developer, editor
60,576
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
add PR week material re account out for tender
Bell Pottinger's concern about the pro-nuclear credentials of the select committee members certainly seems to have little relevance to the NDA's mission statement: "To deliver a world class programme of safe, cost-effective, accelerated and environmentally responsible decommissioning of the UK's civil nuclear legacy in an open and transparent manner and with due regard to the socio-economic impacts on our communities." [http://www.nda.gov.uk/default.aspx?pg=9]
In August 2006, ''PR Week'' reported that the NDA has put its whole PR account up for tender including "strategic counsel, PA [public affairs] and stakeholder engagement. It also covers promotion of the NDA's role in encouraging local economic regeneration." [http://www.prweek.com/uk/news/article/575511/] (Sub req'd). It is understood that Bell Pottinger will repitch for the account.
==Pay it again, Sam: the case of the missing £15bn==
===Articles===
*"[http://www.bppa.co.uk/news1.htm Nuclear Decommissioning Authority appoints Bell Pottinger]", press release, Bell Pottinger Public Affairs, 2005.
*"[http://www.spinwatch.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1934 Nuclear family]", ''Private Eye'' via SpinWatch, No. 1146, November 25, 2005. About the Bell Pottinger NDA contract.
*Sarah Robertson, "[http://www.prweek.com/uk/news/article/575511/ Nuclear waste body NDA in comms review]", ''PR Week"", August 3, 2006. (Sub req'd).
[[Category:Nuclear power]]
[[Category:United Kingdom]]
