User talk:WomenAfrica
Hello,
Welcome to SourceWatch.
I just restored referenced info that you had removed from the article UN Watch without explanation. Any removal of information must be explaned with a post to the corresponding talk page - is the info wrong? out of date? Otherwise the deletions will be reverted. Please see SourceWatch:Contributing and related Help pages for more on SourceWatch policies.
Also, while I left all of the new material that you added to the UN Watch article, it is not referenced. Please add references (links to online material or descriptions of offline material) as soon as possible.
Best, Diane Farsetta 11:44, 16 February 2007 (EST)
Dear Ven,
The problem is that, once again, you have deleted entire sections of the UN Watch article (specifically, most of the "Targets of UN Watch" section) without any explanation. Therefore, I have again restored the material that you deleted.
Please abide by SourceWatch policies and either explain in detail why you are deleting referenced information, or refrain from doing so. Otherwise you will be judged a disruptive user and banned from the site.
Best, Diane Farsetta 10:15, 19 February 2007 (EST)
Contributing
Dear WomenAfrica, while we are happy for anyone to edit SourceWatch this is on the basis of abiding by our not very onerous policies and protocols. The most basic of these is explaining any substantive changes in a note posted to the talk page (acessed my clicking on the discussion tab). If you are uncertain of our policies or how to resolve an issue then feel free to drop me a line and I'll respond as promptly as possible. However, repeated deletion of material without explanation will lead to myself or one of the other sysops blocking you from making any further changes. The choice is yours. --Bob Burton 23:43, 20 February 2007 (EST)
