Open main menu

Changes

U.S. Chamber of Commerce

274 bytes added, 17:38, 24 May 2013
fixing refs
In September, 2010, two national watchdog groups, [[U.S. Chamber Watch]] and [http://www.velvetrevolution.us/stop_chamber/ StopTheChamber.com], filed complaints with the U.S. [[Internal Revenue Service]] asking the agency to investigate the [[U.S. Chamber of Commerce]] for criminal fraud and money laundering. The groups allege that the Chamber illegally funneled donations from a wealthy charitable foundation into its political battles. Chamber Watch said that $12 million of an $18 million donation that the wealthy [[Starr Foundation]] [http://www.velvetrevolution.us/stop_chamber/images/irs_complaint_9_10_10.pdf gave] (pdf) gave to the National Chamber Foundation was in the form of loans that have never been repaid. Chamber Watch says the money was diverted to finance political causes, including [[tort reform]], to shield companies like [[AIG]] from liability lawsuits. The [[Starr Foundation]] was founded by [[Cornelius Vander Starr]], the insurance entrepreneur who also founded [[AIG]]. The Foundation's Chairman of the Board of Directors is [[Maurice R. Greenberg]], former President and CEO of AIG. The Foundation's Director (and Treasurer) is Howard I. Smith, AIG's former Chief Financial Officer. StopTheChamber.com says it was contacted by a Chamber whistleblower [http://www.velvetrevolution.us/stop_chamber/images/COC_DOJ_Letter8410.pdf who described] (pdf) how Chamber CEO [[Tom Donohue]] is "scamming [business] clients to serve his own interests rather than the interests of the business community." The insider compared Donohue to [[Jack Abramoff]] and [[Bernie Madoff]]. He also alleged that Donohue does not fear the [[Federal Elections Commission]] or Congress, and has a plan set up to attack the [[U.S. Department of Justice]] if the agency ever tries to investigate him.<ref>National Desk, [http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/185296 Watchdog Groups Request Criminal Fraud and Money Laundering Investigations against The U.S. Chamber], ''American Chronicle'', September 15, 2010.</ref>
The September charge echoed similar charges made earlier in the year, in January, 2010, that six of the largest health insurance companies in the U.S. had been secretly funneling millions of dollars to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to oppose health reform. The total amount in this instance was estimated at between $10 million and $20 million. According to a report in the ''National Journal'' online, the money was used "to help underwrite tens of millions of dollars of television ads by two business coalitions set up and subsidized by the chamber."<ref>Staff reports, [http://web.archive.org/web/20101007040736/http://www.appomattoxnews.com/2010/u-s-chamber-of-commerce-charged-with-money-laundering-tactics.html U.S. Chamber of Commerce Charged with Money Laundering Tactics], Appomattox News - Accessed via Wayback Machine, January 15, 2010.</ref><ref>Peter H. Stone [http://web.archive.org/web/20100113034144/http://undertheinfluence.nationaljournal.com/2010/01/health-insurers-funded-chamber.php Health Insurers Funded Chamber Attack Ads], NationalJournal.com - accessed via Wayback Machine, January 12, 2010.</ref>
===2006 Public Citizen Complaint===
===Climate Change Legislation===
In 2009, the Chamber of Commerce lobbied against climate change legislation introduced by Congress. In describing its strategy, the Chamber says it will "resist ill-conceived legislation that is economically disruptive of business and industry activities, that creates regulatory and legislative obstacles to development and deployment of affordable, innovative energy technologies, and that could severely damage the security and economy of the United States."<ref>U.S. Chamber of Commerce[http://www.uschamber.com/issues/index/environment/climatechange.htm "Climate Change],"] U.S. Chamber of Commerceorganizational website, accessed October 2009May 24 2013.</ref> The chamber said it supports "mainstream, common sense views" on climate change, but that it opposes the [[Waxman-Markey Climate Bill]] passed by the House of Representatives on June 26, 2009.<ref name="sciam">Deborah Zabarenko, [http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=rift-at-us-chamber-of-com "Rift at U.S. Chamber of Commerce over climate change],"] ''Scientific American,'' September 30, 2009.</ref>
The group's opposition to the legislation has caused a rift among its corporate members. A number of companies have announced they are leaving the organization as a result of its stance on climate change regulations. Energy companies [[Exelon]], [[PG&E]], and [[PNM Resources]] all announced in September 2009 that they were quitting the Chamber. <ref>Keith Johnson, [http://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2009/09/28/out-the-door-exelon-leaves-chamber-of-commerce-over-climate-policy/ "Out the Door: Exelon Leaves Chamber of Commerce over Climate Policy,"]] , ''Wall Street Journal,'' September 28, 2009.</ref> [[Apple Inc]] also resigned from the Chamber, saying in a statement, "We would prefer that the chamber take a more progressive stance on this critical issue and play a constructive role in addressing the climate crisis"<ref>Jenna Staul, [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/05/apple-quits-chamber-of-co_n_310301.html?show_comment_id=32293735 "Apple Quits Chamber Of Commerce Over Climate Change],"] Huffington Post, October 5, 2009.</ref> Sportswear company [[Nike]] also criticized the Chamber's challenge of the U.S. EPA's authority to regulate carbon dioxide emissions as air pollution.<ref name="sciam"/> Nike said it would resign from the Chambers's board of directors, but that it would retain its membership to the organization in order to work for climate change legislation from inside the organization.<ref>Jenna Staul, [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/30/nike-quits-chamber-of-com_n_304591.html "Nike Quits Chamber Of Commerce Board Of Directors],"] Huffington Post, September 30, 2009.</ref>
{{#evp:youtube|vYGcIhNGSIY|The Yes Men's fake press conference|left|300}}
====Citizen action against the Chamber of Commerce's stance on climate change====
=====Yes Men stage fake Chamber of Commerce press conference=====
On October 19, 2009, anti-corporate performance artists the Yes Men issued a fake press release on behalf of the Chamber of Commerce, claiming that the Chamber had reversed its position on climate change would no longer lobby against the legislation. The activists managed to secure a room at the National Press Club to stage a press conference announcing the policy shift to reporters. The real Chamber of Commerce spokesperson Eric Wohlschlegel interrupted the event and declared the event a fraud. Afterwards, the Chamber threatened to push for a criminal investigation over the prank.<ref>Sam Stein, [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/19/chamber-of-commerce-hoax_n_326069.html "Yes Men Pull Off Chamber Of Commerce Hoax On Climate Change],"] Huffington Post, October 19, 2009.</ref>
=====Grassroots campaigns against the Chamber=====
'''CREDO Action''', part of the Working Assets company, launched a campaign against the Chamber's stance on climate change legislation. The group is organizing an effort to urge members of the lobbying group to resign, calling on them to "denounce the Chamber's extremist position on global warming and revoke your membership effective immediately."<ref>CREDO Action, [http://web.archive.org/web/20091011154305/http://act.credoaction.com/campaign/chamber_of_commerce/ "? Quit the Chamber. Join the Planet."], CREDO Actionorganizational website - accessed by Wayback Machine, accessed October 2009.</ref>
'''Velvet Revolution''' has also organized a campaign against the Chamber of Commerce, citing its stance on climate change among other reasons to call for a reform of the corporate lobbying group.<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20091015095926/http://www.velvetrevolution.us/stop_chamber/ StopTheChamber.com], organizational website - accessed by Wayback Machine,] accessed October 2009.</ref>
===Employee Free Choice Act===
===Opposition to Paid Sick Leave===
In Wisconsin, a local representative of the US Chamber of Commerce called the [[Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce]] lobbied together with the [[Wisconsin Restaurant Association]] for the adoption of Senate Bill 23, which overturned a local ordinance requiring paid sick leave for workers. The law "specified that paid sick leave could be used if a worker is ill, needs to care for a sick child, or obtain counseling if raped or battered, for example. The law also barred companies from penalizing workers for exercising their rights and from erecting unreasonable barriers to impede the fair use of sick leave." <ref> Rebekah Wilce, [http://www.prwatch.org/news/2011/10/11079/flu-burger-alec-wants-sick-people-serving-you-food Flu with that Burger? Alec Wants Sick People Serving You Food] , PR Watch, October 19, 2011, accessed October 21, 2011 .</ref>
==National Chamber Foundation==
The Chamber has taken a lead role in the [[tort reform]] movement. It sponsors the [[Institute for Legal Reform]] (ILR), a [[501(c)6]] organization, and [[Legal Reform Now]], a coalition of business associations, [[think tanks]], and legal reform groups. Website: http://www.instituteforlegalreform.com/
On its website, the ILR posted a "State Liability Systems Ranking" which it calls "Lawsuit Climate 2007".<ref>InstituteforLegalReform, [http://www.instituteforlegalreform.com/lawsuitclimate2007/index.cfm "Lawsuit Climate 2007: Rating the States],"] InstituteforLegalReformorganizational website, accessed October 22, 2007.</ref>
===Opposing "activist judges"===
In late May 2005, the Chamber's Institute for Legal Reform President [[Lisa Rickard]] announced it was going to "reign in activist attorneys general."<ref>USNewswire, [http://web.archive.org/web/20060718120423/http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=48082 News Release: "U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform: Rein in Activist State Attorneys General; Curb 'Regulation through Litigation' and Contingency Fee Deals],"] USNewswirepress release, May 26, 2005.</ref> At a Chamber-sponsored conference examining the "appropriate role" of a state attorney general, several speakers "complained that 'Spitzerism' has become a dangerous model for ambitious regulators," refering to New York AG [[Eliot Spitzer]].<ref>Barrie McKenna, [http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20050527/IBACTIVIST27/TPBusiness/International "Corporate America declares war on 'Spitzerism'],"] ''The Globe and Mail'' (Toronto, Canada), May 27, 2005.</ref>
====''Madison County Record'' (Illinois)====
The ''[[Madison County Record]]'', "an Illinois weekly newspaper launched in September [2004] that bills itself as the county's legal journal, reports on one subject: the state courts in southern Illinois," Jeffrey H. Birnbaum reported in the ''Washington Post''.<ref name="suit">Jeffrey H. Birnbaum, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A38184-2004Dec5.html "Advocacy Groups Blur Media Lines. Some Push Agendas By Producing Movies, Owning Newspapers],"] ''Washington Post'', December 6, 2004.</ref>
Birnbuam pointed to a "recent front page[that] carried an assortment of stories about lawsuits against businesses. In one, a woman sought $15,000 in damages for breaking her nose at a haunted house. In another, a woman sued a restaurant for $50,000 after she hurt her teeth on a chicken breast. ... Nowhere was it reported that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce created the ''Record'' as a weapon in its multimillion-dollar campaign against lawyers who file those kinds of suits," Birnbaum wrote.<ref name="suit"/>
===Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act===
In October 2007, the Chamber filed a friend-of-the court filing in a class action lawsuit under consideration by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] which originated with a California RICO lawsuit involving [[Microsoft]] and [[Best Buy]]. The Chamber stated that "RICO is getting out of control as a device against business. It has been used in more than 4,500 cases since 2001, with only 35 of those cases filed by the government."<ref>Scott Bekker, [http://rcpmag.com/blogs/weblog.aspx?blog=1406 "Microsofted Up. Mafia law pops up in legal dispute over Microsoft-Best Buy arrangement],"] ''Redmond Channel Partner Online'', October 16, 2007.</ref> The Supreme Court overturned the appeal and ruled that Microsoft and Best Buy are subject to RICO laws.<ref>eFluxMedia.com, [http://web.archive.org/web/20080423161844/http://www.efluxmedia.com/news_Supreme_Court_Microsoft_Best_Buy_Subject_to_Racketeering_Laws_09682.html "Supreme Court: Microsoft, Best Buy Subject to Racketeering Laws],"] eFluxMedia.comorganizational report - accessed via the wayback machine, October 16, 2007.</ref>
==Trade==
===TradeRoots===
The Chamber's TradeRoots website is billed as "the nation's leading sustained grassroots education program dedicated to raising public awareness of international trade on a local level."<ref>TradeRoots.org, [http://www.traderoots.org TradeRoots.orgHome], organizational website, accessed May 24, 2013.]</ref>
The ''Trade Toolbox'', a "resource to help in the trade export process, ... includes trade statistics, country and market reports, best market reports, frequently asked questions and trade contacts." The ''Toolbox'' was funded by a grant from the [[U.S. Department of Commerce]].<ref>TradeRoots.org, [http://web.archive.org/web/20050204205059/http://www.traderoots.org/fsMain.asp?i=tt Trade toolbox], organizational website - accessed via Wayback Machine, archived July 3,] TradeRoots.org2013.</ref>
Website: http://www.traderoots.org/<br>
==Coal and Energy==
===Chamber distributes books on energy to children===
In 2010, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce joined with [[Scholastic]] Books to distribute roughly 100,000 books about the potential perils of government fossil fuel regulation to classrooms across the country, as part of its “Shedding Light on Energy" campaign. The book asks, “What do you think could happen if one of our energy sources was suddenly unavailable (e.g., power plant maintenance, government curb on production, etc.)?” Chamber officials maintain that there is no “hidden agenda” behind the question or the educational outreach effort in general, although the book is notably being distributed at a time when the [[Environmental Protection Agency]] is set to regulate [[greenhouse gas]] emissions.<ref name=jv>Josh Voorhees, [http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1010/43844.html#ixzz14oxFHwth "Chamber: Worry about energy regulations, kids"] Politico, Oct. 19, 2010.</ref>
The energy industry has a long history of working to get its perspective into classrooms. In the 1970s, for example, [[nuclear power]] officials distributed comic books in schools as it dealt with the [[PR]] fallout from the near meltdown at [[Three Mile Island]]. And [[BP]] helped develop environmental lesson plans in California, the Sacramento Bee reported last month. The posters and worksheets that the Chamber will be sending out to schools aross the country is based on statistics from the U.S. [[Energy Information Administration]], and the assignments are mostly aimed at teaching students how to use charts and graphs to convey where U.S. energy comes from and how it is used.<ref name=jv/>
===Chamber's Institute for Energy===
In March 2007, ''O'Dwyer's PR Daily'' reported that General [[James L. Jones]], formerly the Supreme Allied Commander of [[NATO]] forces in Europe, had joined the U.S. Chamber of Commerce as a lobbyist.<ref name="Jones">O'Dwyer's PR Daily, [http://www.odwyerpr.com/members/0305jones_uscoc.htm "Jones Works Energy Front],"] ''O'Dwyer's PR Daily'' organizational website (sub req'd), March 5, 2007.</ref>
"Jones will head the [[Institute for Energy]], which is to present itself as a [[Astroturf|grassroots]] organization. The Chamber went a similar path with the creation of the Institute for Legal Reform." Jones will focus on [[global warming]] and seek "to 'unify energy stakeholders behind a common strategy' to produce affordable and secure supplies while protecting the environment," reported ''O'Dwyer's'', quoting Chamber president Tom Donohue.<ref name="Jones"/>
===National gas tax===
"After a Minneapolis bridge collapsed on Aug. 1, [2007,] killing 13 people, members of Congress have sought to increase the gas tax to fix 'structurally deficient' bridges and make other infrastructure repairs. ... The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the [[National Association of Manufacturers]], groups that don’t normally agree with tax increases, support a national gas tax increase to pay for infrastructure improvements."<ref>Jim Snyder, [http://thehill.com/the-executive/...we-are-absolutely-failing-...-in-how-the-system-is-performing-2007-10-19.html "‘...We are absolutely failing ... in how the system is performing’],"] ''The Hill'', October 19, 2007.</ref>
==Other issues==
The Campaign said that "a government-run plan that would have broad and unrivaled power to negotiate for low-cost services of doctors and other health care providers could put private insurers out of business."
The group's former website had a "Take Action" page that says "We can’t afford to let a government-run plan raise our taxes and create long waits for treatment." It urges people to write their Congress members to oppose "government-run health care."<ref>Campaign for Responsible Health Reform , [http://www.responsiblehealthreform.org/take-action Take Action], organizational website, accessed August 18, 2009.</ref>
===SCHIP veto===
The Chamber is among a number of organizations which supported President [[George W. Bush]]'s October 2007 veto of the SCHIP ([[State Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007]]) bill.<ref>Campaigns & Elections, [http://campaignsandelections.com/sc/releases/index.cfm?ID=5325 "Barrett Supports Bush On SCHIP,"] ''Campaigns & Elections''organizational website, October 18, 2007.</ref> [[Republican Party|Republicans]] and "some business groups" such as the Chamber contended SCHIP "should focus on poor children and the expansion [would be] a move towards government-run health care. They also worr[ied] identification rules in the [[Democratic Party|Democratic]] SCHIP bill might allow [[illegal immigration|illegal immigrants]] to obtain government coverage."<ref>Mike Sunnucks, [http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2007/10/15/daily42.html "SCHIP override falls short],"] ''The Business Journal of Phoenix'', October 18, 2007.</ref>
===Immigration amnesty and reform===
The Chamber, "among others, has pushed for immigration reforms that would allow a path to citizenship for undocumented workers."<ref>Josh Flory, [http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2007/oct/20/former-labor-secretary-author-calls-for-to/ "The Reich Way. Former labor secretary, author calls for Americans to reclaim democracy],"] Knoxville News Sentinel Co., October 20, 2007.</ref>
In January 2004, speaking in support of amnesty for illegal aliens, [[Randel Y. Johnson]], Chamber vice president for labor, immigration and employee benefits, said: "We need a system of 'earned targeted adjustment' for undocumented workers that fill vital roles in our economy, which would enable them to achieve legal status. We also need to expand permanent and temporary visas for workers to enter the United States legally to meet future workforce requirements."<ref>Federation for American Immigration Reform, [http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecentersa5ad "Organizations Supporting Amnesty for Illegal Aliens],"] [[Federation for American Immigration Reform]] (FAIR)organizational website, undatedaccessed May 24 2013.</ref>
===Social Security===
The Chamber ranks first in lobbying spending in the past decade, with [[General Electric]] ranking second at $161 million, according to the [[Center for Responsive Politics]].<ref>Dan Morain, [http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-money18oct18,1,2554878.story "Tinseltown filling campaign coffers. Democrats are reaping the benefits of wealthy and glamorous donors while entertainment executives hope to be heard in Washington,"] ''Los Angeles Times'', October 18, 2007.</ref>
''Political Money Line''<ref>[http://www.politicalmoneyline.com/ Political Money Line.]</ref> highlighted in February 2005 that the Chamber and its Institute for Legal Reform reported combined spending of $53.38 million for lobbying the Executive and Legislative branches during 2004. According to the watchdog website, "This is the ''largest twelve-month amount reported spent by any group''."<ref>Political Money Line Staff,[http://www.nytimes.com/cq/2007/02/23/cq_2318.html From Political Money Line: Chamber of Commerce Lobbying Skyrockets to New Record], The New York Times, February 23, 2007.</ref>
The Chamber reported spending $20,060,000 in the first six months of 2004 and $8,780,000 in the last six months of 2004. They paid forty-five lobbyists in the last six months of 2004 to lobby on thirty-two issue areas, including "Trade, Small Business, Labor, Healthcare, Defense, Appropriations, Tort Reform and other areas."<ref>U.S. Chamber of Commerce, [http://web.archive.org/web/20060917042146/http://sopr.senate.gov/cgi-win/opr_gifviewer.exe?/2005/01/000/031/000031109|138 Lobbying Report for 2004: Chamber of Commerce of the USA], organizational document - accessed via Wayback Machine,] Senate ID#8817 and House ID#31886000February 1, 2005.</ref>
The Institute for Legal Reform reported spending $10,000,000 in the first six months of 2004 and $14,540,000 in the last six months. They had five lobbyists on the payroll for the last six months of 2004, working on the tort reform issue including "Class Action Fairness, Asbestos Injury Resolution, Legal Reform, and Lawsuit Abuse Reduction."<ref>U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform, [http://web.archive.org/web/20060918150157/http://sopr.senate.gov/cgi-win/opr_gifviewer.exe?/2005/01/000/031/000031095|13 Lobbying Report for 2004: U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform],] Senate ID#51172organizational document -12accessed via Wayback Machine, House ID#34805000.</ref>
===Election cycle spending===
Other spending reported by ''Political Money Line'' or ''Open Secrets'':
*In 2007, $21.2 million total was spent by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and its subsidiary the Institute for Legal Reform (ILR); $11.78 million for the Chamber and $9.4 million by ILR.<ref>Center for Responsive Politics, [http://www.opensecrets.org/lobbyists/clientsum.asp?txtname=US+Chamber+of+Commerce&year=2007 Lobbying database, 2007: U.S. Chamber of Commerce], organizational website,] ''OpenSecrets.org''. Totals are as posted by accessed October 22, 2007.</ref>*In 2006, $72.7 million total was spent by the Chamber and ILR; $45.7 million for the Chamber and $27 million for the ILR.<ref>Center for Responsive Politics, [http://www.opensecrets.org/lobbyists/clientsum.asp?year=2006&txtname=US+Chamber+of+Commerce Lobbying database, 2006: U.S. Chamber of Commerce], organizational website, accessed October 22,] ''OpenSecrets.org''2007.</ref> *In 2005, $39.8 million total was spent by the Chamber and ILR; $20 million for the Chamber and $19.8 million for ILR.<ref>Center for Responsive Politics, [http://www.opensecrets.org/lobbyists/clientsum.asp?year=2005&txtname=US+Chamber+of+Commerce Lobbying database, 2005: U.S. Chamber of Commerce], organizational website, accessed October 22,] ''OpenSecrets.org''2007.</ref>*In 2004, $53.4 million total was spent by the Chamber and ILR; $28.8 million for the Chamber and $24.5 million for ILR.<ref>Center for Responsive Politics, [http://www.opensecrets.org/lobbyists/clientsum.asp?year=2004&txtname=US+Chamber+of+Commerce Lobbying database, 2004: U.S. Chamber of Commerce], organizational website, accessed October 22,] ''OpenSecrets2007.org''</ref>
*In 2003, $34.6 million total was spent by the Chamber and ILR. For the period 7/1/03 to 6/30/04 they spent $47.8 million.
*In 2002, $41.56 million total was spent by the Chamber and ILR. For the period 7/1/02 to 6/30/03 they spent $45.6 million.
==The Chamber and large corporations==
The Chamber claims to represent 3 million businesses, 96 percent of which are small, defined as having fewer than 100 employees. But the Chamber arrives at this figure by counting all businesses that are members of state and local chambers, which are independent organizations that pay a few hundreds dollars a year to affiliate with the U.S. Chamber for discounts and other programs and have no say over the national group's political activities, its lobbying, or endorsements. The U.S. Chamber's membership is actually about 300,000 businesses, and the Chamber's boardroom is mostly representatives of large corporations. Its 125-member board includes representatives of just two local chambers and a handful of small businesses. The rest are primarily from large corporations, like [[Pfizer]], [[Alcoa]], and [[JP Morgan Chase]]. In 2008, one-third of the $147 million the group raised came from just 19 companies.<ref name=sm>Stacy Mitchell, [http://www.yesmagazine.org/new-economy/will-the-real-voice-of-small-business-please-stand-up "Will the Real Voice of Small Business Please Stand Up?"] , Yes! Magazine, Nov. 2, 2010.</ref> In 2010, the watchdog group U.S. ChamberWatch used a disclosure law to see the Chamber's [[IRS 990]] form. It showed that 55 percent of its funding came from just 16 companies, each of which gave more than a million dollars.<ref>Bill McKibben, [http://www.grist.org/article/2011-02-22-the-u.s.-chamber-of-commerce-darkens-the-skies "The Chamber of Commerce is darkening our skies"] , Grist, Feb. 22, 2011.</ref> (Exactly which companies is unknown. U. S. law requires the Chamber to list amounts given on its annual tax return, but it is not obligated to disclose names.)<ref name=sm/>
In 2010, chambers in San Antonio, New York, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Connecticut began publicly moving away from the U.S. Chamber, disavowing the 2010 political attack ads that the U.S. Chamber had been broadcasting in their communities. Newer chambers, like the South Carolina Small Business Chamber of Commerce, have declined to affiliate with the national group and have been among its most vocal critics: "They get the majority of their funding from big businesses. That's who drives their decisions," explains Executive Director Frank Knapp, noting that, unlike the U. S. Chamber, his group supported the health care bill and financial reform, and favors legislation to curb [[global warming]].<ref name=sm/>
==Alleged spying on critics==
In 2010, [[Aaron Barr]], CEO of the technology security company [[HBGary]] Federal, alleged that he could exploit social media to gather information about hackers like those who supported [[WikiLeaks]]. In early 2011, Barr claimed to have used his techniques to infiltrate the [[Wikileaks]] supporter [[Anonymous]], partly by using IRC, Facebook, Twitter, and social networking sites. His e-mails depict his intention to release information on the identities of Anonymous members and to sell it to possible clients.<ref name="arstechnicacom1">Nate Anderson,[http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/02/how-one-security-firm-tracked-anonymousand-paid-a-heavy-price.ars How one man tracked down Anonymous - and paid a heavy price] By Nate Anderson, updated 2-10-2011, Ars Technica, retr Feb 9 2011-02-11.</ref>
</ref> In early February of 2011, the activist group [[Anonymous]] hacked the firm's website, copied tens of thousands of documents from HBGary, posted tens of thousands of company emails online, and usurped Barr's Twitter account.<ref name="arstechnicacom2">
{{cite web| last=[[Peter Bright|first=Peter| title=Anonymous speaks: the inside story of the HBGary hack| url=, [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/02/anonymous-speaks-the-inside-story-of-the-hbgary-hack.ars/ |work=Law & Disorder: Tech Law and Policy in the Digital Age |publisher=], Ars Technica| accessdate=18 , February 15, 2011| location=San Francisco| date=2011-02-15}}.</ref>
According to some of HBGary's e-mails, the [[Chamber of Commerce]] hired the lobbying firm [[Hunton & Williams]], and attorneys for the law firm then solicited a set of private security firms — HB Gary Federal, Palantir, and Berico Technologies (collectively called Team Themis) — to develop a sabotage campaign against progressive groups and labor unions, including the group [[ThinkProgress]], the labor coalition [[Change to Win]], the labor union [[SEIU]], [[U.S. Chamber Watch]], and [[StopTheChamber.com]]. Later emails revealed that the private spy company investigated the families and children of the Chamber’s political opponents. The apparent spearhead of this project was Aaron Barr, who circulated numerous emails and documents detailing information about political opponents’ children, spouses, and personal lives.<ref>Joseph Romm, [http://climateprogress.org/2011/02/13/shocker-chamber-of-commerce-lobbyists-solicited-firm-to-investigate-opponents’-families-children/ "Bombshell: Chamber of Commerce lobbyists solicited firm to investigate opponents’ families, children"] , ThinkProgress, Feb. 13, 2011.</ref>
On February 10, 2011, the Chamber of Commerce issued a statement denying they hired HBGary,<ref name="commerce1">{{cite web| last=Collamore |first=Tom| title=More Baseless Attacks on the Chamber| url=http://www.chamberpost.com/2011/02/more-baseless-attacks-on-the-chamber/| publisher=US Chamber of Commerce| accessdate=18 February 2011| work=Chamber Post |location=Washington | date=2011-02-10}}</ref> calling the allegation a "baseless smear", and blaming the [[Center for American Progress]] and its blog, [[ThinkProgress]] for "the illusion of a connection between HBGary, its CEO Aaron Barr and the Chamber."<ref name="commerce2commerce1">{{cite web| last=Tom Collamore |first, [http://www.chamberpost.com/2011/02/more-baseless-attacks-on-the-chamber/ More Baseless Attacks on the Chamber], Free Enterprise, February 10, 2011.</ref><ref name="commerce2">Tom| title=Another Smear from the Center for American Progress| url=Collamore, [http://www.chamberpost.com/2011/02/another-smear-from-the-center-for-american-progress/| publisher=US Chamber of Commerce| accessdate=18 Another Smear from the Center for American Progress], Free Enterprise, February 11, 2011| work=Chamber Post |location=Washington | date=2011-02-11}}.</ref>
==Chamber campaigns==
In June, 2011 the Chamber enlisted former White House Chief of Staff under President Bush [[Andrew Card]], and Democratic former Indiana Senator [[Evan Bayh]] to put on a national "road show" to rally businesses to oppose government regulations. The road show is being handled by Chamber employee [[Thomas Collamore]], who formerly was a vice president of [[Philip Morris Corporate Affairs]], the department at PM that was responsible for thwarting national efforts to reduce tobacco use. The Chamber planned to formally announce the Bayh and Card road show on June 22, 2011, and then start flying the two around the country in a push to gather support for reducing regulations designed to protect the environment, consumers and workers. The Chamber plans to fight the [[U.S. Environmental Protection Agency|Environmental Protection Agency's]] efforts to reduce greenhouse gases, push to minimize the power of the recently-created [[Consumer Financial Protection Bureau]], block implementation of [[Occupational Safety and Health Administration|OSHA]] workplace safety and health programs, hamper employees' ability to join unions, and make other pro-business reforms. The Chamber has [http://www.iwatchnews.org/2010/12/01/2282/chamber-seeks-cash-insurers-financial-firms-new-effort/page/0/1 spent months] soliciting millions of dollars in funding for this anti-regulatory effort from Wall Street financial firms, insurance and energy companies. <ref>Peter H. Stone , [http://www.iwatchnews.org/2011/06/07/4825/chamber-commerce-hires-odd-couple-evan-bayh-and-andy-card-anti-regs-roadshow Chamber of Commerce hires odd couple Evan Bayh and Andy Card for anti-regs roadshow] IWatchNews, June 7, 2011.</ref>
*[[Alliance for Energy and Economic Growth]]
*[[Business Civic Leadership Center]] (BCLC)
*[[Essential Worker Immigration Coalition]] (EWIC) member<ref>[http://www.ewicEWIC.org/Membershiplist.asp Membership list,Home] EWIC.org.</ref>
*[[Global Intellectual Property Center]] (GIPC), [[Caroline Joiner]], executive director<ref name="fibre"/>
*[[Global Regulatory Cooperation Project]]<ref>[[Deborah Platt Majoras]], [http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/majoras/070717coc.pdf Remarks of Deborah Platt Majoras, Chairman, Federal Trade Commission,] before the U.S. Chamber of Commerce on the launch of its Global Regulatory Cooperation Project, July 17, 2007,.</ref>
*[[Institute for a Competitive Workforce]] (ICW), [[Jan Magill]], director of strategic partnerships<ref>Nell Luter Ford, [http://www.clarionledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071021/BIZ/710210362/1005 "Still a job to do,"] ''The Clarion-Ledger'', October 21, 2007.</ref>
*[[Institute for Energy]]
==Senior management==
The following are listed as members of the Chamber's senior management.<ref>U.S. Chamber of Commerce, [http://www.uschamber.com/about/management Management,] USChamber.comorganizational website, accessed May 9 2013.</ref>
*[[Thomas J. Donohue]] - President and CEO
*[[David C. Chavern]] - Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
*[[John Sullivan]] - Executive Director, Center for International Private Enterprise
*[[Agnes Warfield-Blanc]] - Senior Vice President, Development
 
Also see the lists of regional vice chairmen;<ref>[http://www.uschamber.com/about/board/regional.htm Regional,] USChamber.com, accessed October 22, 2007.</ref> the senior council;<ref>[http://www.uschamber.com/about/board/senior.htm Senior,] USChamber.com, accessed October 22, 2007.</ref> and all members of the board of directors.<ref>[http://www.uschamber.com/about/board/all.htm All,] USChamber.com, accessed October 22, 2007.</ref>
==Contact information==
542

edits