8,835
edits
Changes
m
Parker's statement appears at odds with comments made a few months earlier by an NIA spokeswoman. [[Chris Grimshaw]] of [[Corporate Watch]] reported that:
:They [the NIA] denied conducting any proactive media relations work at all. They claim that their PR strategy is purely reactive, simply handling inquiries from journalists. Spokeswoman [[Ruth Stanway ]] insisted that there is “no dark machiavellian conspiracy” pushing for new nuclear power stations. She attributed the high media profile of the issue to rising oil prices, Russia's signing of the Kyoto Protocol and Lovelock's public utterances. [http://archive.corporatewatch.org/newsletter/issue21/issue21_part2.htm]
==Staff==