User talk:Sdickert

From SourceWatch
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi Sanford, welcome to Sourcewatch - if you have any queries feel free to drop me or Conor Kenny a line.

Can I draw your attention to one aspect of our policy (see http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=SourceWatch:Policy for the full page)

Groups/individuals posting articles on themselves

We don't encourage individuals and groups to create SW articles about themselves or people or organizations with which they are affiliated, and we encourage people to register under their own names when editing articles already on SW about themselves or their groups. We also encourage people who edit articles about themselves or people or organizations with which they are affiliated to exercise restraint and to defer to other contributors with regard to editing choices that are matters of interpretation rather than fact. When disputes arise over interpretation, such individuals should try to address them with comments on the talk page rather than the article space itself. Users who are overly aggressive in deleting relevant facts from articles about themselves or others may be blocked from contributing to or editing the site.

Cheers, --Bob Burton 19:08, 16 Sep 2006 (EDT)

Bob, thanks for the help - I appreciate the feedback. I understand the rules and was trying to find an appropriate, factual basis to end the Deutsch sentence so that it made sense in the same fashion as the Kerry one did. I also included my newest blog - PoliticalWarez - in order to expand my explanation.

If you have any further suggestions - please help.

Thanks. --Sanford Dickert 04:56, 12 Dec 2006 (EDT)

Hi Sandford, I have gone through the profile and added a few links and changed the lead so that it indicates your current primary positions. One point I would like to check is the statement:

"He is now working with other Democratic campaigns in Florida and New York state."

I assume this is now dated. It would be best to add in he details of which campaigns it referred to change to the past tense, if my assumption that these campaigns are now over is right. I'm happy for you to make the change directly to the article page. --Bob Burton 18:35, 12 December 2006 (EST)