65,398
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
no edit summary
==Current Status==
'''Criticism'''
*John Aravosis wrote in the February 23, 2005, ''AMERICAblog'' Blogspot that [http://americablog.blogspot.com/2005/02/worldnetdaily-savages-gannonguckert.html "WorldNetDaily savages GannonGuckert."]
:"One of the best, BEST, stories ever about GannonGuckertGate and what it means, and why it matters, comes from one of the most - MOST - conservative pro-Bush news sources on the Internet. This guy spells out exactly why this is a story. Exactly why this is so outrageous. And note, his column doesn't even criticize us, the liberal bloggers. It is pure and simple an article about how outrageous Gannon's and Talon's AND THE WHITE HOUSE'S actions were in this entire affair."
:*Joseph Farah, [http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42974 "No substitute for real journalism,"] [[WorldNetDaily]]:
::"Who knows why this symbiotic relationship succeeded for as long as it did? Perhaps Gannon-Guckert knew something about people in the [[Bush administration]]. Or, perhaps some inside the Bush administration knew the truth about Gannon-Guckert. We may never know the full truth.
::"But the whole sordid affair illustrates just why a truly free and independent press is so vital to watchdogging government."
'''Call for Investigation'''
