioassay Exposure Regimens for Identifying Chemical Carcinogens. ehp03.niehs.nih.gov. Retrieved on 2010-07-11.
- Carcinogenicity of Aspartame: Soffritti Responds. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved on 2010-09-03.
- Soffritti et al (2010). "Aspartame administered in feed, beginning prenatally through life span, induces cancers of the liver and lung in male Swiss mice". American Journal of Industrial Medicine 53 (12): pp. 1197–1206.
- Magnuson BA, Burdock GA, Doull J, et al. (2007). "Aspartame: a safety evaluation based on current use levels, regulations, and toxicological and epidemiological studies". Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 37 (8): 629–727. doi:10.1080/10408440701516184. PMID 17828671.
- Expert Panel: Aspartame Sweetener Safe. www.webmd.com. Retrieved on 2010-06-24.
- Carcinogenicity of Aspartame: Soffritti Responds. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved on 2010-06-25.
- Aspartame and Manufacturer-Funded Scientific Reviews. www.holisticmed.com. Retrieved on 2010-07-11.
- Mission Possible World Health International on Aspartame. www.mpwhi.com. Retrieved on 2010-07-11.
- Potentially Harmful Myths About Diet Products. www.scoop.co.nz. Retrieved on 2011-01-08.
- Safety of artificial sweetener called into question by MP. guardian.co.uk. Retrieved on 2010-06-24.
- OpEdNews - Article: New York Psychiatrist Exhorts FDA to Rescind Artificial Sweetener Aspartame Approval. www.opednews.com. Retrieved on 2010-06-24.
- Ralph G. Walton, M.D.. www.neoucom.edu. Retrieved on 2010-06-26.
- "Safety of artificial sweetener called into question by MP" The Guardian, 15 December 2005
- "Aspartame and its effects on health: independently funded studies have found potential for adverse effects." (Feb 2005). BMJ 330 (7486): 309-10; author reply 310. doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7486.309-a.
- Artificial Sweeteners Symptoms, Causes, Treatment - Aspartame: What is the negative side on MedicineNet. www.medicinenet.com. Retrieved on 2010-08-31.
- Cancer effects of formaldehyde: a proposal for an indoor air guideline value. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved on 2010-06-19.
- Trocho C, Pardo R, Rafecas I, Virgili J, Remesar X, Fernández-López JA, Alemany M (1998). "Formaldehyde derived from dietary aspartame binds to tissue components in vivo". Life sciences 63 (5): 337–349. doi:10.1016/S0024-3205(98)00282-3. PMID 9714421.
- Butchko HH, Stargel WW, Comer CP, et al. (April 2002). "Aspartame: review of safety". Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 35 (2 Pt 2): S1–93. doi:10.1006/rtph.2002.1542. PMID 12180494.
- Abel Lajtha, Margaret A. Reilly and David S. Dunlop (June 1994). "Aspartame consumption: lack of effects on neural function". The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 5 (6): 266–283. Elsevier Science Inc.. doi:10.1016/0955-2863(94)90032-9.
- McMartin KE, Martin-Amat G, Noker PE, Tephly TR (March 1979). "Lack of a role for formaldehyde in methanol poisoning in the monkey". Biochem. Pharmacol. 28 (5): 645–9. doi:10.1016/0006-2952(79)90149-7. PMID 109089.
- Shephard SE, Wakabayashi K, Nagao M (May 1993). "Mutagenic activity of peptides and the artificial sweetener aspartame after nitrosation". Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 31 (5): 323–9. PMID 8505016.
- Flamm WG (January 1997). ""Increasing brain tumor rates: is there a link to aspartame?"". Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology 56 (1): 105–6. doi:10.1097/00005072-199701000-00014. PMID 8990134.
- Geha R, Buckley CE, Greenberger P, et al. (October 1993). "Aspartame is no more likely than placebo to cause urticaria/angioedema: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study". The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 92 (4): 513–20. doi:10.1016/0091-6749(93)90075-Q. PMID 8409113.
- "Intake of artificially sweetened soft drinks and risk of preterm delivery: a prospective cohort study of 59,334 Danish pregnant women." (Jun 2010). Am J Clin Nutr. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.28968.
- Do sweeteners bring on early birth? How fizzy drinks can harm an unborn child. www.dailymail.co.uk. Retrieved on 2010-07-11.
- Artificial sweeteners linked with pre-term delivery. www.drbriffa.com. Retrieved on 2010-07-11.
- "Aspartame-induced fibromyalgia, an unusual but curable cause of chronic pain." . Clin Exp Rheumatol 28 (6 Suppl 63): S131-3.
- "Relief of fibromyalgia symptoms following discontinuation of dietary excitotoxins." (Jun 2001). Ann Pharmacother 35 (6): 702-6.
- Is Aspartame Really Safer in Reducing the Risk of Hypoglycemia During Exercise in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes? — Diabetes Care. care.diabetesjournals.org. Retrieved on 2010-06-20.
- News,University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. HSC NEWS - Related studies point to the illusion of the artificial. Retrieved on 2011-07-04.
- Vestibulocochlear toxicity in a pair of siblings 15 years apart secondary to aspartame: two case reports. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved on 2010-06-24.
- "Aspartame and dizziness: preliminary results of a prospective, nonblinded, prevalence and attempted cross-over study." (Sep 1992). Am J Otol 13 (5): 438–42. PMID 1443079.
- Koeppe RA, Shulkin BL, Rosenspire KC, et al. (May 1991). "Effect of aspartame-derived phenylalanine on neutral amino acid uptake in human brain: a positron emission tomography study". Journal of neurochemistry 56 (5): 1526–35. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1991.tb02047.x. PMID 2013754.
- Romano M, Diomede L, Guiso G, Caccia S, Perego C, Salmona M (May 1990). "Plasma and brain kinetics of large neutral amino acids and of striatum monoamines in rats given aspartame". Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 28 (5): 317–21. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2007.02.043. PMID 2379890.
- Dailey JW, Lasley SM, Mishra PK, Bettendorf AF, Burger RL, Jobe PC (May 1989). "Aspartame fails to facilitate pentylenetetrazol-induced convulsions in CD-1 mice". Toxicology and applied pharmacology 98 (3): 475–86. doi:10.1016/0041-008X(89)90176-2. PMID 2470165.
- London RS (January 1988). "Saccharin and aspartame. Are they safe to consume during pregnancy?". The Journal of reproductive medicine 33 (1): 17–21. PMID 3351801.
- Timothy J. Maher and Richard J. Wurtman (1987). "Possible Neurologic Effects of Aspartame, a Widely Used Food Additive". Environmental Health Perspectives 75: 53–57.
- "Effect of aspartame and protein, administered in phenylalanine-equivalent doses, on plasma neutral amino acids, aspartate, insulin and glucose in man." (May 1991). Pharmacol Toxicol 68 (5): 408–12. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0773.1991.tb01262.x. PMID 1946186.
- UPI (October 1987). The Selling of a Sweetener. UPI (The Bryan Times). Retrieved on 2010-06-27.
- "Aspartame ingestion and headaches: a randomized crossover trial." (Oct 1994). Neurology 44 (10): 1787-93.
- Sun-Edelstein C, Mauskop A (2009). "Foods and supplements in the management of migraine headaches". Clin J Pain 25 (5): 446–52. doi:10.1097/AJP.0b013e31819a6f65. PMID 19454881.
- "Chewing gum headaches." . Headache 37 (10): 665-6.
- "Migraine MLT-down: an unusual presentation of migraine in patients with aspartame-triggered headaches." (Oct 2001). Headache 41 (9): 899–901. PMID 11703479.
- "Formaldehyde, aspartame, and migraines: a possible connection." (2008). Dermatitis 19 (3): E10–1. PMID 18627677.
- "Foods and supplements in the management of migraine headaches." (Jun 2009). Clin J Pain 25 (5): 446–52. doi:10.1097/AJP.0b013e31819a6f65. PMID 19454881.
- "The diet factor in pediatric and adolescent migraine." (Jan 2003). Pediatr Neurol 28 (1): 9–15. doi:10.1016/S0887-8994(02)00466-6. PMID 12657413.
- "Aspartame as a dietary trigger of headache." (Feb 1989). Headache 29 (2): 90–2. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.1989.hed2902090.x. PMID 2708042.
- "Aspartame and its effects on health: readers may prefer balanced and impartial editorials." (Feb 2005). BMJ 330 (7486): 310; author reply 310. doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7486.310.
- "[Diet and migraine]" (May 1996). Rev Neurol 24 (129): 534-8.
- Walton RG, Hudak R, Green-Waite RJ (1993). "Adverse reactions to aspartame: double-blind challenge in patients from a vulnerable population". Biol. Psychiatry 34 (1-2): 13–7. doi:10.1016/0006-3223(93)90251-8. PMID 8373935.
- "Direct and indirect cellular effects of aspartame on the brain." (Apr 2008). Eur J Clin Nutr 62 (4): 451–62. doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602866. PMID 17684524.
- "The effect of aspartame metabolites on the suckling rat frontal cortex acetylcholinesterase. An in vitro study." (Dec 2007). Food Chem Toxicol 45 (12): 2397–401. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2007.06.016. PMID 17673349.
- "The effect of aspartame metabolites on human erythrocyte membrane acetylcholinesterase activity." (Jan 2006). Pharmacol Res 53 (1): 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2005.07.006. PMID 16129618.
- "Aspartame decreases evoked extracellular dopamine levels in the rat brain: an in vivo voltammetry study." (Dec 2007). Neuropharmacology 53 (8): 967–74. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2007.09.009. PMID 17976663.
- Olney, J. (1994). "Excitotoxins in Foods". Neurotoxicology 15 (3): 535–544. PMID 7854587.
- Olney JW, Ho OL (August 1970). "Brain damage in infant mice following oral intake of glutamate, aspartate or cysteine". Nature 227 (5258): 609–11. doi:10.1038/227609b0. PMID 5464249.
- "[Controversies with aspartame]" (2003). Med Pregl 56 Suppl 1: 27-9.
- "Aspartame and seizure susceptibility: results of a clinical study in reportedly sensitive individuals." (Mar 1995). Epilepsia 36 (3): 270-5.
- "Seizures and hyponatremia after excessive intake of diet coke." (Feb 2008). Eur J Emerg Med 15 (1): 51. doi:10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3282703645.
- "Aspartame and its effects on health." (Oct 2004). BMJ 329 (7469): 755-6. doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7469.755.
- "Aspartame alert" (May 1992). Flying Safety 48 (5): 20–1. excerpt from Navy Physiology
- Sweet Remedy: Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World. sweetremedyfilm.blogspot.com. Retrieved on 2011-01-09.
- RESIDENTS WARN OF 'DANGERS' OF ASPARTAME - Eastbourne Today. www.eastbourneherald.co.uk. Retrieved on 2010-06-24.
- Doug Monroe (2007). "Tenancious B". Atlanta Magazine (August): pp. 52–56. Emmis Communications.
- Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World (2004) (V) - Plot Summary. www.imdb.com. Retrieved on 2010-06-24.