Difference between revisions of "Regulatory lapdogs"
Debbie Saye (talk | contribs) m (fixed Griles link) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Regulatory lapdogs''' are supposed to be "watchdogs" but have fallen over to becoming tools of the industries which they are supposed to oversee. Cases can probably be well made from the [[Bush regime]] of | '''Regulatory lapdogs''' are supposed to be "watchdogs" but have fallen over to becoming tools of the industries which they are supposed to oversee. Cases can probably be well made from the [[Bush regime]] of | ||
| + | *EPA | ||
| + | **[[Bush regime environmental record]] | ||
*FDA | *FDA | ||
*FCC [http://www.publicintegrity.org/telecom/] | *FCC [http://www.publicintegrity.org/telecom/] | ||
Revision as of 20:43, 5 April 2004
Regulatory lapdogs are supposed to be "watchdogs" but have fallen over to becoming tools of the industries which they are supposed to oversee. Cases can probably be well made from the Bush regime of
- EPA
- FDA
- FCC [1]
- House Ethics Committee [2]
- allegations of threats & bribery on the House floor during the Medicare Prescription Drug Bill Vote Scandal, 2003
- Westar Energy Bribery Scandal
- did U.S. Rep. Billy Tauzin (R-La.), who had a key role in writing the Medicare prescription drug law, break House ethics rules when negotiating a lucrative job with the drug industry's top lobbying group.? [3]
- Texans for a Republican Majority [4]
- 17 March UPI [5] notes:
- illegal use of campaign funds,
- misuse of a federal agency for political purposes,
- conflicts of interest,
- and strong-arm tactics against lobbyists and campaign contributors.
- J. Steven Griles, Deputy Secretary of the Interior
"With key positions in the hands of industry veterans, the administration has been able to pursue one of its most effective stealth tactics -- steering clear of legislative battles and working instead within the difficult-to-understand, yawn-producing realm of agency regulations. It's a strategy that has served Bush well, especially in his push to give the energy industry -- which donated $ 2.8 mm to the 2000 Bush campaign -- access to some of the nation's last wild lands." [6]
"By using stealth tactics to pursue a corporate agenda, the Bush administration is undermining the very landscape of democracy. The White House has also been darkly brilliant at using the courts to do its dirty work -- through methods suchas "sweetheart suits," the practice of encouraging states and private groups to file lawsuits against the federal government, and then agreeing to negotiated settlements that bypass environmental laws without any interference from Congress or the public. [7]
