Talk:Pharies 'Bud' B. Petty

From SourceWatch
Jump to navigation Jump to search

It is an absolute disgrace and scandal that wikipedia would allow an article like this. I cannot believe that this type of research has been permitted. The high levels of insanity on this page are amazing. This company has absolutely nothing to do with any of the heinous allegations that have been rendered. This page is badly resourced. I demand that this page is taken down at once or you all could find that you will be faced with a libel suit. I don’t know who has written this shoddy page but it needs to be stopped. It appears that the individual (s) involved are scrapping the barrel and finding out nothing. It is beyond my comprehension that this has been allowed to stand. All the connecting links are also poorly researched. Please put an end to this tripe and stop adding utter garbage which it seems has been going on for a while.

Dear Rcooley,
To assist SourceWatch contributors to better understand your concerns it would be appreciated if you could:
1) clarify what connection you have or had, if any, with Petty and/or Tepper Aviation. The reason I ask is that you wrote that you "demand that this page is taken down at once or you all could find that you will be faced with a libel suit" but it is not clear who you are; and
2) identify specific examples of what you believe to be inaccuracies on the article page. You wrote that "the high levels of insanity on this page are amazing" but it is not clear what you are referring to exactly.
I would also suggest you read the help page on our complaints procedure - it's at http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=SourceWatch:How_Fix_An_Error
I look forward to your response. --Bob Burton 23:55, 19 May 2006 (EDT)
Re "It is an absolute disgrace and scandal that wikipedia ..."
Apparently Rcooley has lost his way .. this is NOT the wikipedia ... we do things differently here in SourceWatch. Artificial Intelligence 05:25, 20 May 2006 (EDT)
Dear Rcooley, I haven't really got anything to add to what Bob and AI have said. I stand by the articles. In fact there is a great deal out in the blogosphere that I have deliberately not referenced in the articles, precisely because I wanted to stick to using reputable, mainstream media sources, in addition to company registration records, and published books. Please make your criticisms more specific, pointing out which sources you believe are not reliable, and then they can be dealt with. --Neoconned 13:54, 20 May 2006 (EDT)


The crazed level of hysteria on this website is incredible. It’s amusing if not amazingly pathetic. The people working on these pages all seem to have concealed their true identities. Who is this Neoconned? What gives this individual the right to hold forth on all these baseless allegations. The name obviously suggests his/her motives. I repeat that all these comments are libellous and none of these supposed sources and links prove anything and in fact they do not even work. The allegations are totally and unequivocally groundless. I strongly urge you all to not only stop adding to these pages but delete them from your folders. What has this got to do with fake news? It certainly is fake that there are people using codenames. They should reveal their true identity. What do they have to hide? Terminate Tepper and related pages at once or action will be pursued.

I repeat once again that none of the links go to the allegations made. It shocks me that after I demanded that no changes were made, further unsubstantiated claims were added. I would like to know who this Neoconned is? What is this person hiding? I repeat once more than none of the links work or lead to the material that has been alleged. Kindly remove them at once.

The links worked just now when I tried them. The only links that don't take you directly to the supporting articles in question are the two news stories archived by the LexisNexis news database, which is a for-pay service which expects you to pay if you want to read the full story. I have a LexisNexis subscription and reviewed the stories, and this article is quoting them accurately. As for the question of who Neoconned is, perhaps Rcooley should tell us who he is. --Sheldon Rampton 19:51, 21 May 2006 (EDT)

I’m actually not hiding behind any pseudonym. This is my name. I’m curious about this individual Neoconned because I suspect he used to work in our office. I tried to avoid mentioning his history before but the person we know was fired for having pornographic images of children. The individual would use the name Neoconned on chatrooms and other web forums. He was from the UK but had resided across the Atlantic for some time. I strongly suspect it is this individual. So therefore it would be good if he could be transparent and reveal himself and all his motivations will become apparent in relation to these pages. I don’t think he needs you all to speak for himself. In any case he was naïve enough to leave his details on one site. I would like to also kindly request one last time that you remove all these slanderous allegations based on warped conspiracies. It seems every time I ask you all choose to add more material. That is not very mature. User:Rcooley

Please see my talk page for a reply to this feeble smear. --Neoconned 22:30, 22 May 2006 (EDT)
Neo, I think if I remember correctly that is how you used to like to be called. I’m appealing for you to stop your agenda of revenge. I think if you can be honest with us for just one minute, you know you were the one who had child pornography photos on your computer. I thought we resolved that. I can still help you overcome this problem but this is not the way forward.
Don’t talk to me about democracy or about feeble smears. We have been fighting to ensure democracy remains part of our constitution before you and the rest of the X-Files crew turned up. You can add as many new links and pages as you want for Tepper but you won’t prove a thing nor will you find anything of substance because it does not exist. We’ll be in touch with you soon. Before I forget, how is the cat? User:Rcooley
Again, replied to on my talk page. --Neoconned 23:18, 23 May 2006 (EDT)

Link

Retrieved from "https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Talk:Pharies_%27Bud%27_B._Petty&oldid=151887"