Difference between revisions of "Bush administration warrantless wiretapping"

From SourceWatch
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(SW: →‎2007: - add external link)
 
(33 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
:"The government's public position then was the mirror opposite of its rationale today in defending its warrantless [[domestic spying]] program, which has come under attack as a violation of [[civil liberties]]."
 
:"The government's public position then was the mirror opposite of its rationale today in defending its warrantless [[domestic spying]] program, which has come under attack as a violation of [[civil liberties]]."
 +
  
 
----
 
----
==Related SourceWatch Resources==
+
 
 +
==Resources & articles==
 +
===Related SourceWatch articles===
 
*[[Bush administration flip flops]]
 
*[[Bush administration flip flops]]
 
*[[Bush administration U.S. attorney firings controversy]]
 
*[[Bush administration U.S. attorney firings controversy]]
Line 30: Line 33:
 
*[[Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court]]
 
*[[Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court]]
  
==External Links==
 
 
===Documents===
 
===Documents===
 
*[http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2002_hr/index.html#fisa "Proposals to Amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. 31 July 2002 -- Senate Intelligence Committee."] (posted on Federation of American Scientists' website).
 
*[http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2002_hr/index.html#fisa "Proposals to Amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. 31 July 2002 -- Senate Intelligence Committee."] (posted on Federation of American Scientists' website).
 
*[http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2002_hr/073102baker.html Statement] of [[James A. Baker]], Counsel for Intelligence Policy, Before the Select Committee on Intelligence, U.S. Senate, Concerning Proposals to Amend the [[Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978]], presented July 31, 2002. (posted on Federation of American Scientists' website).
 
*[http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2002_hr/073102baker.html Statement] of [[James A. Baker]], Counsel for Intelligence Policy, Before the Select Committee on Intelligence, U.S. Senate, Concerning Proposals to Amend the [[Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978]], presented July 31, 2002. (posted on Federation of American Scientists' website).
  
===Articles & Commentary===
+
===External articles===
 
====2006====
 
====2006====
 
*David E. Sanger and John O'Neil, [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/23/politics/23cnd-wiretap.html?hp&ex=1138078800&en=f1a26c18881a59c4&ei=5094&partner=homepage "White House Begins New Effort to Defend Surveillance Program,"] ''New York Times'', January 23, 2006: "Gen. [[Michael V. Hayden]], who led the National Security Agency when it began the warrantless wiretaps, vigorously defended the program, though he acknowledged that it depended on a lower standard of evidence than required by courts."  
 
*David E. Sanger and John O'Neil, [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/23/politics/23cnd-wiretap.html?hp&ex=1138078800&en=f1a26c18881a59c4&ei=5094&partner=homepage "White House Begins New Effort to Defend Surveillance Program,"] ''New York Times'', January 23, 2006: "Gen. [[Michael V. Hayden]], who led the National Security Agency when it began the warrantless wiretaps, vigorously defended the program, though he acknowledged that it depended on a lower standard of evidence than required by courts."  
Line 59: Line 61:
 
*[http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/20060126_bush_voted_spying/ "Bush Voted Against Spying Before Voting for It,"] ''truthdig!'', January 26, 2006.
 
*[http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/20060126_bush_voted_spying/ "Bush Voted Against Spying Before Voting for It,"] ''truthdig!'', January 26, 2006.
 
*Eric Lichtblau, [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/29/politics/29nsa.html?hp&ex=1143694800&en=74577a3fe79431bf&ei=5094&partner=homepage "Judges on Secretive Panel Speak Out on Spy Program,"] ''Washington Post'', March 29, 2006.
 
*Eric Lichtblau, [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/29/politics/29nsa.html?hp&ex=1143694800&en=74577a3fe79431bf&ei=5094&partner=homepage "Judges on Secretive Panel Speak Out on Spy Program,"] ''Washington Post'', March 29, 2006.
 +
*David C. Manchester, [http://thewall.civiblog.org/rsf/nsa.html "Warrantless Surveillance and NSA Wiretap Document Collection at CiviBlog,"] HTML versions of PDFs, Congressional Briefings and Testimony, CRS Reports, links to Court Decisions, February - August, 2006.
  
 
====2007====
 
====2007====
Line 98: Line 101:
 
=====June=====
 
=====June=====
 
*Michael Isikoff, [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18990233/site/newsweek/?from=rss "Calling John Ashcroft. The House and Senate Intelligence Committees have asked the former attorney general to testify about his role in a dramatic showdown over a controversial eavesdropping program. Will he play ball?"] ''Newsweek'' (MSNBC), June 1, 2007.
 
*Michael Isikoff, [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18990233/site/newsweek/?from=rss "Calling John Ashcroft. The House and Senate Intelligence Committees have asked the former attorney general to testify about his role in a dramatic showdown over a controversial eavesdropping program. Will he play ball?"] ''Newsweek'' (MSNBC), June 1, 2007.
 +
*[http://thinkprogress.org/2007/06/05/gonzales-spying "Gonzales Contradicts His Sworn Testimony About Bush’s Warrantless Spying Program,"] ''Think Progress'', June 5, 2007.
 +
*Laurie Kellman, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/06/AR2007060602286.html "Cheney Blocked Official's Promotion,"] Associated Press (''Washington Post''), June 6, 2007.
 +
*Dan Eggen, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/06/AR2007060602297.html "Official: Cheney Urged Wiretaps. Stand-In for Ashcroft Alleges Interference,"] ''Washington Post'', June 7, 2007.
 +
 +
====2008====
 +
*[http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/by/murray_waas Murray Waas,] [http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200809u/gonzales-notes/2 "The Case of the Gonzales Notes,"] the Atlantic, Swpt. 26, 2008.
 +
*[http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/by/murray_waas Murray Waas], [http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200809u/gonzales-investigation "What Did Bush Tell Gonzales?"] [http://www.theatlantic.com/ The ''Atlantic'',] Sept. 26, 2008.
 +
 +
====2009====
 +
*[[Murray Waas]], [http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2009/11/alberto_gonzales_quietly_trium.html "Dropped Call: Alberto Gonzales Won't Be Charged Over Testimony,"] [http://nymag.com/author/murray%20waas  ''New York Magazine''], Nov. 23, 2009.
  
 
[[category:scandals]][[category:George W. Bush]][[category:national security]]
 
[[category:scandals]][[category:George W. Bush]][[category:national security]]
 +
[[Category:Civil liberties (U.S.)]]

Latest revision as of 19:26, 13 March 2010

This article is part of our coverage of the
Bush administration's domestic spying programs.
Main article:
Sub-articles:

The Bush administration's false FISA defense was exposed on January 24, 2006, by blogger Glenn Greenwald who had been pursuing the story about President George W. Bush's domestic spying:

"In June, 2002," Greenwald wrote, "Republican Sen. Michael DeWine of Ohio introduced legislation (S. 2659) which would have eliminated ... the 'probable cause' barrier (at least for non-U.S. persons) which the Administration is now pointing to as the reason why it had to circumvent FISA."

Knight Ridder Newspapers' Jonathan S. Landay picked up the story the next day, January 25, 2006:

"President Bush, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and other top officials now argue that warrantless eavesdropping is necessary in part because complying with the FISA law is too burdensome and impedes the government's ability to rapidly track communications between suspected terrorists.
"In its 2002 statement, the Justice Department said it opposed a legislative proposal to change FISA to make it easier to obtain warrants that would allow the super-secret National Security Agency to listen in on communications involving non-U.S. citizens inside the United States.
"Today, senior U.S. officials complain that FISA prevents them from doing that."

Dan Eggen wrote in the January 26, 2006, Washington Post:

"The Bush administration rejected a 2002 Senate proposal that would have made it easier for FBI agents to obtain surveillance warrants in terrorism cases, concluding that the system was working well and that it would likely be unconstitutional to lower the legal standard."

And the Los Angeles Times' David G. Savage wrote on January 26, 2006:

"Four years ago, top Bush administration lawyers told Congress they opposed lowering the legal standard for intercepting the phone calls of foreigners who were in the United States, even while the administration had secretly adopted a lower standard on its own.
"The government's public position then was the mirror opposite of its rationale today in defending its warrantless domestic spying program, which has come under attack as a violation of civil liberties."



Resources & articles

Related SourceWatch articles

Documents

External articles

2006

2007

May
June

2008

2009