developer, editor
60,576
edits
Changes
exp on additions/changes
I added new information concerning the IAEA letter.
==IAEA details==
I have added the original key IAEA concerns for context. These are specific and substantive issues while Hoekstra's letter, as reported by NewsMax, is general and rhetorical. Maybe there is more detail in the original letter but it is not available online that I can see). In the absence of a detailed response, Hoekstra's claims can't be taken seriously. After all, the gap between 3.6% and 90% deals a pretty substantial blow to the disingenous claim that the primary issue was over the deisgnation of Charlier as an inspector. --[[User:Bob Burton|Bob Burton]] 08:03, 3 Oct 2006 (EDT)