User talk:CAquirre

From SourceWatch
Jump to navigation Jump to search

you are deleting perfectly legitimate websites. Maybe you would care to state why you are deleting so many entries.

Your edits may be rolled back otherwise.

--Antidotto 07:55, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

  • 23:02, 20 April 2012 (hist) (diff) List of citizen journalism websites ‎ (SW: rm, there's no news on this website at all)
  • 23:01, 20 April 2012 (hist) (diff) List of citizen journalism websites ‎ (SW: - →Worldwide: rm personal blogs that simply express personal views + remove outdated ones (haven't updated at all in 2012) + remove down/no content ones)
  • 22:57, 20 April 2012 (hist) (diff) List of local news sites ‎ (SW: website down for a while, removing) (top)
  • 22:56, 20 April 2012 (hist) (diff) List of citizen journalism websites ‎ (SW: - →Unsorted (Please sort!): remove more expired domains and ones that aren't citizen journalism)
  • 22:51, 20 April 2012 (hist) (diff) List of citizen journalism websites ‎ (SW: remove dead websites, spam websites, general cleanup)

My reasons are quite clear CAquirre 04:53, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

--Antidotto 22:41, 25 April 2012 (UTC)== but see this ==

You deleted all of these:

This is not an exhaustive list of live websites, and some perfectly legitimate, that you have axed. Thus you didn't even look at the websites and simply axed them.

How about if you add back the axed websites that you have incorrectly axed?

Kind rgds --Antidotto 08:19, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


Some of them were just moved around, and the ones removed like "snypher.com" were not citizen journalism websites. Snypher.com is a website that sells videos. thisisdiversity.com is a personal blog. fizwoz.com is also a website that just sells images. Those aren't citizen journalism websites. CAquirre 22:11, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

hmmm...

Snypher.com = a website that enables anyone to post their videos or other AV materials. Some of it silly, but some of it unusually interesting. Financial aspect is minimal. that registers as citizen journalism/voyeurism. So, I am actually surprised that you axed it.

Maybe you will be a bit more careful with further deletions ... and restore legit stuff. Or, in the very least, justify your reasons for deleting material -- something you really havent done.

--Antidotto 22:41, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=User_talk:CAquirre&oldid=568413"