Methane is both a [[greenhouse gas]] and a contributor to background levels of [[ozone]]. Tropospheric ozone is a significant greenhouse gas and the primary constituent of photochemical [[smog]].<ref>[http://www.oar.noaa.gov/spotlite/2006/spot_methane.html "Linking climate and air pollution: Methane emission controls yield a double dividend"] NOAA, accessed November 2010.</ref>
==Methane time bomband climat change==
In September 2008, ''The Independent'' newspaper reported how preliminary scientific findings suggested that massive deposits of sub-sea methane were bubbling to the surface as the Arctic region becomes warmer and its ice retreats. This [[methane time-bomb]] is seen as extremely worrying, because it could be a positive feedback mechanism, where the more the Arctic melts the more methane is released, which could put us on the path to runaway [[global warming]].<ref> Steve Connor, [http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/exclusive-the-methane-time-bomb-938932.html "Exclusive: The methane time bomb"], ''The Independent'', September 23, 2008 </ref>
==Methane and coal=====Methane releases from coal mining===
Coal mining accounts for about 10 percent of US releases of methane.<ref name="EPA Methane">U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ,[http://www.epa.gov/methane/sources.html "Methane: sources and emissions,"] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency website, October 20th, 2006.</ref> It is the fourth largest source of methane, following landfills, natural gas systems, and enteric fermentation.<ref name="EPA Methane"/>
* '''Abandoned Mines:''' Methane emissions from abandoned mines are not quantified and included in U.S. inventory estimates, but may be significant.
===Coalbed methane===
[[Coalbed methane]] (CBM), also known as coal seam gas (abbreviated "CSG"), is a type of [[natural gas]] extracted from coal beds. It is formed by the geological process of heating and compressing plant matter to create coal. Over millions of years, methane forms within the coal. The methane is trapped by water in the gaps and cracks between the coal molecules. These gaps are known as cleats. [[Coal seam gas projects in Australia|Australia]] has been found to have many deposits, and is increasingly mining them through [[hydraulic fracturing]], also known as [[fracking]]. In recent decades, CBM has become an increasingly used source of energy in Australia, as well as the United States, Canada, and other countries.<ref name="bg">{{cite web|url=http://www.bg-group.com/Careers/graduates/howtoapply/Pages/JargonBuster.aspx|title=Jargon Buster|publisher=BG Group|accessdate=18 July 2010}}</ref>
==Biogenic methane production==Companies are looking into stimulating methane production for energy use. As of May 2010, Luca Technologies is working on a large scale pilot program in an old natural gas field west of Gillette, Wyoming, on a process called “biogenic methane production.” The process involves gravity feeding water and what the company calls “nutrients” down old methane wells to stimulate the native microbes in the coal seams to multiply and produce methane at an accelerated rate. Many believe it took millions of years for the microbes to make the methane now being extracted in the basin. Luca researchers think that with a little help, the microbes can make enough to extract methane at a profit in only a few years.<ref name="luca">Steve McManamen, [http://gillettenewsrecord.com/articles/2010/05/17/news/yesterday/news03.txt "Luca says natural gas industry is alive and well ... literally"] gillettenewsrecord.net, May 17, 2010.</ref> In 2001, Luca started work on the idea of biogenic methane production in its lab in Golden, Colorado. After years of study, the company began an initial pilot program near Sheridan with 100 wells in 2006. In 2008, the company bought 529 old wells west of Gillette from Kennedy Oil and added them to the roster. Luca bought another 725 former Devon Energy wells in the same area. With more than 1,350 wells, Luca believes it can grow methane on a commercial scale in the [[Powder River Basin]].<ref name="luca"/> ==Methane and coal mining explosions===
When coal is mined, fissures and pores in the coal bed in which methane is lying are exposed, releasing methane into the confined area. This can be dangerous because methane is not only highly flammable, with the potential to violently explode in a ball of flame, but is also an asphyxiant, capable of driving out oxygen and causing death by suffocation. A build up of hazardous gas in a mine is known as a damp, with methane build-ups called “fire damps”. Carbon monoxide accumulation, called “white damp,” adds to these dangers. When methane combusts, this highly toxic and flammable gas is generated as a by-product and spreads through a mine’s tunnels and shafts. [[Coal dust]] also reacts badly to a methane explosion. As part of a violent chain reaction, it can burst into flames in a series of secondary explosions throughout a mine.<ref name="mgd">[http://www.methanegasdetectors.com/info/coal-mining-and-the-risk-of-methane-gas-explosions/ "Coal Mining and The Risk Of Methane Gas Explosions"] Methanegasdetectors.com, accessed September 2010.</ref>
The 1907 [[Monongah Mine Disaster]] of [[West Virginia]], which claimed the lives of 362 men and boys and is known as the worst mining disaster in American History,<ref>[http://www.msha.gov/MSHAINFO/FactSheets/MSHAFCT8.HTM Historical Data on Mine Disasters in the United States], U.S. Department of Labor website, accessed November 2009.</ref><ref>[http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/statistics/discoal.htm Coal Mining Disasters], National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, accessed November 2009.</ref> is thought to have been caused by the ignition of methane, which in turn ignited highly flammable [[coal dust]].<ref name="monogah">[http://www.boisestate.edu/history/ncasner/hy210/mining.htm "Monongah Mining Disaster"] Boise State Website, accessed November 2009</ref>
====Methane and the Upper Big Branch Mine Disaster====
In July 2010, an electrician at the [[Upper Big Branch Mine]], site of the [[Upper Big Branch Mine Disaster]] in April 2010, confirmed that he was ordered to bypass the methane detector on a piece of mining equipment. Such detectors are designed to automatically turn off a machine once methane reaches a certain level; with the detector bypassed, the machine would continue operating regardless of methane levels. The detector was on a continuous mining machine four miles from the origins of the explosion and was not thought to have played a role in the explosion. Investigators, however, are now looking to see if the practice of bypassing the detectors had happened in other areas of the mine, something that could point to wider questions about safety practices at the mine. Micah Ragland, spokesman for Massey Energy, confirmed that someone had bridged the methane monitor.<ref name="dr">Dennis B. Roddy and Daniel Malloy, [http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10196/1072880-84.stm#ixzz0tmeQ0Bzh "Detector bypassed before W.Va. coal disaster"] Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, July 15, 2010.</ref>
Federal investigators first learned of the monitor bridging from Ricky Lee Campbell, a former Upper Big Branch miner who was fired from his job at another Massey mine after he publicly criticized safety practices at Upper Big Branch. Massey lawyers said Mr. Campbell was fired for violating a safety rule at the company's Marfork Coal Co., but in June 2010, Department of Labor officials won temporary reinstatement of Mr. Campbell after an administrative law judge ruled that he had actually been fired in retaliation for speaking out. According to Campbell, he and two other miners at Upper Big Branch saw a supervisor instruct Mr. Holtzapfel to run a wire that would bypass a methane detector on a continuous mining machine on Feb. 13 -- seven weeks before the blast. Campbell said Holtzapfel had protested the order, calling it improper, but was forced to make the bridge. When told of Mr. Campbell's account, Mr. Holtzapfel said, "That's how it went."<ref name="dr"/>
==Methane and gas production==
===Methane leakage from oil/gas wells===
Various studies by academics, government, and industry have found that methane leakage can range from less than 1 percent to as much as 8 percent of the natural gas produced each year. The difference is attributed to the small amount of raw data available and variations in the way the data are interpreted.<ref name=gv>Gayathri Vaidyanathan and Saqib Rahim, "Data-heavy project aims to move methane emissions research beyond 'he said, she said,'"] E&E, October 15, 2012.</ref>
Using the small data available from the oil/gas industry so far, EPA has estimated that 2.8 percent of gas produced from a well each year leaks. Oil/gas companies and [[Devon Energy]], in particular, have criticized EPA for relying on what they say is a small, outdated sample with data gaps.<ref name=gv/>
A [http://www.sustainablefuture.cornell.edu/news/attachments/Howarth-EtAl-2011.pdf 2011 study] out of Cornell University found leakage of 2.2 to 3.9 percent of produced gas per well, and up to 8 percent.<ref name=gv/>
A 2012 NOAA study to be published in the ''Journal of Geophysical Research'' is considered the most authoritative because scientists based it on actual measurements of leakage at Colorado gas fields in 2008. That study found that about 4 percent of the 202 billion cubic feet of gas produced that year may have leaked in the Denver-Julesburg Basin. NOAA's assumptions have been challenged, most prominently by Michael Levi, director of the Program on Energy Security and Climate Change at the Council on Foreign Relations, who reworked the raw data of the NOAA study without the same assumptions, Levi has found leakage of 1.3 to 2.3 percent.<ref name=gv/>
In October 2012 the University of Texas, Austin, the Environmental Defense Fund, and nine major natural gas companies said that, in January 2013, the group will begin publishing raw data, collected at their drilling sites, and offer them for peer review.<ref name=gv/>
In September 2012 researchers at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the University of Colorado in Boulder reported preliminary results from a field study in the Uinta Basin of Utah suggesting methane leakage of up to 9% of total gas production, nearly double the cumulative loss rates estimated from industry data. The NOAA researchers collected their data in February 2012 as part of a broader analysis of air pollution in the Uinta Basin, using ground-based equipment and an aircraft to make detailed measurements of various pollutants, including methane concentrations.<ref>Jeff Tollefson, [http://www.nature.com/news/methane-leaks-erode-green-credentials-of-natural-gas-1.12123#/ref-link-5 "Methane leaks erode green credentials of natural gas,"] Nature 493, 12, January 2, 2013.</ref>
===Gas flaring===
Global gas flaring crept up by 4.5 percent to around 140 billion cubic meters (bcm) in 2011, up from 134 bcm the previous year, and the first rise since 2008, preliminary data from the World Bank shows. Flaring of the gas ([[methane]]) is used to eliminate gas at mineral exploration sites, and is released via pressure relief valves to ease the strain on equipment. The increase is mostly due to the rise in shale oil exploration in North Dakota. Globally, flaring amounts to around 4.5 percent of global industrial emissions.<ref>Henning Gloystein and Alessandra Prentice, "Exclusive: Shale causes rise in waste gas pollution," Reuters, May 2, 2012.</ref>
In addition to methane, gas- and oil-suffused bedrock contains many toxic hydrocarbons, some of them volatile gases. As soon as a hole is drilled into the formations, the fugitive native gases can escape, including [[benzene]].<ref>Sandra Steingraber, [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sandra-steingraber/safe-hydrofracking_b_1520574.html "Safe Hydrofracking Is the New Jumbo Shrimp,"] HuffPo, June 4, 2012.</ref>
==Biogenic methane production==
Companies are looking into stimulating methane production for energy use. As of May 2010, Luca Technologies is working on a large scale pilot program in an old natural gas field west of Gillette, Wyoming, on a process called “biogenic methane production.” The process involves gravity feeding water and what the company calls “nutrients” down old methane wells to stimulate the native microbes in the coal seams to multiply and produce methane at an accelerated rate. Many believe it took millions of years for the microbes to make the methane now being extracted in the basin. Luca researchers think that with a little help, the microbes can make enough to extract methane at a profit in only a few years.<ref name="luca">Steve McManamen, [http://gillettenewsrecord.com/articles/2010/05/17/news/yesterday/news03.txt "Luca says natural gas industry is alive and well ... literally"] gillettenewsrecord.net, May 17, 2010.</ref>
In 2001, Luca started work on the idea of biogenic methane production in its lab in Golden, Colorado. After years of study, the company began an initial pilot program near Sheridan with 100 wells in 2006. In 2008, the company bought 529 old wells west of Gillette from Kennedy Oil and added them to the roster. Luca bought another 725 former Devon Energy wells in the same area. With more than 1,350 wells, Luca believes it can grow methane on a commercial scale in the [[Powder River Basin]].<ref name="luca"/>
==Resources==