User talk:Julianmorris

Dear Professor Morris,

Welcome to SourceWatch. If you could make your objections to the article's content on the discussion page (Talk:International Policy Network), we can then work together with Greenworks to move the article to a version that is both fair and accurate.

You said in this posting that "We have been blocked from altering the IPN entry on their supposedly open site". That's a somewhat misleading statement. Looking at the history, a number of anonymous and unexplained edits were made to the article from a variety of IP addresses. I imagine these are the attempts to alter the article that you're referring to. Of course, these looked like vandalism and were reverted. Today is the first time that edits have been made openly on behalf of the IPN.

Identifying yourself as you have done is the correct course, and making your objections to the article's content explicit will mean that any factual inaccuracies in the article can be fixed. However, today you have made edits consisting of blanket deletions, with misleading justifications. For example, you said that you "corrected staff listings, partner listing" when in fact you were deleting most of the article's content. --Neoconned 08:55, 11 Jun 2006 (EDT)