User talk:Schmil

Hi Schmil,

You made this change to the title of the section in the MJ Gohel article about the 2001 Agra summit. You explained it thus: "2001 Agra heading based on opinion not fact, its selective & misleading as both sides criticized in full article, needs slight correction and tight editing".

I'm fairly relaxed about the change itself, but I have to challenge your claim that my original section title was "misleading as both sides criticized in full article". The only criticisms the article made about the Indian side were that Vajpayee was being too soft on Islamabad, and allowing Musharraf to score a propaganda coup in return for nothing! So whilst both sides are criticized in the article, Gohel's tone is very definitely pro-Indian.

Can you point to a single criticism of Delhi in the article which is not in the "too soft on Musharraf" category? --Neoconned 11:35, 19 Aug 2005 (EDT)

Well, either you can't, or you simply can't be bothered. So either way, I feel justified in reverting that section title to the previous version. --Neoconned 13:09, 7 Sep 2005 (EDT)