2,468
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
SW: →2011 Michael Mann e-mails: added Schnare EPA work & statements
}}</ref>
What had changed? University of Virginia court filings[http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/scientific_integrity/ATI-UVA-support-memorandum.pdf][http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/scientific_integrity/ATI-UVA-Kast-affidavit.pdf] had argued that ATI publicity and actions of ATI principals [[David W. Schnare]] and [[Christopher Horner]] - who were both the attorneys and the petitioners in this case - had raised serious questions about whether as attorneys they could be trusted to abide by the previous ruling's requirement to keep the content of the exempt emails private.<ref>{{cite web
|publisher=Union of Concerned Scientists
|title=Timeline: Legal Harassment of Climate Scientist Michael Mann
|accessdate=2011-11-03
|quote=October 18: UVA files a petition with the court to alter the protective order, agreeing that it would be inappropriate to disclose exempt emails to ATI. In a supporting memorandum and a more extensive affidavit, UVA attorney Richard Kast outlines two concerns: first, regarding statements that ATI attorneys made on their website and in the press, and second, regarding how ATI attorney David Schnare represented his employment with the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
}}</ref>; according to one affidavit, Schnare had initially neglected to mention that he was still employed by the Environmental Protection Agency, then when challenged, asserted that the EPA had given him permission to do outside work such as this lawsuit for ATI; but the EPA denied having given Schnare this permission.[http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/scientific_integrity/ATI-UVA-Kast-affidavit.pdf]
===2009 Colorado campaigns - corporate money and disclosures===
