Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
This article preys on the gullible to direct prejudice toward people who use language creatively. There is no evidence presented here, for example, that the term "terminate with extreme prejudice" was ever used outside of Hollywood. Other terms, "pre-owned" for example, are simply flexible use of a language that offers a variety of ways to make the same statement. There is absolutely no evidence presented here of intent to decieve, except for the intent of those who describe routine speach as doublespeak for the purpose of politically damaging the speaker.
----
ah .. now I've got it ... "speach" .. "speaker" .. always wondered where that came from ....
-----
And a group that destroys property, killing thousands of civilians for a political ideal rejected by those holding similar ideals more willing to comprimise is not a "criminal extremist organization" while someone who responds to the invitation that "''Anyone'' including ''you'' can edit an article now" is a '''vandal''' if some industry funded (CNN/Tuner>CMD) executive (SR) needs to squash dissent.
