Judith Miller
New York Times reporter Judith Miller has played a key role in promoting both U.S. wars against Iraq. In 2004 it was revealed that she was one of the reporters informed by a White House official that Valerie Plame was an undercover CIA agent.
Contents
Miller and the Outing of Valerie Plame
In August 2004, Miller was subpoenaed by a Washington grand jury, headed by U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald, who was investigating the leaking to Robert Novak and other journalists that Valerie Plame, the wife of former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, was an undercover CIA officer. [1] Miller was researching a story on Plame but in the end did not write a story on her role as a CIA agent.
An Earlier Encounter Miller and Fitzgerald
On April 6, 2004, Josh Marshall reported how U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald of Chicago "had quite aggressively investigated another Bush White House leak in late 2001 and early 2002. Fitzgerald had been investigating three Islamic charities accused of supporting terrorism -- the Holy Land Foundation, the Global Relief Foundation, and the Benevolence International Foundation. But just before his investigators could swoop in with warrants [December 14, 2001], two of the charities in question got wind of what was coming and, apparently, were able to destroy a good deal of evidence.
"What tipped them off were calls from two reporters at the New York Times who'd been leaked information about the investigation by folks at the White House. One of those two reporters was Judy Miller," he wrote. The other was New York Times reporter Philip Shenon. [2]
Marshall's point in April 2004 wasn't that "the White House did something else wrong," in fact, he wrote, he was "told that in this case the White House really hadn't done anything improper at all." However, "Fitzgerald was pissed and apparently went after them very aggressively -- and this for a case in which," he was told, "there really wasn't much to go after," which "might be something to keep in mind when figuring how the Plame investigation might play out." [3]
Miller The Martyr
In October 2004, U.S. District Judge Thomas Hogan found Miller in contempt for refusing to provide evidence to a grand jury on who leaked the name of Valerie Plame to the Robert Novak last year. Hogan sentenced Miller to 18 months imprisonment but she remained free until an appeal was heard. Her appeal to the Supreme Court was unsuccessful.
In July 2005, after Time magazine reporter Matthew Cooper agreed to testify about his sources, Miller was jailed for the duration of the grand jury investigation. [4]
While major journalism groups held Miller up as a defender of the right of journalists to protect their sources, others viewed her actions more sceptically. "Sources tell me," Arianna Huffington wrote October 3, 2005, "that Judy Miller is telling friends that she has made a $1.2 million book deal with Simon & Schuster. I’ve heard from senior editors at the publishing house that the deal is still so hush-hush that word of it has not appeared in the memos that circulate among the editorial staff, keeping them updated on pending deals and acquisitions."
"What would Miller’s angle be?," Huffington asked: "'I helped the bad guys sell a bogus war that led to tens of thousands of deaths, then went to jail to protect my neocon pals?'"
After serving 85 days in federal detention, Miller said that she had clearance from her source to disclose their identity - I. Lewis Scooter Libby - and the details of their July 2003 conversations. Her testimony once again threw a "damaging spotlight" on the White House, "whose credibility has been undermined" in the criminal probe into the leak which outed Plame, the Associated Press reported.
After offering to testify a federal judge in the CIA leak investigation lifted a contempt order against Miller, "clearing the way for the newspaper to fulfill its promise to publish a full account of Miller's conversations with Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff. In grand jury testimony, Miller has detailed three contacts she had with I. Lewis Libby in June and July 2003 about former U.S. ambassador Joseph Wilson and his wife, covert CIA officer Valerie Plame," Associated Press writer Pete Yost reported October 13, 2005.
"The outcome could shake up the Bush White House, already reeling from criticism over its response to Hurricane Katrina" and the indictments of House Republican leader Tom DeLay. "The leak investigation has ensnarled Bush's top political adviser, Karl Rove, as well as Libby. The White House had long maintained that they had nothing to do with the leak." [5]
Miller Testifies
Miller testified before a grand jury on Friday, September 30, 2005, agreeing "to break her silence ... after receiving what she described as a voluntary and personal waiver of confidentiality from her source," who was identified as Libby. [6]
Joseph A. Tate, the attorney for Lewis Libby, "escalated the sharp dispute over exactly when Libby freed Miller to be questioned by special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald."
Tate said October 3, 2005, "that New York Times reporter Judith Miller and her attorneys are responsible for Miller's 85 days in jail, reiterating that she was given permission a year ago to tell a prosecutor about private conversations she had with Libby," R. Jeffrey Smith reported in the Washington Post.
===Miller "Discovered" 2003 Notes with Libby===
Miller said she discovered notes about a June 2003 conversation she had with Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, Lewis "Scooter" Libby "after her testimony before the grand jury last week," sources said October 7, 2005.
"Miller turned the [redacted] notes over to federal prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald and is expected to meet him again" October 11th. "Miller's notes could help Fitzgerald establish that Libby had started talking to reporters about CIA operative Valerie Plame and her diplomat husband, Joseph Wilson, weeks before Wilson publicly criticized the administration's Iraq policy in a [July 6, 2003,] Times opinion piece ...
"One source involved in the investigation said Miller's notes could help Fitzgerald show a long-running and orchestrated campaign to discredit Wilson, which could help form the basis for a conspiracy charge." [7]
Subsequently, the New York Times published three stories about Miller's testimony to the grand jury. The stories include Miller's |first-person recounting of what she told the grand jury, a |chronology of the Miller case, and an |analysis suggesting that I. Lewis Scooter Libby, an aide to Vice President Dick Cheney, may still be a focus of the criminal investigation.
Miller's own account of her testimony contains some notable ambiguities, such as her inability to remember how a misspelled mention of Plame's name wound up in her notebook from an interview with Libby.
And in an independent critique, Norman Solomon points out some disturbing details in Miller's account, such as her admission that she was given "clearance" by the Pentagon "to see secret information” which she “was not permitted to discuss" with her own editors. [8]
"There’s nothing wrong with this picture if Judith Miller is an intelligence operative for the U.S. government," Solomon states. "But if she’s supposed to be a journalist, this is a preposterous situation -- and the fact that The New York Times has tolerated it tells us a lot about that newspaper." [9]
"New" Strange Tale of Miller & the Military
Miller "acted as a 'middleman' between an American military unit and the Iraqi National Congress while she was embedded with the U.S. armed forces searching for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq in April 2003, and 'took custody' of Saddam Hussein's son-in-law, one of 55 most wanted Iraqis," The Raw Story reported October 18, 2005.
Miller also "sat in on the initial debriefing of Jamal Sultan Tikriti, according to a June 25, 2003 article published in the Washington Post.
"The Post article sheds some light on her unusual arrangement in obtaining a special security clearance from the Department of Defense which is now the subject of a Democratic congressional inquiry. On Monday, [October 17, 2005,] Reps. John Conyers and Ira Skelton, the ranking Democrats on the House Judiciary and Armed Services committees sent Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld a letter demanding an explanation to Miller’s top secret security clearance, which Rumsfeld reportedly personally authorized."
The Raw Story said that the "Post article raises an important question about her role in the outing of a covert CIA agent: was Miller, whose flawed reporting on the existence of WMD’s was scrutinized in mainstream newspapers, truly meeting with Libby in the hopes of pursuing a hot story or was she trying to get information out of him that would help restore her credibility and cover up her errors?"
Miller and the Gulf Wars
During the first U.S.-led war in the Persian Gulf, Miller co-wrote a book with Laurie Mylroie, titled Saddam Hussein and the Crisis in the Gulf.
Miller and Mylroie have both been clients of Eleana Benador, whose PR firm has represented many leading pro-war figures that have appeared prominently on television and in other public venues. She has also worked closely and uncritically with Ahmed Chalabi, the head of the Iraqi National Congress, in developing her reports on Iraq. In a May 2003 e-mail message, Miller stated that Chalabi "has provided most of the front page exclusives on [alleged Iraqi weapons of mass destruction] to our paper."
Miller played an important role in promoting the presidential team's agenda on Iraq. Indeed, she wrote the first article, entitled «Threats and Responses : The Iraqis ; U.S. Says Hussein Intensifies Quest for A-Bomb Parts», on Saddam Hussein's WMD programme, mentioning "aluminium tubes" which could be used for nuclear weapons. That was on September 7, less than two weeks after Vice-President Dick Cheney delivered the first speech in which he presented Iraq as Washington's next target. [10]. It is therefore possible to think that she played a role in the public relations campaign that was led by the Bush administration on Iraq, directed by Andrew Card.
In June 2003, Washington Post reporter Howard Kurtz noted that "Miller played a highly unusual role in an Army unit assigned to search for dangerous Iraqi weapons, according to U.S. military officials, prompting criticism that the unit was turned into what one official called a 'rogue operation.' More than a half-dozen military officers said that Miller acted as a middleman between the Army unit with which she was embedded and Iraqi National Congress leader Ahmed Chalabi, on one occasion accompanying Army officers to Chalabi's headquarters, where they took custody of Saddam Hussein's son-in-law. She also sat in on the initial debriefing of the son-in-law, these sources say. Since interrogating Iraqis was not the mission of the unit, these officials said, it became a 'Judith Miller team,' in the words of one officer close to the situation." [11]
The links of Judith Miller with the Pentagon are not new. In 1986, she wrote numerous articles on Libya, thus contributing to a massive disinformation campaign on Khadafi which was coordinated by Admiral John Poindexter. Bob Woodward has written a major article in the Washington Post on this strategy.
Related SourceWatch Resources
External links
2003
- Jack Schafer, "Reassessing Miller," Slate, May 29, 2003.
- John Macarthur, "The Lies We Bought", Columbia Journalism Review, May/June 2003.
- Howard Kurtz, "Embedded Reporter's Role In Army Unit's Actions Questioned by Military," Washington Post, June 25, 2003.
- Jack Shafer, "The Times Scoops That Melted: Cataloging the wretched reporting of Judith Miller", Slate, July 25, 2003.
- Alexander Cockburn, "Judy Miller's War", Counterpunch, August 18, 2003.
2004
- John F. Dickerson and Viveca Novak, "The CIA Agent Flap: FBI Asks for Reporters to Talk. Investigators are pressing Administration officials to let journalists tell whatever they know about the leak of a CIA agent's identity," TIME.com, January 2, 2004.
- "CIA Leak Probe Focuses on Confidentiality Pledges," Reuters, January 2, 2004.
- Derek Seidman, "CounterPunch," Weekend Edition, February 20-22, 2004.
- Michael Massing, "Now They Tell Us," New York Review of Books, February 26, 2004.
- James C. Moore, "Not fit to print: How Ahmed Chalabi and the Iraq war lobby used New York Times reporter Judith Miller to make the case for invasion", Slate, May 27, 2004. (Sub required).
- "Everything you need to know about Judith Miller, including nasty gossip," Seeing the Forest, May 31, 2004.
- Franklin Foer, "The Source of the Trouble," New York Magazine, June 7, 2004.
- "More Trouble for Judith Miller and 'New York Times': Subpoena in Plame/Novak Probe", Editor and Publisher, August 12, 2004.
- "Judge orders reporter jailed over sources", Associated Press, October 7, 2004.
- Terry Frieden, "New York Times reporter held in contempt", CNN, October 7, 2004.
- "Judge Orders Judith Miller Jailed, Sulzberger Promises 'Fight'", Editor & Publisher, October 7, 2004.
- "NYT reporter Judith Miller thinks her 'job' is to defy the law," BeldarBlog, October 7, 2004.
- Carol D. Leonnig, "Journalist Cited for Contempt in Leak Probe. Reporter Refused To Discuss Sources," Washington Post, October 8, 2004.
- Jack Shafer, "God Bless Judith Miller. Two cheers for our courageous First Amendment martyr," Slate, October 8, 2004.
- Richard B. Schmitt, "A Sign of Hope for Reporters in CIA Leak Case. One judge questions whether the government has unchecked power to make journalists reveal their sources in issues before grand juries," Los Angeles Times, December 9, 2004.
2005
- Jack Shafer, "Together, Again: Judith Miller and Ahmad Chalabi", Slate, January 31, 2005.
- Jack Shafer, "Miller Time (Again): The New York Times owes readers an explanation for Judith Miller's faulty WMD reporting", Slate, February 12, 2005.
- "Excerpts from the Court of Appeals Decisions on Miller and Cooper," Editor & Publisher, February 15, 2005.
- Adam Liptak, "Appeals Court Says Reporters Must Testify or Go to Jail," New York Times, February 15, 2005.
- Jack Shafer, "Memo to Cooper and Miller. Fire Floyd Abrams. Hire Bruce Sanford," Slate, February 15, 2005. Read U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruling, February 15, 2005.
- Carol D. Leonnig, "Reporters must testify, court rules. Says journalists in CIA case can be jailed for refusing," Washington Post, February 16, 2005.
- Bob Engber, "What About Bob? Judith Miller and Matt Cooper seem to be headed for jail. Why isn't Robert Novak?" Slate, February 17, 2005.
- Barbara W. Wall, "Reporters in Plame Leak Investigation Ordered to Testify or Face Jail," Gannett, February 18, 2005.
- Joe Strupp, "Abrams Files Appeal for Cooper and Miller in Plame Case," Editor & Publisher, March 21, 2005.
- "Plame Case, All Over But the Jailing?" Editor & Publisher, April 6, 2005.
- Carol D. Leonnig, "Papers Say Leak Probe Is Over," Washington Post, April 7, 2005.
- William E. Jackson, Jr., "Plame Game Enters Bottom of 9th Inning ," Editor & Publisher, April 7, 2005.
- Adam Liptak, "C.I.A. Leak Inquiry Is Near End, Prosecutor Says," (abstract) New York Times, April 8, 2005.
- Joe Strupp, "'Matt and Judy Show': Cooper and Miller on the Plame Case," Editor & Publisher, April 12, 2005.
- "Full D.C. Circuit Won't Hear Miller/Cooper Case; Only Step Left is Supreme Court," Editor & Publisher, April 19, 2005.
- Adam Liptak, "Court Declines Case of Reporters in Leak Case," New York Times, April 19, 2005.
- "Loss For CIA-Leak Case Reporters," AP, April 19, 2005.
- Terry Frieden, "Appeals court rejects reporters' appeal. Time, New York Times seek Supreme Court review," CNN, April 20, 2005.
- Joe Strupp, "Finally, Miller and Cooper Turn to the Supreme Court," Editor & Publisher, April 20, 2005.
- William E. Jackson, Jr., "Matt Cooper, Facing Jail, Awaits Appeal to Supreme Court," Editor & Publisher, April 22, 2005.
- John W. Dean, "An Update on the Investigation Into the Leak Of CIA Agent Plame's Identity: Will The Supreme Court Take The Miller And Cooper Cases?" FindLaw's Writ, April 22, 2005.
- Barbara W. Wall, "Plame Investigation Case to Be Appealed to U.S. Supreme Court," Gannett, May 6, 2005.
- "Supreme Court urged to protect reporters from jail time," AP, May 10, 2005.
- Jack Shafer, "What Matt Cooper Shares With Yaser Hamdi. A new petition before the Supreme Court explains all," Slate, May 11, 2005.
- Adam Liptak, "State Attorneys General Ask Supreme Court to Hear 2 Reporters' Case," (abstract) New York Times, May 28, 2005.
- Allan Wolper, "Was It Proper for 'WP' Reporter to Talk to Plame Prosecutor?" Editor & Publisher, May 31, 2005: "Walter Pincus, a Washington Post investigative reporter, gave a deposition in the Valerie Plame investigation. In a previous 'Ethics Corner' column, Miami Herald reporter David Kidwell criticized him for doing so. Here, Pincus responds."
- Joe Strupp, "Supreme Court To Decide This Week On Hearing Plame Case," Editor & Publisher, June 20, 2005.
- Russ Baker, "The Sins of Judith Miller: The New York Times reporter who helped spread the fallacy that Saddam Hussein had WMD has a new beat: discrediting the United Nations.", Alternet, June 24, 2005.
- "Miller/Cooper Case Reaches Supreme Court Thursday; White House Has No Comment," Editor & Publisher, June 22, 2005.
- Jane Roh, "Journalists Hope Court Takes Up Plame Case," Fox News, June 26, 2005.
- Richard B. Schmitt, "High Court Declines to Hear Appeal of Reporters in Plame Case," Los Angeles Times, June 27, 2005: "The Supreme Court today cleared the way for the Justice Department to jail two reporters who refused to reveal confidential sources to a special prosecutor investigating how the name of an undercover CIA operative ended up in a newspaper column. ... The high court declined to hear the appeal of reporters Judith Miller of the New York Times and Matthew Cooper of Time magazine, who had argued that the 1st Amendment protected them from having to identify their sources to prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald in the politically charged case."
- Gina Holland, "Supreme Court Won't Hear CIA Leak Case," AP, June 27, 2005.
- Joe Strupp, "Supreme Court Will Not Hear Miller/Cooper Case," Editor & Publisher, June 27, 2005.
- Joe Strupp, "Miller/Cooper Case Returns To Federal Judge," Editor & Publisher, June 27, 2005.
- Joe Strupp, "UPDATE: Judge to Consider Miller/Cooper Case on Wednesday," Editor & Publisher, June 27, 2005.
- "Sulzberger, Miller, and Time Inc. Respond to Supreme Court Setback," Editor & Publisher, June 27, 2005.
- "Joseph Wilson Responds to Decision in Plame Case," Editor & Publisher, June 27, 2005.
- Tom Brune, "Jail looms for two journalists. Supreme Court turns down the appeal of reporters who have refused to name their sources in leak probe," Newsday, June 28, 2005: "After the Supreme Court rejected their appeals Monday, two journalists who refused to reveal their confidential sources in a federal leak probe could face an order to go to jail as soon as this week."
- Glenn Harlan Reynolds, "No 'journalistic privilege'," USA Today, June 28, 2005.
- Op-Ed: "Twilight zone for reporters," USA Today, June 28, 2005.
- Claudia Parsons, "Time Inc says will hand over papers in Plame case," Reuters, June 30, 2005.
- "MSNBC Analyst Says Cooper Documents Reveal Karl Rove as Source in Plame Case," Editor & Publisher, July 1, 2005: "Now that Time Inc. has turned over documents to federal court, presumably revealing who its reporter, Matt Cooper, identified as his source in the Valerie Plame/CIA case, speculation runs rampant on the name of that source, and what might happen to him or her. Tonight, on the syndicated McLaughlin Group political talk show, Lawrence O'Donnell, senior MSNBC political analyst, claimed to know that name--and it is, according to him, top White House mastermind Karl Rove." Article includes transcript of O'Donnell's remarks.
- Pete Yost, "Judge Orders Jail for N.Y. Times Reporter," Associated Press, July 6, 2005.
- Reporters Without Borders, "Prison for Judith Miller : a dark day for freedom of the press," Media Release, July 6, 2005.
- Adam Liptak and Maria Newman, "New York Times Reporter Jailed for Keeping Source Secret," New York Times, July 6, 2005.
- Jonathan Weiler, "Miller's Crossing," The Gadflyer, July 6, 2005.
- Editorial: "Judith Miller Goes to Jail," New York Times, July 7, 2005.
- "Judith Miller In Jail," The Rude Pundit, July 7, 2005. Warning: Includes language which may be offensive.
- Norman Solomon, "Judith Miller: Drum Major for War," AlterNet, July 7, 2005: "In the rush to praise Miller for going to jail, people forget her repeated push for war, and adherence to the government's version of stories."
- Joshua Micah Marshall, "The Miller/Fitzgerald Backstory," TPM Cafe, July 7, 2005.
- Patrick J. Buchanan, "On Jailing Journalists", The American Cause, July 11, 2005: Buchanan reminds everyone that there is no federal law shielding reporters from Frand Jury Testimony.
- Atrios, "Good Question," Eschaton, July 12, 2005: "Maybe someone with a better grasp of Plame minutiae knows the answer, but to me a romenesko letter writer [Therese Eiben] asks a good question: 'Judith Miller never wrote about Valerie Plame, how did it become generally known that Miller had a conversation with a source that (presumably) disclosed the fact that Plame was CIA agent/wife of Joseph Wilson? I can’t find that link in this convoluted chain of events.'"
- Greg Palast, "Mr. Rove and the Access of Evil. Tell us your 'source,' Judy. Not published in The New York Times," gregpalast.com, July 12, 2005: "The only thing more evil, small-minded and treasonous than the Bush Administration's jailing Judith Miller for a crime the Bush Administration committed, is Judith Miller covering up her Bush Administration 'source'."
- William E. Jackson, Jr., "What was Judith Miller Up To?" Editor & Publisher, July 12, 2005: "Was she simply a recipient of the leak of Valerie Plame's identity as a CIA agent--or did she carry that news to others herself? Speculation grows that the special prosecutor is looking at the possibility that unnamed journalists 'started a chain of conversations,' passing information about Plame to administration officials."
- Arianna Huffington, "Judy Miller: Do We Want To Know Everything or Don't We?" The Huffington Post, July 27, 2005.
- Arianna Huffington, "The Judy File," The Huffington Post, July 31, 2005.
- Murray Waas, "The Meeting", The American Prospect Online, August 6, 2005.
- "Exclusive: New Information May Reveal Key Details on Judith Miller's Role in the Rove/CIA Scandal," Democracy Now!, August 5, 2005: "In a rare interview, veteran investigative journalist Murray Waas reveals new information on the federal investigation into the leaking of the identity of undercover CIA operative Valerie Plame and the role of jailed New York Times reporter Judith Miller. We also speak with Plame's husband, Ambassador Joe Wilson about the latest developments in the case." [Includes rush transcript.]
- Robert Scheer, "Embedded over her head in Washington," Los Angeles Times, August 23, 2005.
- Susan Schmidt and Jim VandeHei, "N.Y. Times Reporter Released From Jail. Miller to Testify In CIA Leak Probe," Washington Post, September 29, 2005.
- David Johnston and Douglas Jehl, "Times Reporter Free From Jail; She Will Testify," New York Times, September 30, 2005.
- John Solomon, "Miller Agrees to Testify in CIA Leak Probe," Associated Press (Yahoo! News), September 30, 2005.
- Adam Entous, "Reporter breaks silence in CIA leak case," Reuters (Yahoo! News), September 30, 2005.
- Joe Strupp, "'NY Times' Attorney Says Subpoena Required Miller to Turn Over Notes," Editor & Publisher, September 30, 2005.
- Arianna Huffington, "Who is Judy Miller Kidding?", AlterNet, October 3, 2005. (First published in the Los Angeles Times).
- Richard Ackland, "Truth trapped in the law's cruel machinery", Sydney Morning Herald, October 7, 2005.
- Adam Entous, "Reporter turns over new notes in CIA leak case," Reuters (ABC News), October 7, 2005.
- Adam Entous, "Letter shows Cheney aide was prodded in leak probe," Reuters (Boston Globe), October 8, 2005.
- Richard B. Schmitt, "N.Y. Times Reporter to Again Testify Before Grand Jury in CIA Leak Case. Judith Miller turns over new notes and plans to 'supplement' earlier testimony, her boss says," Los Angeles Times, October 12, 2005.
- David Johnston, "Contempt Finding Is Lifted in Case of Times Reporter," New York Times, October 13, 2005.
- Howard Kurtz, "The Judith Miller Story: Not Ready Yet. N.Y. Times Staffers Voice Dismay at Newspaper's Coverage," Washington Post, October 13, 2005.
- Juan Cole, "Judy Miller and the neocons: Arrogance, poor editing, and getting too close to her sources -- not ideology -- led to her fall", Salon, October 14, 2005.
- Don Van Natta Jr, Adam Liptak and Clifford J. Levy, "The Miller Case: A Notebook, a Cause, a Jail Cell and a Deal", New York Times, October 16, 2005.
- Judith Miller, "My Four Hours Testifying in the Federal Grand Jury Room: A Personal Account", New York Times, October 16, 2005
- "'Hidden Scandal' in Miller Story, Charges Former CBS Newsman", Editor & Publisher, October 16, 2005.
- Howard Kurtz, "Reporter, Times Are Criticized for Missteps: Media Analysts Question Decisions by Miller, Newspaper's Editors Regarding Leak", Washington Post, October 17, 2005.