I relocated the following par. It seems to me that Tiger's personal opinion re scepticism of UFOs is not unreasonable and I'm not persuaded that just because someone who does argue the case for UFO's lables him a "dinosaur" that it warrants reproduction here. Plus the context of Waddel's comment is somewhat more qualified than this par suggests. Plus his views on UFO's (and others assessments of those views) seems rather peripheral to his main work. So I think its better to leave this section out.--Bob Burton 22:08, 1 Apr 2005 (EST)
He was described as a "dinosaur" by John Waddell, of the Mutual UFO Network of Ohio for comments he made on an ABC Nightline discussion about UFOs (he dared to say that only fringe groups take UFOs seriously).