Difference between revisions of "Asymmetric warfare"
m (add to Category:Doublespeak) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The term '''asymmetric warfare''' was coined to describe activities of [[saboteur]]s, [[partisan]]s, or [[assassin]]s who were not clearly engaged in either [[war]] (declared nation state hostility) or [[ | + | The term '''asymmetric warfare''' was coined to describe activities of [[saboteur]]s, [[partisan]]s, or [[assassin]]s who were not clearly engaged in either [[war]] (declared nation state hostility) or [[terrorism]] (attacks on civilians, by most definitions, for media and thus political attention) activities. |
| − | For [[organized crime]] or groups that attack civilians but seek to avoid the consequential labelling as [[terrorist]], this term can provide them with cover. | + | For [[organized crime]], or groups that attack civilians but seek to avoid the consequential labelling as [[terrorist]], this term can provide them with cover. |
For states, it justifies treating hostiles as combatants, thus killing them without the formalities of evidence, arrest, trial and sentencing. It also justifies support for friendlies engaged in acts one would avoid oneself. It also tends to suggest that, since it is 'warfare', prisoners caught engaging, or suspected of engaging, in such acts, should be considered [[combatant]]s even if 'out of uniform' (there is often no 'uniform' or even consistent mark of rank). | For states, it justifies treating hostiles as combatants, thus killing them without the formalities of evidence, arrest, trial and sentencing. It also justifies support for friendlies engaged in acts one would avoid oneself. It also tends to suggest that, since it is 'warfare', prisoners caught engaging, or suspected of engaging, in such acts, should be considered [[combatant]]s even if 'out of uniform' (there is often no 'uniform' or even consistent mark of rank). | ||
| − | The US and Israel coined the term [[illegal combatant]] to escape [[Geneva | + | The US and [[Israel]] coined the term [[illegal combatant]] to escape [[Geneva Conventions]] (i.e. rules) on how to treat combatants, and both have prisoners in indefinite custody without a right to counsel, trial, or eventual release. Usually there is no way or motive to cease hostility with [[non-state actor]]s. |
See also the [[w:asymmetric warfare|Wikipedia article on asymmetric warfare]]. | See also the [[w:asymmetric warfare|Wikipedia article on asymmetric warfare]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Related SourceWatch Resources== | ||
| + | *[[enemy combatant]] | ||
| + | *[[rogue state]] | ||
| + | *[[transnational organized crime]] | ||
[[Category:Doublespeak]] | [[Category:Doublespeak]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:30, 10 June 2005
The term asymmetric warfare was coined to describe activities of saboteurs, partisans, or assassins who were not clearly engaged in either war (declared nation state hostility) or terrorism (attacks on civilians, by most definitions, for media and thus political attention) activities.
For organized crime, or groups that attack civilians but seek to avoid the consequential labelling as terrorist, this term can provide them with cover.
For states, it justifies treating hostiles as combatants, thus killing them without the formalities of evidence, arrest, trial and sentencing. It also justifies support for friendlies engaged in acts one would avoid oneself. It also tends to suggest that, since it is 'warfare', prisoners caught engaging, or suspected of engaging, in such acts, should be considered combatants even if 'out of uniform' (there is often no 'uniform' or even consistent mark of rank).
The US and Israel coined the term illegal combatant to escape Geneva Conventions (i.e. rules) on how to treat combatants, and both have prisoners in indefinite custody without a right to counsel, trial, or eventual release. Usually there is no way or motive to cease hostility with non-state actors.
See also the Wikipedia article on asymmetric warfare.
