Changes

{{#Show badges: | CoalSwarm | nuclear spin}}'''Georgia Power''' describes itself as "an investor-owned, tax-paying utility that serves 2.25 million customers in all but four of Georgia's 159 counties." It is the largest of four electric utilities comprising [[Southern Company]].<ref>[http://www.georgiapower.com/about/home.asp Georgia Power: About Us"], Georgia Power website, accessed July 2009.</ref>

Georgia Power utilizes transmission lines carrying 115,00 volts, 230,000 volts and 500,000 volts. Georgia Power has interconnections with the [[Tennessee Valley Authority]] to the north, [[Alabama Power Company]] to the west, [[South Carolina Gas and Electric]] and [[Duke Energy]] to the east, and [[Florida Power and Light]] to the south.<ref>[http://www.georgiapower.com/about/home.asp Georgia Power: About Us"], Georgia Power website, accessed July 2009.</ref>

==Coal Plant Conversion=={{#ev:youtube|OJeCK6IqHLg|400|right|Biomass Conversion at Mitchell Plant.|frame}}In March 2009 the Georgia Public Service Commission approved Georgia Power asked the state's public service commission for approval request to convert the coal-fired its [[Mitchell Steam Generating Plant Mitchell(Georgia)]] Unit 3 from coal-fired to run on wood fuelbiomass. If approvedLocated near Albany, Georgia, the retrofit facility will begin reportedly be able to produce 96 megawatts of power once the conversion is completed in 2011 and June 2012, making it one of the largest biomass plant will start operating power plants in mid-2012the United States. The 96-MW biomass plant Georgia Power says it will run draw on surplus wood fuel from suppliers within a 100-mile radius of the power plant, and plans to begin the conversion by spring 2011.<ref>[http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/news/news_detail.cfm/news_id=12363 "Georgia Power Wins Approval to Switch Coal Plant to Biomass Power"] U.S. Department of Energy Website, March 25, 2009</ref> Plant Mitchell is one of many [[Coal plant conversion projects]] throughout the U.S. ==Proposed coal unit retirements=====Branch Plant===In March 2011, Georgia Power announced that it expects to request approval from the Georgia Public Service Commission to decertify two coal-generating units 1 and 2 at the [[Harllee Branch Generating Plant]], totaling 569 megawatts. The company expects to ask for decertification of the units as of the effective dates of the Georgia Multipollutant Rule, which are currently anticipated to be Dec. 31, 2013 for unit 1 and Oct. 1, 2013 for unit 2. GP said the costs of upgrades would be uneconomical for its customers. The commission is located near Albanyexpected to vote on the decertification request in spring 2012.<ref>[http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/georgia-power-announces-plans-to-decertify-two-coal-generating-units-118074374.html "Georgia Power Announces Plans to Decertify Two Coal Generating Units"] PR Newswire, March 16, 2011.</ref> ===Branch, Yates, and Kraft===On January 7, 2013, Georgia Power said it plans to seek approval from Georgia regulators to retire 15 coal-, oil- and natural gas-fired power plants in the state, totaling 2,061 megawatts (MW). The coal plants would be units 3 and 4 at [[Harllee Branch Generating Plant|Plant Branch]] in Putnam County; units 1-5 at [[Yates Steam Generating Plant|Plant Yates]] in Coweta County; and units 1-3 at [[Kraft Plant]] in Port Wentworth.  Also being retired are Kraft Unit 4 and Boulevard Plant 2 and 3, fired by natural gas and oil, and McManus Plant units 1-2, which are oil-fired. The company said it expects to ask to retire the units, other than Kraft 1-4, by the April 16, 2015, effective date of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) [[Mercury and Air Toxics]] (MATS) rule. The company said it expects to seek a one-year extension of the MATS compliance date for Plant Kraft and retire those units by April 16, 2016.<ref>[http://www.ajc.com/news/business/georgia-power-to-close-coal-oil-units/nTpSx/ "Georgia Power to close 15 coal, oil units,"] AJC, Jan. 7, 2013.</ref> ==GP and coal regulations==In July 2011, Georgia Power said it can’t meet the Jan. 1, 2012 deadline of the [[Cross State Air Pollution Rule]] by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to cap and regulate two major pollutants - [[sulfur dioxide]] and [[nitrogen oxide]] - from its coal-fired power plants. The EPA disagreed, saying in a statement: “[Utilities] have known that these emission reduction requirements were coming for many years now, and many have already taken many or all of the steps needed to comply.” Utilities that cannot meet the requirements will be forced to buy emission allowances, which vary in price depending upon the state. (For Georgia Power, the cost of emissions would start at $600 for every ton of sulfur dioxides and $500 for every ton of nitrogen oxides, with built-in increases for 2014.). Georgia Power would recover the cost of the emission allowances through fuel charges. The company could not ask for those costs until the emissions are actually used. The new EPA edict requires reductions in region-wide sulfur dioxide emissions of 20 percent by 2012 and 50 percent by 2014, and to curb region-wide nitrogen oxide emissions by 12 percent in 2012 and 18 percent in 2014. Georgia is grouped with states that won’t have to observe the 2014 requirements, the EPA said.  Georgia has struggled with its air quality for decades. In 1986-88 measurements by the Georgia Environmental Protection Division, the region’s [[ozone]] level reached its worst on record — measured at 124 parts per billion. When the EPA set 84 parts per billion as the ozone standard in 1997, the region registered 118 parts per billion in 1997-99 measurements; only in 2011 did it meet the 1997 standard. GeorgiaPower has pollution [[scrubbers]] installed on four of its coal units at [[Plant Bowen]] and [[William P. Hammond Steam-Electric Generating Plant]], as well as two units at [[Wansley Plant]] and one of the four units at the [[Scherer Steam Generating Station]]. Bowen and Wansley also have selective catalytic reduction (SCRs), as does one of the four units at Hammond. Scrubbers and SCRs are being built for the remaining units at Scherer. The installed scrubbers and SCRs must be done by 2015. The utility also has said it plans to close two of the four coal-fired units at Plant Branch.{{fact}}Plant McDonough’s two coal units are being converted to three natural gas units, the first of which will start producing power in 2012. The new EPA rule is the first of two that will impact coal plants. Guidelines to regulate mercury are expected in November 2011.<ref>Kristi E. Swartz, [http://www.ajc.com/business/ga-power-says-it-1039156.html "Ga. Power says it can't meet EPA deadline"] Atlanta Journal-Constitution, July 23, 2011.</ref>

Georgia Power generates energy from two nuclear plants in Georgia -- [[Plant Hatch]] and [[Plant Vogtle]] <ref>"[http://www.georgiapower.com/about/plants.asp Plants]," Georgia Power website, accessed September 2009.</ref> -- comprising 19 percent of the company's generating sources in 2008. <ref>"[http://www.georgiapower.com/about/facts.asp Facts & figures]," Georgia Power website, accessed September 2009.</ref>

In a bid to add two reactors to the Vogtle plant, Georgia Power lobbied the state legislature for the ability "to charge electric customers for construction costs before the nuclear plants start producing electricity," referred to as [[construction work in progress]] (CWIP). The legislature passed CWIP, as Senate Bill 31, but environmentalists filed a legal challenge to the measure in September 2009. The [[Southern Alliance for Clean Energy]] argued that in giving "Georgia Power permission to charge electric customers for construction costs before the nuclear plants start producing electricity, that the law amounted to a sort of tax that gives the utility something for nothing." The Alliance lawsuit states: "The adoption of the nuclear tariff by the Georgia General Assembly creates an unconstitutional gratuity in favor of Georgia Power and its stockholders, for, among other reasons, paying such stockholders of Georgia Power a return on equity in excess of $1 billion before Units 3 and 4 at Plant Vogtle are even put into service, i.e., for services which have not been rendered." <ref>Walter C. Jones, "[http://www.onlineathens.com/stories/090609/new_490132901.shtml Nuclear opponents attacking from many angles: Lawsuit may halt reactor construction]," Morris News Service / ''Athens Banner-Herald'' (Georgia), September 5, 2009.</ref> However state utility regulators agreed to Georgia Power’s plans for the two 1,100-megawatt reactors.<ref name="Federal">Kristi E. Swartz, [http://www.ajc.com/business/federal-permit-clears-way-124628.html "Federal permit clears way for nuclear plants at Vogtle"] Atlanta Business News, August 26, 2009</ref> In August 2009 federal regulators completed their review of safety and environmental issues related to building two additional reactors at the site and granted Georgia Power a federal permit, called an early-site permit, to begin preliminary construction work. The permit is good for 20 years, but the utility still needs to secure a combined operating license from federal regulators. Construction of the reactors is expected to be completed by 2017. The utility’s portion of the total estimated $14 billion cost will be $6.4 billion.<ref name="Federal"/>

Website: http://www.georgiapower.com<br>