Difference between revisions of "Unitary Executive Theory"
m (→Bush Documents) |
|||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
"Cheney has tried to increase executive power with a series of bold actions -- some so audacious that even [[conservative]]s on the [[Supreme Court]] sympathetic to Cheney's view have rejected them as overreaching," Milbank wrote. | "Cheney has tried to increase executive power with a series of bold actions -- some so audacious that even [[conservative]]s on the [[Supreme Court]] sympathetic to Cheney's view have rejected them as overreaching," Milbank wrote. | ||
− | + | ==Bush Documents== | |
*[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/11/20021104-3.html News Release: "President Signs Justice Approps Authorization Act,"] Statement by the President, November 4, 2002: "The executive branch shall construe section 530D of title 28, and related provisions in section 202 of the Act, in a manner consistent with the constitutional authorities of the President to supervise the '''unitary executive branch''' and to withhold information the disclosure of which could impair foreign relations, the national security, the deliberative processes of the Executive, or the performance of the Executive's constitutional duties." | *[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/11/20021104-3.html News Release: "President Signs Justice Approps Authorization Act,"] Statement by the President, November 4, 2002: "The executive branch shall construe section 530D of title 28, and related provisions in section 202 of the Act, in a manner consistent with the constitutional authorities of the President to supervise the '''unitary executive branch''' and to withhold information the disclosure of which could impair foreign relations, the national security, the deliberative processes of the Executive, or the performance of the Executive's constitutional duties." | ||
*[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/03/20060309-8.html News Release: "President's Statement on H.R. 199, the 'USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005',"] March 9, 2006: "The executive branch shall construe the provisions of H.R. 3199 that call for furnishing information to entities outside the executive branch, such as sections 106A and 119, in a manner consistent with the President's constitutional authority to supervise the '''unitary executive branch''' and to withhold information the disclosure of which could impair foreign relations, national security, the deliberative processes of the Executive, or the performance of the Executive's constitutional duties." | *[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/03/20060309-8.html News Release: "President's Statement on H.R. 199, the 'USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005',"] March 9, 2006: "The executive branch shall construe the provisions of H.R. 3199 that call for furnishing information to entities outside the executive branch, such as sections 106A and 119, in a manner consistent with the President's constitutional authority to supervise the '''unitary executive branch''' and to withhold information the disclosure of which could impair foreign relations, national security, the deliberative processes of the Executive, or the performance of the Executive's constitutional duties." |
Revision as of 12:28, 3 August 2006
- "The president is always right."—Steven Bradbury, U.S. Department of Justice lawyer, July 11, 2006. [1]
- "It's not too far from King of Everything, really."—Jan Frel, AlterNet, October 28, 2005. [2]
The unitary executive theory "asserts that all executive authority must be in the President’s hands, without exception." [3]
President George W. Bush "has been asserting from the outset of his presidency" that presidential power "must be unilateral, and unchecked," Jennifer Van Bergen wrote January 9, 2006, in FindLaw's Writ.
"But the most recent and blatant presidential intrusions on the law and Constitution supply the verse to that refrain. They not only claim unilateral executive power, but also supply the train of the President's thinking, the texture of his motivations, and the root of his intentions.
"They make clear, for instance, that the phrase 'unitary executive' is a code word for a doctrine that favors nearly unlimited executive power. Bush has used the doctrine in his signing statements to quietly expand presidential authority," Van Bergen wrote.
According to "Dr. Christopher Kelley, a professor in the Department of Political Sciences at Miami University, as of April 2005, President Bush had used the doctrine 95 times when signing legislation into law, issuing an executive order, or responding to a congressional resolution," Van Bergen wrote September 23, 2005.
"The President announced in these signings that he would construe provisions in a manner consistent with his 'constitutional authority to supervise the unitary executive branch.' While the President clearly has the authority to supervise the executive branch, it is unclear how far he might construe this authority under the unitary executive theory," Van Bergen wrote.
Contents
Cheney & Addington
Jan Frel wrote in the October 28, 2005, AlterNet Blog that Bush had, however, used this "unitary logic, including [in] many of his ill-fated choices relating to torture and the Geneva Conventions."
"And who was the author of the infamous 'torture memo?'," Frel asked? It was David S. Addington, chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney since October 2005 and Cheney's counsel since 2001, who "believes in the Unitary Executive theory. If you guessed that this meant the power of one CEO who decides liberty and justice for all, you wouldn't be far off," Frel wrote.
Addington was the "vice president's point man," Washington Post reporter Dana Milbank wrote October 11, 2004.
"Cheney has tried to increase executive power with a series of bold actions -- some so audacious that even conservatives on the Supreme Court sympathetic to Cheney's view have rejected them as overreaching," Milbank wrote.
Bush Documents
- News Release: "President Signs Justice Approps Authorization Act," Statement by the President, November 4, 2002: "The executive branch shall construe section 530D of title 28, and related provisions in section 202 of the Act, in a manner consistent with the constitutional authorities of the President to supervise the unitary executive branch and to withhold information the disclosure of which could impair foreign relations, the national security, the deliberative processes of the Executive, or the performance of the Executive's constitutional duties."
- News Release: "President's Statement on H.R. 199, the 'USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005'," March 9, 2006: "The executive branch shall construe the provisions of H.R. 3199 that call for furnishing information to entities outside the executive branch, such as sections 106A and 119, in a manner consistent with the President's constitutional authority to supervise the unitary executive branch and to withhold information the disclosure of which could impair foreign relations, national security, the deliberative processes of the Executive, or the performance of the Executive's constitutional duties."
Signing Statements
"Presidential Signing Statements: Similar to the line-item veto is the presidential signing statement, in which the President signs a bill but also specifies which parts of a bill he or she actually intends to enforce. [4]
- "Until the Reagan administration, only 75 signing statements had ever been issued."
- Presidents Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton "issued a total of 247 signing statements."
- "President George W. Bush alone has issued 130 signing statements, which tend to be more sweeping in scope than those of his predecessors."
Publications
Arthur M. Schlesinger, "The Imperial Presidency," Houghton Mifflin, 1973 ISBN 0395177138. [5]
Related SourceWatch Resources
- Bush administration: individual rights versus national security
- Bush administration pattern of excess
- Bush doctrine
- Bush regime
- executive privilege
- George W. Bush's domestic spying
- Samuel A. Alito, Jr. (proponent)
- The case for impeachment of President George W. Bush
External Links
Profiles & Reports
- Unitary executive theory in the Wikipedia.
- Evan Caminker, "The Unitary Executive and State Administration of Federal Law," University of Michigan Law School, published in 45 University of Kansas Law Review, 1997.
- Rev. Bill McGinnis, "Unitary Executive Theory. A Recipe For Dictatorship," www.UnitaryExecutive.net/www.ExecutiveTyranny.com, undated: "A deviant theory, inherently anti-American, with no place anywhere in our system of government."
- Christopher S. Yoo, Steven G. Calabresi, and Anthony Colangelo, "The Unitary Executive in the Modern Era, 1945-2001," Vanderbilt University. (143-page pdf). Undated [2002].
- Christopher S. Yoo, Steven G. Calabresi, and Anthony Colangelo,"The Unitary Executive in the Modern Era, 1945-2004," Iowa Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 2, p. 601, 2005.
2004
- Dana Milbank, "In Cheney's Shadow, Counsel Pushes the Conservative Cause," Washington Post, October 11, 2004.
2005
- Jennifer Van Bergen, "Scholar says Bush has used obscure doctrine to extend power 95 times," The Raw Story, September 23, 2005.
- Jan Frel, "Unitary Executive Theory," AlterNet Blogs, October 28, 2005.
2006
- Tom Engelhardt, "Tomgram: A Cult of Presidential Power. The Unrestrained President," TomDispatch.com, January 4, 2006.
- Jeremy Brecher & Brendan Smith, "The Limits of Power: Questions for Alito," The Nation, January 6, 2006.
- Glenn Greenwald, "An ideology of lawlessness," Unclaimed Territory, January 6, 2006.
- Jennifer Van Bergen, "The Unitary Executive: Is The Doctrine Behind the Bush Presidency Consistent with a Democratic State?" FindLaw's Writ, January 9, 2006.
- Armando, "What A 'Unitary Executive' Means - President As King," Daily Kos, January 10, 2006.
- Jennifer Van Bergen, "The Unitary Executive. Why the Bush Doctrine Violates the Constitution," CounterPunch, January 12, 2006.
- Sidney Blumenthal, "George Bush's rough justice. The career of the latest supreme court nominee has been marked by his hatred of liberalism," Guardian Unlimited (UK), January 12, 2006.
- Robert Parry, "Alito & the Ken Lay Factor," consortiumnews.com, January 12, 2006.
- Chrish, "Bin Laden tape justifies Unitary Executive on the Big Story," News Hounds, January 20, 2006.
- Robert Parry, "The End of 'Unalienable Rights'," consortiumnews.com, January 24, 2006.
- Steven C. Clemons, "Democratic Imperative: Bush's 'Unitary Executive' Notion Must be Obliterated," The Washington Note, February 26, 2006.
- Paul Waldman, "'Unitary Executive' Or Autocracy?" TomPaine.com, March 8, 2006.
- "The Unitary Executive, Part I: Signing Statements," The Mahablog, March 25, 2006.
- "The Unitary Executive, Part II: What is it and why is it bad?", The Mahablog, March 27, 2006.
- James Bovard, "Bush’s Bogus Theory of Absolute Power," LewRockwell.com, April 8, 2006.
- Chris Floyd, "Insanity Defense: Power, Paranoia and Presidential Tyranny," Empire Burlesque, June 29, 2006.
- Tom Raum, "Analysis: Wartime Powers Face Scrutiny. Analysis: Guantanamo ruling raises questions on other Bush assertions of wartime powers," Associated Press (CBS News), June 30, 2006.
- Richard Stengel, "No One Gets a Blank Check," TIME.com, July 2, 2006.
- Michael Ratner, "For His Eyes Only: Bush's Secret Crimes," The Nation, July 2, 2006.
- Dana Milbank, "It's Bush's Way or the Highway on Guantanamo Bay," Washington Post, July 12, 2006.
- Doug Smith, "The Unitary Executive for Dummies," DouglasKSmith.com, July 13, 2006.
- Michael Isikoff and Stuart Taylor Jr., "The Gitmo Fallout. The fight over the Hamdan ruling heats up—as fears about its reach escalate," Newsweek, July 17, 2006 (issue).
- Chris Floyd, "CYA Agents: Bush Hit Men Running Scared," Empire Burlesque, August 1, 2006.
- Dan Froomkin, "Signing Statements Strike a Nerve," Washington Post, August 2, 2006.
- Commentary: "Bush is signing away our checks and balances," Chicago Sun-Times, August 2, 2006.
- Aziz Huq, "We're All Enemy Combatants Now," TomPaine.com, August 2, 2006.