Indian Point (Nuclear Power Station)

Indian Point is a nuclear power station operating in New York state. The station, which is owned by Entergy, operates two Westinghouse pressurized light water reactors. In November 2006, Entergy announced that it was seeking the relicensing of the plant for 20 years. [1]

Siren problems

In August 2007, the New York Times reported on Entergy's problems with getting its "new $15 million emergency siren system up and running" at the Indian Point nuclear power station in New York. "The sirens are meant to alert residents within 10 miles of the plant of an emergency," explained the Times. But, during testing, "sirens that were supposed to be heard miles away were inaudible in several areas. Alarms that were meant to be tested silently blared unexpectedly, startling residents who had not been warned." [2]

"The system was supposed to be working by the end of January [2007]. Entergy received a 75-day extension from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). But on April 12, three days before the second target date, 31 sirens failed to sound during a test. After Entergy missed the April deadline, the N.R.C. fined the company $130,000." The third deadline was August 24, which Entergy spokesman Jim Steets said the company was "confident we’ll make it." [3]

The siren problems "come in the midst of Entergy’s application to renew the nuclear power plants' licenses for another 20 years," noted the Times. "Indian Point 2's license expires in 2013, Indian Point 3's in 2015." Yet, "the siren problem has no bearing on the relicensing." [4]

On August 31, 2007, the New York Times reported that Entergy "had missed its third deadline for installing the [emergency siren] system and could face fines." [5]

In January 2008, the NRC proposed a $650,000 fine against Indian Point, for not meeting the "deadline to install new emergency warning sirens with backup power supplies." The fine is "10 times the normal size" of such sanctions, reported the New York Times, with possible additional fines if the safety requirements are not met "in a timely manner."

Relicensing debate

On November 30, 2007, the state of New York filed a 313-page petition with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), asking the agency "to deny an application to extend the license of the Indian Point nuclear reactors, citing 'a long and troubling history of problems.'" Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo remarked, "I believe Indian Point should be closed and it should be closed now." The New York Times reported that NRC officials "could not recall a previous occasion when a state had tried to intervene in a license-extension proceeding to block the extension." The license for the nuclear power complex's reactor 2 reactor expires in 2013, and for reactor 3 in 2015.

Nuclear industry consultant Patrick Moore claimed "there was 'a logical inconsistency' in the argument being presented by opponents of the plant. Mr. Moore said the goal of shutting Indian Point and of reducing carbon emissions were 'mutually exclusive' in a time of concern over global warming. He added that if the reactors were shut, the logical substitute would be two new ones."

In March 2008, the NRC held a hearing about the Indian Point applications to extend the plants' licenses by 20 years. The hearing was "the first time that a state had stepped forward to flatly oppose license renewals," reported Matthew Wald. "[F]or the opponents -- the state, Westchester County and several environmental groups -- to win the day, they would have to persuade the panel and the regulatory agency itself to reconsider what arguments are admissible. ... The commission has ruled that for an argument to be considered in license extension hearings, it must deal with problems that may arise because the license is extended. The state contends, however, that the region’s extraordinary population density, when considered together with the threat of terrorism or earthquake, makes the plants unsafe." However, the NRC contends that the plant's location or past security record can not be considered in relicensing hearings.

Safety panel

In March 2008, Entergy announced the formation of an "Independent Safety Evaluation" panel, to "provide public assurances about the operation and protection of New York's largest nuclear power facility." Entergy selected panel co-chairs Drs. James Rhoades and Neil Todreas. The co-chairs then recruited the other ten panel members. The environmental group Riverkeeper and local elected officials questioned the independence of the panel, since Entergy is paying panel members.

The Indian Point panel's media contact is Matthew Simmons of Potomac Communications Group. On behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute, the Potomac PR firm previously ghost-wrote pro-nuclear op/eds that appeared in newspapers across the country. The Austin Chronicle, which reported the campaign, called it "Big Nuke's vast op-ed conspiracy: a decades-long, centrally orchestrated plan to defraud the nation's newspaper readers by misrepresenting the propaganda of one hired atomic gun as the learned musings of disparate academics and other nuclear-industry 'experts.'"

SourceWatch resources

• Burson-Marsteller
• Nuclear PR
• New York Affordable Reliable Electricity Alliance
• Patrick Moore on Nuclear Power
• Pilgrim (Nuclear Power Station)
• Potomac Communications Group
• Vermont Yankee (Nuclear Power Station)

External links

Websites on Indian Point

• Entergy's site supporting re-licensing
• Riverkeeper, an environmental group critical of Indian Point
• Indian Point Safe Energy Coalition

Articles

• "Entergy Seeks 20-year License Renewal For Indian Point Energy Center: Rudolph Giuliani and Greenpeace Co-Founder Patrick Moore Lend Support to Relicensing Bid", Media Release, November 22, 2006 .
• Jim Fitzgerald, "Some Indian Point workers afraid to raise safety issues, NRC says", Associated Press, December 21, 2006.
• Noreen O'Donnell, "Leaks make Indian Point hard to defend", The Journal News, May 14, 2007.
• Greg Bruno, "Indian Point's bid for license renewal generates much heat in court of public opinion: Entergy wants to operate Indian Point’s nuclear reactors for another 20 years", Times Herald-Record, June 6, 2007.
• "Buchanan: Indian Point Misses Siren Deadline," Associated Press, August 31, 2007.
• "Critics, supporters, about even at latest Indian Point hearing", MidHudson News, September 20, 2007.
• Greg Clary, "Water, air, overall safety dominate Indian Point meeting", The Journal News (New York), September 20, 2007.
• Greg Clary, "Activists push for closing Indian Point with help from actor Alec Baldwin," The Journal News (New York), November 13, 2007.
• Greg Clary, "Value of stars' views on Indian Point questioned," The Journal News (New York), November 16, 2007.
• Editorial, "Indian Point star power," The Journal News (New York), November 17, 2007.
• Cindy Skrzycki, "Nuclear Safety Rule Ignites Strong Reactions," Washington Post, January 15, 2008.
• Ilya Marritz, "Indian Point Owner Seeks Safety Assessment," WNYC Radio, April 28, 2008.