Difference between revisions of "Richard A. Clarke"

From SourceWatch
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 23: Line 23:
 
"Most acquaintances do not regard him as a partisan. Clarke was viewed as a hawk and 'true believer' by many within the [[Clinton administration]], and Clarke himself says he is an independent who is registered as a Republican." [http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/washpost/20040323/ts_washpost/a16192_2004mar22]
 
"Most acquaintances do not regard him as a partisan. Clarke was viewed as a hawk and 'true believer' by many within the [[Clinton administration]], and Clarke himself says he is an independent who is registered as a Republican." [http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/washpost/20040323/ts_washpost/a16192_2004mar22]
 
--------
 
--------
Unknowingly, Ewen MacAskill, in his April 4, 2003, article [http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,929464,00.html "Blair 'dissuaded Bush from attack after 9/11',"] supports Clarke's contention that the [[Bush administration]] wanted to make its retaliatory strike against "terrorists" in Iraq, not against al Qaeda in [[Afghanistan]]:  
+
Unknowingly at the time, Ewen MacAskill, in his April 4, 2003, article [http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,929464,00.html "Blair 'dissuaded Bush from attack after 9/11',"] supports Clarke's contention that the [[Bush administration]] wanted to make its retaliatory strike against "terrorists" in Iraq, not against al Qaeda in [[Afghanistan]]:  
  
 
:"Hawks in the Bush administration, mainly the deputy defence secretary, Paul Wolfowitz, pushed for an attack on Iraq rather than Afghanistan in the aftermath of September 11.  
 
:"Hawks in the Bush administration, mainly the deputy defence secretary, Paul Wolfowitz, pushed for an attack on Iraq rather than Afghanistan in the aftermath of September 11.  
Line 31: Line 31:
 
The question, then, is this: Where did the Bush White House come by the idea that Iraq was "the" threat? Peter Bergen emphasizes that "the belief that [[Saddam posed an imminent threat]] to the United States amounted to a theological conviction within the administration, a conviction successfully sold to the American public," then pointed directly to [[Laurie Mylroie]] in his December 2003 ''Washington Monthly'' article [http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0312.bergen.html "Armchair Provocateur": Laurie Mylroie: The Neocons' favorite conspiracy theorist"].
 
The question, then, is this: Where did the Bush White House come by the idea that Iraq was "the" threat? Peter Bergen emphasizes that "the belief that [[Saddam posed an imminent threat]] to the United States amounted to a theological conviction within the administration, a conviction successfully sold to the American public," then pointed directly to [[Laurie Mylroie]] in his December 2003 ''Washington Monthly'' article [http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0312.bergen.html "Armchair Provocateur": Laurie Mylroie: The Neocons' favorite conspiracy theorist"].
  
:"She laid out her case in ''Study of Revenge: Saddam Hussein's Unfinished War Against America'', a book published by [the [[American Enterprise Institute]]] in 2000 which makes it clear that Mylroie and the [[neocon]] hawks worked hand in glove to push her theory that Iraq was behind the '93 Trade Center bombing. Its acknowledgements fulsomely thanked [[John R. Bolton]] and the staff of AEI for their assistance, while [[Richard Perle]] glowingly blurbed the book as 'splendid and wholly convincing.' [[Lewis I. Libby]], now Vice President [[Dick Cheney]]'s chief of staff, is thanked for his 'generous and timely assistance.' And it appears that Paul Wolfowitz himself was instrumental in the genesis of ''Study of Revenge'': His then-wife is credited with having 'fundamentally shaped the book,' while of Wolfowitz, she says: 'At critical times, he provided crucial support for a project that is inherently difficult.'
+
:"She laid out her case in ''Study of Revenge: Saddam Hussein's Unfinished War Against America'', a book published by [the [[American Enterprise Institute]]] in 2000 which makes it clear that Mylroie and the [[neocon]] hawks worked hand in glove to push her theory that Iraq was behind the '93 Trade Center bombing. Its acknowledgements fulsomely thanked [[John R. Bolton]] and the staff of AEI for their assistance, while [[Richard Perle]] glowingly blurbed the book as 'splendid and wholly convincing.' [[I Lewis (Scooter) Libby]], now Vice President [[Dick Cheney]]'s chief of staff, is thanked for his 'generous and timely assistance.' And it appears that Paul Wolfowitz himself was instrumental in the genesis of ''Study of Revenge'': His then-wife is credited with having 'fundamentally shaped the book,' while of Wolfowitz, she says: 'At critical times, he provided crucial support for a project that is inherently difficult.'
  
 
:"None of which," Bergan opines, "was out of the ordinary, except for this: Mylroie became enamored of her theory that Saddam was the mastermind of a vast anti-U.S. terrorist conspiracy in the face of virtually all evidence and expert opinion to the contrary. In what amounts to the discovery of a unified field theory of terrorism, Mylroie believes that Saddam was not only behind the '93 Trade Center attack, but also every anti-American terrorist incident of the past decade, from the bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania to the leveling of the federal building in Oklahoma City to September 11 itself. She is, in short, a crackpot, which would not be significant if she were merely advising say, [[Lyndon LaRouche]]. But her neocon friends who went on to run the war in Iraq believed her theories, bringing her on as a consultant at the Pentagon, and they seem to continue to entertain her eccentric belief that Saddam is the fount of the entire shadow war against America."
 
:"None of which," Bergan opines, "was out of the ordinary, except for this: Mylroie became enamored of her theory that Saddam was the mastermind of a vast anti-U.S. terrorist conspiracy in the face of virtually all evidence and expert opinion to the contrary. In what amounts to the discovery of a unified field theory of terrorism, Mylroie believes that Saddam was not only behind the '93 Trade Center attack, but also every anti-American terrorist incident of the past decade, from the bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania to the leveling of the federal building in Oklahoma City to September 11 itself. She is, in short, a crackpot, which would not be significant if she were merely advising say, [[Lyndon LaRouche]]. But her neocon friends who went on to run the war in Iraq believed her theories, bringing her on as a consultant at the Pentagon, and they seem to continue to entertain her eccentric belief that Saddam is the fount of the entire shadow war against America."
Line 103: Line 103:
 
*Phil Carter, [http://philcarter.blogspot.com/2004_03_01_philcarter_archive.html#107997395815959619 "White House engages in public duel with former counter-terrorism aide. Comments reveal deeper issues with White House decisionmaking in the war on terrorism,"] ''philcarter.blogspot.com'', March 22, 2004: "Analysis: I find it interesting that the White House has chosen to engage the Clarke criticisms on the level of his personal credibility -- not the truth of the matters asserted. Surely, there are classification and security issues at stake which may preclude a full and fair response by the White House to the Clarke book on the merits. But given the political stakes of this issue -- which could ultimately decide the November 2004 election -- I would think the White House would find some way to actually rebut Clarke's claims (if they weren't true) using unclassified arguments."
 
*Phil Carter, [http://philcarter.blogspot.com/2004_03_01_philcarter_archive.html#107997395815959619 "White House engages in public duel with former counter-terrorism aide. Comments reveal deeper issues with White House decisionmaking in the war on terrorism,"] ''philcarter.blogspot.com'', March 22, 2004: "Analysis: I find it interesting that the White House has chosen to engage the Clarke criticisms on the level of his personal credibility -- not the truth of the matters asserted. Surely, there are classification and security issues at stake which may preclude a full and fair response by the White House to the Clarke book on the merits. But given the political stakes of this issue -- which could ultimately decide the November 2004 election -- I would think the White House would find some way to actually rebut Clarke's claims (if they weren't true) using unclassified arguments."
 
*[[Drudge Report]], [http://www.drudgereport.com/cbsrc.htm "News for Sale: CBS Pushed Book It Owns; '60 Minutes' Did Not Reveal Parent Company's Financial Stake in Clarke Project,"] March 22, 2004.
 
*[[Drudge Report]], [http://www.drudgereport.com/cbsrc.htm "News for Sale: CBS Pushed Book It Owns; '60 Minutes' Did Not Reveal Parent Company's Financial Stake in Clarke Project,"] March 22, 2004.
*Poster ''Laura'', [http://www.warandpiece.com/ "Does Bush really want to make his reaction to 9/11 the centerpiece of his reelection campaign? His reaction, really closely examined?"] (contains extract from registration-required ''Wall Street Journal'' article), ''WarandPeace.com'', March 22, 2004. Also [http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=615&e=5&u=/nm/20040322/pl_nm/economy_treasury_oneill_dc "O'Neill cleared, just in time to investigate Clarke, perhaps."]
+
*Poster ''Laura'', [http://www.warandpiece.com/ "Does Bush really want to make his reaction to 9/11 the centerpiece
*[[Condoleezza Rice]], [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A13881-2004Mar21.html "9/11: For The Record,"] ''Washington Post'', March 22, 2004.
 
*Paula Zahn, [http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0403/22/pzn.00.html Transcript: "Bush Administration Strikes Back Against Critics; No Smoking on the Beach?,"] ''Paula Zahn Now''/CNN.com, March 22, 2004.
 
*Mark A.R. Kleiman, [http://www.markarkleiman.com/archives/george_bush_and_campaign_2004_/2004/03/slime_defend_hits_richard_clarke.php "Slime & defend hits Richard Clarke,"] ''markarkleiman.com'', March 22, 2004: "Just checked in with one of my pro-war, pro-Bush national security expert friends. Here's what I learned..." Follow updates to the original posting.
 
*Oliver Willis, [http://www.oliverwillis.com/ "Substance, Not Slime,"] ''oliverwillis.com'', March 22, 2004. Follow updates to original posting.
 
*''Katherine R.'', [http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/obsidian_wings/2004/03/corroboration_o.html "Corroboration of Clarke's account,"] ''Obsidian Wings'', March 22, 2004.
 
*Dana Milbank and Mike Allen, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A16200-2004Mar22.html "White House Counters Ex-Aide. Advisers Call Clarke Disgruntled, Partisan,"] ''Washington Post'', March 23, 2004: "Sen. [[Chuck Hagel]] (R-Neb.) said he believes the White House has to respond directly to Clarke's allegations rather than question his credibility. 'This is a serious book written by a serious professional who's made serious charges, and the White House must respond to these charges,' he said."
 
*Dan Eggen and Walter Pincus, [http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/washpost/20040323/ts_washpost/a16192_2004mar22 "The Book On Richard Clarke,"] ''Washington Post'', March 23, 2004.
 
*David Morgan, [http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20040323/pl_nm/security_bush_dc_14 "White House Says Ex-Terror Czar Has It All Wrong,"] Reuters, March 23, 2004.
 
*Chaim Kupferberg, [http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=76&contentid=1015 "Richard A. Clarke Creates Legend of 9-11 and Osama,"] ''Conspiracy Planet'', March 23, 2004. Also see ''Global Research'' [http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/KUP312A.html Article Extract], December 6, 2003, and original article [http://globalresearch.ca/articles/KUP310A.html "There's Something About Omar: Truth, Lies, and The Legend of 9/11,"] October 21, 2003.
 
*Josh Marshall, Re Richard A. Clarke [http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/ March 23, 2004] and [http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2004_03_21.php#002742 March 22, 2004], ''Talking Points Memo''.
 
*Barton Gellman, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A13607-2004Mar21.html "Memoir Criticizes Bush 9/11 Response. President Pushed Iraq Link, Aide Says,"] ''Washington Post'', March 23, 2004.
 

Revision as of 13:59, 23 March 2004

Richard A. Clarke resigned in January 2003 as "anti-terrorism czar", after serving under three presidents (George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush) before leaving the White House. [1] [2] [3]


Clarke, "an internationally recognized expert on security, including homeland security, national security, cyber security, and counterterrorism [and] currently an on-air consultant for ABC News," is Chairman of Good Harbor Consulting, LLC. [4]

"Clarke served the last three Presidents as a senior White House Advisor. Over the course of an unprecedented 11 consecutive years of White House service, he held the titles of: [5]

  • Special Assistant to the President for Global Affairs
  • National Coordinator for Security and Counter-terrorism
  • Special Advisor to the President for Cyber Security

"Prior to his White House years, Clarke served for 19 years in the Pentagon, the Intelligence Community, and State Department. During the Reagan Administration, he was Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence. During the Bush (41) Administration, he was Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs and coordinated diplomatic efforts to support the 1990-1991 Gulf War and the subsequent security arrangements." [6]


In their March 23, 2004, Washington Post article "The Book on Richard Clarke", Dan Eggen and Walter Pincus provide a profile of Clarke and comment on his recently released book Against All Enemies.

"Strong opinions are the norm when it comes to Dick Clarke. A 30-year veteran bureaucrat, Clarke rose to the uppermost ranks of the national security establishment under presidents of both parties but also managed to anger numerous colleagues with his brusque style and bursts of temper. His previous boss, former national security adviser Samuel R. 'Sandy' Berger, has said he regularly had to turn down demands from colleagues that Clarke be fired. [7]

"Clarke's brash manner is on full display in Against All Enemies, a searing portrait of missteps and misjudgments in the war on terror. While laying some blame on the former Bush and Clinton administrations, Clarke is most explicit in his criticism of George W. Bush and his top advisers, particularly Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and his deputy, Paul D. Wolfowitz. They are portrayed as indifferent to al Qaeda but obsessed with Iraq and Saddam Hussein, even in the wake of attacks carried out by Osama bin Laden's terrorist organization." [8]

"He also has chosen to release his book and to sit for a lengthy '60 Minutes' interview, on the eve of hearings today and Wednesday by the independent commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Clarke, who left the Bush administration last year after a public demotion, is a scheduled witness. [9]

"The timing is classic Clarke, according to many who know him well. Former colleagues say Clarke is a wily tactician in the political world of Washington and would be well aware of the firestorm he would cause by the release of his book during a presidential campaign. [10]

"Most acquaintances do not regard him as a partisan. Clarke was viewed as a hawk and 'true believer' by many within the Clinton administration, and Clarke himself says he is an independent who is registered as a Republican." [11]


Unknowingly at the time, Ewen MacAskill, in his April 4, 2003, article "Blair 'dissuaded Bush from attack after 9/11'," supports Clarke's contention that the Bush administration wanted to make its retaliatory strike against "terrorists" in Iraq, not against al Qaeda in Afghanistan:

"Hawks in the Bush administration, mainly the deputy defence secretary, Paul Wolfowitz, pushed for an attack on Iraq rather than Afghanistan in the aftermath of September 11.
"Sir Christopher Meyer, in an interview with the US public broadcasting system last night, said that the prime minister (Tony Blair), arriving in Washington the week after an inconclusive discussion between George Bush and his key advisers at Camp David, swung in behind the US secretary of state, Colin L. Powell, who saw Afghanistan as the prime target."

The question, then, is this: Where did the Bush White House come by the idea that Iraq was "the" threat? Peter Bergen emphasizes that "the belief that Saddam posed an imminent threat to the United States amounted to a theological conviction within the administration, a conviction successfully sold to the American public," then pointed directly to Laurie Mylroie in his December 2003 Washington Monthly article "Armchair Provocateur": Laurie Mylroie: The Neocons' favorite conspiracy theorist".

"She laid out her case in Study of Revenge: Saddam Hussein's Unfinished War Against America, a book published by [the American Enterprise Institute] in 2000 which makes it clear that Mylroie and the neocon hawks worked hand in glove to push her theory that Iraq was behind the '93 Trade Center bombing. Its acknowledgements fulsomely thanked John R. Bolton and the staff of AEI for their assistance, while Richard Perle glowingly blurbed the book as 'splendid and wholly convincing.' I Lewis (Scooter) Libby, now Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, is thanked for his 'generous and timely assistance.' And it appears that Paul Wolfowitz himself was instrumental in the genesis of Study of Revenge: His then-wife is credited with having 'fundamentally shaped the book,' while of Wolfowitz, she says: 'At critical times, he provided crucial support for a project that is inherently difficult.'
"None of which," Bergan opines, "was out of the ordinary, except for this: Mylroie became enamored of her theory that Saddam was the mastermind of a vast anti-U.S. terrorist conspiracy in the face of virtually all evidence and expert opinion to the contrary. In what amounts to the discovery of a unified field theory of terrorism, Mylroie believes that Saddam was not only behind the '93 Trade Center attack, but also every anti-American terrorist incident of the past decade, from the bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania to the leveling of the federal building in Oklahoma City to September 11 itself. She is, in short, a crackpot, which would not be significant if she were merely advising say, Lyndon LaRouche. But her neocon friends who went on to run the war in Iraq believed her theories, bringing her on as a consultant at the Pentagon, and they seem to continue to entertain her eccentric belief that Saddam is the fount of the entire shadow war against America."

March 19, 2001: "The President intends to designate Richard A. Clarke to be Chair of the President's Critical Infrastructure Protection Board. Clarke was recently named Special Advisor to the President for Cyber Space Security and was previously the National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection and Counter-terrorism on the National Security Council. Clarke is a member of the Senior Executive Service, having begun his federal service in 1973. He is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania and Massachusetts Institute of Technology." [12]

"Richard Clarke [served as] a career member of the Senior Executive Service, having begun his federal service in 1973 in the Office of the Secretary of Defense." [13]


March 12, 2003: "Career highlights: Chairman, President's Critical Infrastructure Protection Board (resigned Jan. 31[, 2003]); chaired interagency counterterrorism committee for nine years; served on National Security Council staff under President Bush and President Bill Clinton, covering U.N. peacekeeping, Haiti intervention, Persian Gulf security and international crime control; assistant secretary of state for politico-military affairs in first Bush administration, coordinating State Department support of the Persian Gulf War; deputy assistant secretary of state for intelligence in Reagan administration; joined State in 1979 as senior analyst for European arms control; analyst on nuclear weapons and European issues, Defense Department." [14]


Affiliations


SourceWatch Resources

External Links

Dated Material